Advertisement

Husserl and Bolzano

  • Jocelyn Benoist
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 80)

Abstract

Bolzano’s influence on Husserl has recently come to be appreciated at its true worth. It is actually an extremely important one.

Keywords

Logical Investigation Deductive System Semantic Realism Analytic Proposition Absolute Realism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Benoist, Jocelyn. Phénoménologie, sémantique, ontologie. Paris: P.U.F., 1997. Ch. 2.Google Scholar
  2. Benoist, Jocelyn. “L’identité d’un sens: Husserl, des espèces à la grammaire,” Liminaires phénoménologiques: recherches sur le développement de la théorie de la signification de Husserl, Jocelyn Benoist, Robert Brisart, Jacques English (eds.), Brussels: Presses des Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, 1998, pp. 219–71.Google Scholar
  3. Benoist, Jocelyn. L’a priori conceptuel: Bolzano, Husserl, Schlick. Paris: Vrin, 1999. Ch. 6–8.Google Scholar
  4. Beyer, Christian. Von Bolzano zu Husserl. Eine Untersuchung über den Ursprung der phänomenologischen Bedeutungslehre (Phænomenologica 139 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Bolzano, Bernard. The Paradoxes of the Infinite. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1950 (1831).Google Scholar
  6. Bolzano, Bernard. Wissenschaftslehre. Sulzbach: Seidel, 1837 (reprinted Aalen, Scientia, 1981 ).Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, Edmund. “Entwurf einer `Vorrede’ zu den Logischen Untersuchungen,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie I,1939, pp. 106133, 319–339 (cited in the text as Husserl 1913).Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, Edmund. Ideas, General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. New York: Colliers, 1962.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, Edmund. Philosophie der Arithmetik, mit ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901) (Hua XII). The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970 (1891).Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. Vorlesungen über Bedeutungslehre, Sommersemester 1908 (Hua XXVI). Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. Kerry, Benno. “Ueber Anschauung und ihre psychische Verarbeitung”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie,1885–1891.Google Scholar
  13. Laz, Jacques. Bolzano critique de Kant. Paris: Vrin, 1993. Proust, Joëlle. Questions de forme: Logique et proposition analytique de Kant d Carnap. Paris: Fayard, 1986. Sect. II.Google Scholar
  14. Rollinger, Robin D. Husserl’s Position in the School of Brentano (Phænomenologica 150 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simons, Peter. Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Twardowski, Kasimir. On the Content and Object of Presentations. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jocelyn Benoist
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de Paris IFrance

Personalised recommendations