Skip to main content

Extensions of CERES

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 605 Accesses

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 34))

Abstract

In Chapter 6 the CERES method was defined as a cut-elimination method for LK-proofs. But the method is potentially much more general and can be extended to a wide range of first-order cacluli. First of all CERES is a semantic method, in the sense that it works for all sound sequent calculi with a definable ancestor relation and a semantically complete clausal calculus. In this chapter we first show that a CERES method can be defined for virtually any sound sequent calculus. Second, we define extensions of LK by equality and definitions rules which are useful for formalizing mathematical theorems and show how to adapt CERES to these extensions of LK. The extension LKDe defined in Section 7.3 will then be used for the analysis of mathematical proofs in Section 8.5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.vampire.fm/

  2. 2.

    http://spass.mpi-sb.mpg.de/

  3. 3.

    http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/AR/prover9/

References

  1. M. Baaz, A. Leitsch: Cut-Elimination and Redundancy-Elimination by Resolution. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 29, pp. 149–176, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Baaz, A. Leitsch: Towards a Clausal Analysis of Cut-Elimination. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 41, pp. 381–410, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Brauner, C. Houtmann, C. Kirchner: Principles of Superdeduction. Proceedings of LICS, pp. 41–50, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Degtyarev, A. Voronkov: Equality Reasoning in Sequent-Based Calculi. In: A. Robinson, A. Voronkov (eds.), Handbook of Automated Reasoning, vol. I, chapter 10, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 611–706, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Dowek, T. Hardin, C. Kirchner: Theorem Proving Modulo. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 31, pp. 32–72, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Dowek, B. Werner: Proof Normalization Modulo. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 68(4), pp. 1289–1316, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Eder: Relative Complexities of First-Order Calculi. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Gentzen: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39, pp. 405–431, 1934–1935.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Nieuwenhuis, A. Rubio: Paramodulation-Based Theorem Proving. In: J.A. Robinson, A. Voronkov (eds.), Handbook of Automated Reasoning, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 371–443, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Takeuti: Proof Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2nd edition, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Baaz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baaz, M., Leitsch, A. (2011). Extensions of CERES. In: Methods of Cut-Elimination. Trends in Logic, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0320-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics