Advertisement

Phenomenology in North America and “Continental” Philosophy

  • Robert Sweeney
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 80)

Abstract

In any description of phenomenology in North America, it is important to distinguish it from “Continental” philosophy since the lines between them are too often blurred or non-existent in many minds. Continental philosophy is really a catch-all designation for much of what goes on in European philosophy today as well as in its American spin-offs, and it includes quite a heterogeneous set of approaches, philosophical and marginally so: Hegelianism, Marxism, neo-Nietzscheanism, critical theory (both literary and socio-political as in the Frankfurt School, e.g., Habermas), psychoanalysis (e.g., Lacan, Irigaray), existentialism, structuralism, post-modernism, feminism, etc.— even pragmatism in the version developed by Richard Rorty. Phenomenology is also included in depictions of Continental philosophy and is indeed usually assigned a founding role in it; but even in that major role it is only one strand, and hence should not be equated with it. It should also be noted that “Continental philosophy” is often used simply to make a distinction from “Anglo-Saxon” philosophy, which is typically equated with “analytic” philosophy. One way to clarify matters is to refer to the “core-concepts” delineated elsewhere in this volume, whereby one can determine what is strictly phenomenological from other approaches.

Keywords

Major Work Phenomenological Research Book Series Continental Philosophy Hermeneutic Phenomenology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Herbert Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement ( The Hague: Nijhoff, 1982 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albert Chandler, “Professor Husserl’s Program of Philosophic Reform” Philosophical Review XXVI (1917), 634–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul Schilpp, “The Doctrine of Illusion and `Error’ in Scheler’s Phenomenology,” Journal of Philosophy XXIV (1927), 621 13.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marvin Farber’s “Phenomenology as a Method and as a Philosophical Discipline” done at the University of Buffalo in 1928.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    In 1934, E. Parl Welch did a dissertation on Max Scheler’s Phenomenology of Religion at the University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Sweeney
    • 1
  1. 1.John Carroll UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations