Abstract
The chapter takes a two-pronged approach. Firstly it reviews the fundamentals of the Mekong Basin system, providing a broad overview of the natural system and its basic water regime and from there defines the key developmental and governance challenges. Secondly, it performs a historical odyssey in order to assess which previous attempts have been made to regulate the system, and what we have learnt from them. At its core we find three contemporary tools developed to accommodate a sharpening regional politics with urgent development imperatives, all emanating from the MRC. These are the Water Utilization Project (WUP), the IWRM Strategic Framework, and the Basin Development Plan (BDP). They are scrutinized before we conclude that the MRC-agreement, as well as these three tools, have delivered valuable input to basin governance. Simultaneously we are pointing out that they have not provided the final solution for how to deal with the accelerating urge for exploitation of the system’s natural resources.
Keywords
- Basin Development
- Triple Bottom Line
- Water Governance
- Hydropower Project
- Khmer Rouge
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Sections of this chapter occurred in Phillips 2006, but have been revised, added, and updated.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The Mekong River is also known as the Dza-chu in Tibet, Lancang Jiang in China, Mae Nam Khong in Thailand, Mae Khong in Laos, Mekongk in Cambodia, and Cuu Long in Vietnam.
- 2.
The People’s Republic of China, termed ‘China’ here for convenience.
- 3.
The central highlands of Vietnam and parts of the north of the country are also located within the Mekong River basin.
- 4.
What possibly was the largest fish ever caught in fresh water was brought up in the Mekong system, in Thailand. It was a giant catfish measuring 300 kg, ‘being the size of a Grizzly bear’. These giant catfish are rare these days and the discussion on the diminishing stock is directly connected to dambuilding and blasting of rock formations (Mydans, The New York Times, August 26, 2005).
- 5.
Several of these controversial issues will be discussed at length below.
- 6.
The formal name of the agreement is: ‘Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River Basin.’
- 7.
The descriptive aspect of the review of the three core programmes below is collected from the MRC material.
References
Cowan E, Shaw BJ (2003) Mekong River development – whose dreams? Which visions? Water Int 28(2):268–275
Dore J, Lazarus K (2009) De-marginalizing the Mekong River commission. In: Molle F, Foran T, Käkönen M (eds) Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: hydropower, livelihoods and governance. Earthscan, London, pp 357–382
Earle A, Jägerskog A, Öjendal J (eds) (2010) Transboundary water management principles and practice. Earthscan, London
Fox C, Sneddon C (2005) Flood pulses, international watercourse law, and common pool resources: a case study of the Mekong lowlands. WIDER research paper 2005/22
Hirsch P (2011) A new geopolitics of mekong dams? Bangkok Post, 1 May 2011. http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/investigation/234766/a-new-geopolitics-of-mekong-dams. Accessed 21 May 2011
Hirsch P, Jensen KM (2006) National interests and transboundary water governance in the Mekong. AMRC, University of Sydney, Sydney
Independent Evaluation (2007) Independent evaluation of the water utilization start-up project, final report. 28 Dec 2007. Mimeo, Vientiane
International Rivers. http://www.internationalrivers.org/southeast-asia/mekong-mainstream-dams. Accessed 17 June 2011
Jacobs J (1992) International river basin development and climatic change: the lower Mekong of Southeast Asia. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of California
Launey GD (2011) The stalled battle for the future of the Mekong River. BBC news, 20 Apr 2011. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13139470. Accessed 21 May 2011
Makim A (2002) The changing face of Mekong resource politics in the post-Cold War era: re-negotiating arrangements for water resource management in the lower Mekong River basin (1991–1995). AMRC, working paper no. 6
McCully P (1996) Silenced rivers – the ecology and politics of large dams. Zed Books, London
Mekong Agreement (1995) Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River basin. The Kingdom of Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, the Kingdom of Thailand and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Apr 1995
Molle F (2008) Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: insight from the water sector. Water Altern 1(1):23–40
Molle F, Floch P, Promphakping B, Blake DJH (2009) The ‘Greening of Isaan’: politics, ideology and irrigation development in the Northeast of Thailand. In: Molle F, Foran T, Käkönen M (eds) Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: hydropower, livelihoods and governance. Earthscan, London/Sterling, pp 253–282
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2003) State of the basin report. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2004) MRC integrated basin flow management, 2004–2008. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2009) Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Mekong mainstream dams. Study commissioned by the MRC, May 2009. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2010) Assessment of basin-wide development scenarios; MRC basin Development Plan Programme phase 2, Nov 2010
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2011) IWRM-based basin development strategy for the lower Mekong basin. Mekong River Commission
MRC (Mekong River Commission) homepage (2005) www.mrcmekong.org/programmes/wup/wup.htm. Accessed 1–13 Oct 2005
MRC Media Release (2011) Lower Mekong countries take prior consultation on Xayaburi project to ministerial level. MRC media release 19 Apr 2011. http://www.mrcmekong.org/MRC_news/press11/Lower-mekong-coutries-take-prior-consultation19Apr11.html. Accessed 21 May 2011
Öjendal J (2000) Sharing the good – modes of managing water resources in the lower Mekong River basin. PhD dissertation, Department of Peace and Development Studies, Göteborg University
Phillips DJ, Daoudy M, Öjendal J, Turton A, McCaffrey S (2006) Trans-boundary water cooperation as a tool for conflict prevention and for broader benefit-sharing. Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm
Radio Voice of Vietnam (2011) Vietnam fosters cooperation with Laos and Thailand. http://english.vovnews.vn/Home/Vietnam-fosters-cooperation-with-Laos-and-Thailand/20115/126419.vov. Accessed 21 May 2011
Radosevich GE (1996) The Mekong – a new framework for development and management. In: Biswas AK, Hashimoto T (eds) Asian international waters – from Ganges-Brahmaputra to Mekong. Oxford University Press, Bombay
WCD (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. World commission on dams. Earthscan, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Öjendal, J., Jensen, K.M. (2011). Politics and Development of the Mekong River Basin: Transboundary Dilemmas and Participatory Ambitions. In: Öjendal, J., Hansson, S., Hellberg, S. (eds) Politics and Development in a Transboundary Watershed. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0476-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0476-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0475-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0476-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)