Advertisement

Philosophy of Language and Corporeity

  • Luigia Di Pinto
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 80)

Abstract

The fundamental request of contemporary philosophy of language is “the appeal to clarity and critical rigor both in problem solving and formulation”.1 Philosophy of language appeals to our taste for criticality, with the extremely important intention of setting us free of the naïve belief in our language’s neutrality.2 According to Husserl, this naïve belief cages itself in false consciousness. The appeal of his philosophy of language is, therefore, addressed towards the a-critical way of formulating and analyzing problems, the way logic (the instrument of thinking inside language (logos)) is used to apply those organizing, classifying and rationalistic procedures upon which Greek Philosophy was built, just as so-called exact science also is. From Galileo onwards, and to be more precise from Galileoism onwards, this science has further rationalized and formalized thought. Galileo inaugurated the mathematization of Aristotle’s physics.3 Galileoism, however, consists of a naïve utilization of the mathematical procedures of physics so ingeniously inaugurated by Galileo. Their naïve use—Husserl explains—coincides with a kind of psychologism which insists on ignoring the linguistic dimension of otherness. Otherness means care for dialogicality. Furthermore, dialogical otherness implies, according to Husserl, starting at zero, “before everything”. It is corporeity (Leiblichkeit), the central element of the transformation of objects and of material phenomena into linguistic signs.

Keywords

Contemporary Philosophy Linguistic Sign Universal Truth Linguistic Experience Existential Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Austin, J. L. Come fare cose con le parole, C. Penco and M. Sbisà (trans. and eds. ). Genoa: Marietti, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, Noam. Le structure della sintassi, F. Antinucci (trans. and ed. ). Rome: Laterza, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. de Saussure, Ferdinand. Cours de linguistique générale (1916), Tullio De Mauro (trans. and ed. ). Rome: Laterza, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Dummett, Michael. La verità e altri enigmi, M. Santambrogio (trans. and ed. ). Milan: Il Saggiatore, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Vol I, ( Italian translation Bologna: Il Mulino, 1997 ).Google Scholar
  6. Habermas, Jürgen. Critical Debates. Cambridge MA: D. Held, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, Jürgen. Etica del discorso. Rome: Laterza, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, Edmund. Gesammelte Schriften (Husserliana). The Hague: Nijhoff, 1950, Hua I, Cartesianische Meditationen (1929 ff.), 1973. Hua VI, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften,1976. Hua X, Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstsein (1893–1917), 1966. Hua XI, Analysen zur passiven Synthesis (1918–26), 1966. Hua XII, “Zur Logik der Zeichen (Semiotik)”, Aufsätze und Rezensionen,pp. 340–73 (“On the Logic of Signs (Semiotic) in Husserl’s” Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics [translated by Dallas Willard], [Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994] pp. 20–51). Hua XVII, Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929), 1974. Hua XXIV, Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen (1906/07), 1984. Hua XXVI, Vorlesungen über Bedeutungslehre (1908), 1987. Hua XVIII, Logische Untersuchungen I (1900), 1975. Hua XIX, Logische Untersuchungen II (1901), 1968. Hua XX, Logische Untersuchungen III (1901), 1968. Hua XXIII, Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung (1898–1925), 1980.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, Edmund. Erfahrung und Urteil. Hamburg: Classen, 1954 (1948).Google Scholar
  10. Lacan, Jacques. Funzione e campo della parola e del linguaggio in psicoanalisi (1956), in his Scritti, Turin: Einaudi, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. Levinas, Emmanuel. Outside the Subject, M. B. Smith (trans.). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. Peirce, Charles. Come rendere chiare le nostre idee, Dario Antiseri (trans. and ed. ). Bergamo: Minerva Italica, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Ricoeur, Paul. From Text to Action, K. Blarney and J. B. Thompson (trans.). Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. Searle, John. Atti linguistici, G. Cardona (trans. and ed. ). Turin: Boringhieri, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Stein, Edith. Einführung in die Philosophie (Werke XIII). Freiburg: Herder, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. Stein, Edith. Beiträge zur philosophische Begründung der Psychologie und der Geistwisseschaften (Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung v), Halle: 1922, ( Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  17. Weber, Max. Le sette protestanti e lo spirito del capitalismo, R. Guiducci (trans. and ed. ). Milan: Rizzoli, 1977.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Alston, William P. Philosophy of Language, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964.Google Scholar
  2. Buzzatti, Gabriella and Salvo, Anna. Il corpo-parola delle donne. Milan: Raffaello Cortina, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. Bonomi, Andrea. “Il problema del linguaggio in Husserl”, Aut Aut 118, July 1970.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida Jacques. E. Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: An Introduction, J. P. Leavey (trans., preface and epilogue ). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. Di Pinto, Luigia. Il problema dell’ immaginazione in Husserl, Bari: Levante, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Di Pinto, Luigia. “Archeology of Modalization in Husserl: from Analogies to Passive Synthesis” (Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XXIX), A.-T. Tymieniecka (ed.).Google Scholar
  7. Di Pinto, Luigia. Impronte kantiane in Husserl. Bari: Cacucci, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. Di Pinto, Luigia. “L’estetica di Jürgen Habermas come etica del comunicare”, in Jürgen Habermas, Hannah Arendt, Nicolai Hartmann. Trittico di estetica (several authors), Bari: Levante, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Di Pinto, Luigia. Il respiro della filosofia in Edith Stein. Rome: Laterza, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Fewtrell, David. Clinical Phenomenology and cognitive Psychology. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. Gargani, Aldo. Introduzione a Wittgenstein. Rome: Laterza, 1980. Gaston, Alberto. Genealogia dell’alienazione (2nd. ed.). Milan: Feltrinelli, 1998 (1987).Google Scholar
  12. Haaparanta, Leila. Mind, Meaning and Mathematics. Essays on the Philosophical Views of Husserl and Frege. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Haney, Kathleen M. Intersubjectivity Revisited. Phenomenology and the Other. Athens OH: Ohio University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. Itkonen, Matti. “Alter et Alter, the Two Faces of the Mirror”, Phenomenological Inquiry 23 (1999), pp. 107–32.Google Scholar
  15. Iturrate, Miguel. Psychoanalysis and Phenomenology. Toward a Human Synthesis. New York: Vantage Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Laird, Gordon. Therapeutic Philosophy, Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University Press, 1995. M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
  17. Lanigan, Richard L. Speaking and Semiology. Maurice MerleauPonty’s Phenomenological Theory of Existential Communication (2nd ed.). Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. Mangione, Corrado. “La logica nel ventesimo secolo”, in L. Geymonat, Storia del pensiero fi’losofico e scientifico VI, Milan: Garzanti, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. Marbach, Eduard. Mental Representations and Consciousness. Toward a Phenomenological Theory of Representation and Reference. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pieretti, Antonio. “Introduction”, La svolta linguistica in filosofia, G. Ryle. (ed.), A. Pieretti (trans.). Rome: Città Nuova, 1975.Google Scholar
  21. Pieretti, Antonio. “Espressione e comunicazione: un rapporto da ricostituire”, Annali della Pubblica Istruzione 34 (1988).Google Scholar
  22. Pieretti, Antonio. “Le condizioni trascendentali della comunicazione” (1989), in I fondamenti del comunicare, Padua: Gregoriana, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Ponzio, Augusto. Tra semiotica e letteratura. Milan: Bompiani, 1992.Google Scholar
  24. Reale, Giovanni. “Ruolo delle dottrine non scritte di Platone ‘Intorno al bene’ nella Repubblica e nel Filebo’ ”. Naples: Istituto Suor Orsola Benincasa, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. Sini, Carlo. “Presentation” to Husserl, E. Semiotica, C. Di Martino (trans. and ed. ). Milan: Spirali, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. Snyder, Lee R. The Development of Cognitive Synthesis in Kant and Husserl. Lewiston: Mellen, 1995.Google Scholar
  27. Taminiaux, Jacques. Poetics, Speculation and Judgment. The Shadow of the Work of Art from Kant to Phenomenology, M. Gendre (ed. and trans. ). Albany NY: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  28. Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. (ed.). Manifestations of Reason. Life, Historicity, Culture (Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XI ). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993.Google Scholar
  29. Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. (ed.). Heaven, Earth and in-between in the Harmony of Life (Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XLVII). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigia Di Pinto
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BariItaly

Personalised recommendations