Advertisement

The Question of Grammar in Logical Investigations, with Special Reference to Brentano, Marty, Bolzano and Later Developments in Logic

  • Jocelyn Benoist
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 80)

Abstract

The question of grammar is among the most important in Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Grammar measures the ability of thought to produce sense, thus opening the question of the possibility of objects—even where they cannot exist in any real sense. Grammar is the basic structure of the meaning modality of intentionality which, in Logical Investigations, is the fundamental modality.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1970). Aspects of Language. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benoist, Jocelyn (1997a). Phénoménologie, sémantique, ontologie: Husserl et la tradition logique autrichienne. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
  3. Benoist, Jocelyn (1997b). “Le sens, le non-sens et les limites de la philosophie”, Critique 606 (November), pp. 811–36.Google Scholar
  4. Benoist, Jocelyn (1999a), L’a priori conceptuel: Bolzano, Husserl, Schlick, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  5. Benoist, Jocelyn (1999b). “Bolzano, Husserl et l’idée de grammaire”, Les Etudes philosophiques, no. 4, p. 521–34.Google Scholar
  6. Dastur, Françoise (1994). “Husserl et le projet d’une grammaire pure logique”, Cahiers de philosophie ancienne et du langage de l’ Université de Paris-XII—Val de Marne, pp. 87–103.Google Scholar
  7. Gardies, Jean-Louis (1975) Esquisse d’une grammaire pure. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  8. Holenstein, Elmar (1974), Jakobson ou le structuralisme phénoménologique. Paris: Seghers. (English trans. by Catherine and Tarcisius Schelbert, Roman Jakobson’s Approach to Language: Phenomenological Structuralism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  9. Holenstein, Elmar (1975). “Jakobson and Husserl. A Contribution to the Genealogy of Structuralism”, Human Context 7, pp. 61–83.Google Scholar
  10. Kuroda, S. -Y. (1973). “Edmund Husserl’s Grammaire générale et raisonnée and Anton Marty” Foundations of Language 10: 2 (July), pp. 169–95.Google Scholar
  11. Mulligan, Kevin ed. (1990), Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Parret, Herman (1976). “Le débat de la psychologie et de la logique concernant le langage: Marty et Husserl”, History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics, Herman Parret (ed.), Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 732–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jocelyn Benoist
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de Paris IFrance

Personalised recommendations