Advertisement

Talmud: Making a Case for Talmud Pedagogy—The Talmud as an Educational Model

  • Marjorie Lehman
  • Jane Kanarek
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Religion and Education book series (IHRE, volume 5)

Abstract

The Babylonian Talmud (Bavli) stands at the canonical center of Jewish tradition. Composed between the third and seventh centuries C.E., the Bavli has been and continues to be studied in a variety of contexts, ranging from religious academies (yeshivot) to modern secular universities. Its study has resulted in a long chain of commentaries, including the almost line-by-line commentary of Rabbi Solomon Yitzhaki (Rashi, 1040/1–1105) and the medieval dialogical commentaries of the Tosafists. Legal codification was also an outgrowth of Talmudic analysis and interpretation and resulted in Isaac Alfasi’s (Rif, 1013–1103) Hilkhot Ha-rif and Moses Maimonides’ (Rambam, 1135–1204) Mishneh Torah, to cite two examples.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Jewish Identity Liberal Education Jewish Education Jewish Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albeck, H. (Ed.). (1988). Shishah Sidre Mishnah: With new commentary, introductions, additions, and completions (Vol. 6). Jerusalem: Mossad Bialik.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Menahem, H. (1991). Judicial deviation in Talmudic law: Governed by men, not by rules, Jewish Law in Context V. 1. Chur Switzerland. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, M. (1998). Towards the development of a Jewish Pedagogy: Rav Chiya’s vision of Torah education. In M. Haim (Ed.), Judaism and education: Essays in honor of Walter I. Ackerman (pp. 109–120). Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brookfield, S. (1988). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting, Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Epstein, J. N. (1962). In E. Z. Melamed (Ed.), Introduction to Amoraitic literature: Babylonian Talmud and Yerushalmi. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, S. “Benjamin and Minna Revees Chair Lecture.” http://www.atranet.co.il/sf/revees_chair.pdf.
  7. Goleman, L. (2008). Spotlight on theological education. American Academy of Religion Newsletter, 1.Google Scholar
  8. Hayman, P. (1997). On the teaching of Talmud: Toward a methodological basis for a curriculum in oral-tradition studies. Religious Education, 92(1), 61–76.Google Scholar
  9. Holzer, E. (2002). Conceptions of the study of Jewish texts in teachers’ professional development. Religious Education, 97(4), 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanarek, J. (2010). The pedagogy of slowing down: Teaching Talmud in a summer Kollel. Teaching Theology and Religion, 13(2), 15–34.Google Scholar
  11. Kleinfeld, J. (1988). “Learning to think like a teacher: The study of cases.” Alaska University, Fairbanks. Center for Cross-Cultural Studies. 2–36.Google Scholar
  12. Kraemer, D. C. (1981). Critical aids to teaching Talmud. Jewish Education, Spring, 37–40.Google Scholar
  13. Kress, J. S., & Lehman, M. (2003). The Babylonian Talmud in cognitive perspective: Reflections on the nature of the Bavli and Its pedagogical implications. Journal of Jewish Education, 69(2), 58–78.Google Scholar
  14. Lehman, M. (2002). For the love of Talmud: Reflections on the teaching of Bava Metzia, Perek 2. Journal of Jewish Education, 68(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehman, M. (2006). Examining the role of gender studies in teaching Talmudic literature. Journal of Jewish Education, 72(21), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mandel Center for Studies in Jewish Education. 2007. “Bibliography on Pedagogy of Jewish Studies,” Bridging Scholarship and Pedagogy in Jewish Studies. http://www.brandeis.edu/mandel/pdfs/Bridging_Initiative_Bibliography_6_07.pdf.
  17. Merseth, K. K. (1991). The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Metz, M. H. (1993). Teachers’ ultimate dependence on their students. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp.104–136). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Richert, A. E. (1991). Using teacher cases for reflection and understanding. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development for education in the ‘90 s: New demands, new realities, new perspectives (pp. 113–132). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenak, M. (1987). Commandments and concerns: Jewish religious education in secular society. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
  22. Rubenstein, J. L. (1999). Talmudic stories: Narrative art, composition, and culture. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Saiman, C. (2006). Legal theology: The Turn to conceptualism in nineteenth-century Jewish Law. Journal of Law and Religion, 21(1), 39–100.Google Scholar
  24. Shulman, L. S. (2004a). Aristotle had it right: On knowledge and pedagogy. In The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach (pp. 399–415). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Shulman, L. S. (2004b). Just in case: reflections on learning from experience. In The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach (pp. 461–482). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Shulman, J., & Sato, M. (2006). Mentoring teachers toward excellence: Supporting and developing highly qualified teachers, Jossey-Bass Education Series (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass published in partnership with WestEd.Google Scholar
  27. Twersky, I. (2003). What must a Jews study-and why. In S. Fox, I. Scheffler, & D. Marom (Eds.), Visions of Jewish education (pp. 47–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wasserman, S. (1994). Using cases to study teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(8), 602–610.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jewish Theological Seminary of AmericaNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Hebrew CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations