Advertisement

Cut-Elimination by Resolution

Chapter
Part of the Trends in Logic book series (TREN, volume 34)

Abstract

In Chapter 5 we analyzed methods which eliminate cuts by stepwise reduction of cut-complexity. These methods always identify the uppermost logical operator in the cut-formula and either eliminate it directly (grade reduction) or indirectly (rank reduction). Here it is typical that, during grade reduction, the cut formulas are “peeled” from outside. These methods are local in the sense that only a small part of the whole proof is analyzed, namely the derivation corresponding to the introduction of the uppermost logical operator. As a consequence many types of redundancy in proofs are left undetected in these reductive methods, leading to bad computational behavior.

References

  1. 16.
    M. Baaz, A. Leitsch: On Skolemization and Proof Complexity. Fundamenta Informaticae, 20(4), pp. 353–379, 1994.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 17.
    M. Baaz, A. Leitsch: Cut Normal Forms and Proof Complexity. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 97, pp. 127–177, 1999.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 18.
    M. Baaz, A. Leitsch: Cut-Elimination and Redundancy-Elimination by Resolution. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 29, pp. 149–176, 2000.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 20.
    M. Baaz, A. Leitsch: Towards a Clausal Analysis of Cut-Elimination. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 41, pp. 381–410, 2006.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 41.
    K. Godden: Lazy Unification. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 180–187, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 51.
    D. Hilbert, P. Bernays: Grundlagen der Mathematik Band 2. Springer, Berlin, 1939.Google Scholar
  7. 54.
    U. Kohlenbach: Applied Proof Theory: Proof Interpretations and their Use in Mathematics. In Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. 61.
    A. Leitsch: The Resolution Calculus. EATCS Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 69.
    J.A. Robinson: A Machine Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle. Journal of the ACM 12(1), pp. 23–41, 1965.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  2. 2.Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations