Advertisement

Synthesis and Conclusions

  • Graeme S. Cumming
Chapter

Abstract

In this book I have attempted to provide the first comprehensive synthesis of a set of interrelated ideas that together create a foundation for an emerging field, the study of spatial resilience in social-ecological systems. Three key points about spatial resilience should by now be clear. First, although the explicit study of spatial resilience in social-ecological systems is a relatively new development, the concepts from which it developed have a long and illustrious history, with roots stretching back over 200 years (von Humboldt & Bonpland, 1807 (reprint 2010)). Spatial resilience offers a new way of looking at spatial phenomena in social-ecological systems, but it does not require overthrowing or disregarding the progress that many disciplines have made in our understanding of the importance of spatial variation for complex systems.

Keywords

Ecosystem Service Land Cover Change Resilience Theory Disciplinary Norm Land Cover Change Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adger, W. N., & Jordan, A. (2009). Sustainability: Exploring the processes and outcomes of governance (Chapter 1). In W. N. Adger & A. Jordan (Eds.), Governing sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bousquet, F., Castella, J. C., Trébuil, G., Barnaud, C., Boissau, S., & Kam, S. P. (2007). Using multi-agent systems in a companion modelling approach for agroecosystem management in South-East Asia. Outlook on Agriculture, 36, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22, 953–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P. (2009). Systems thinking, systems practice (with 30-year retrospective). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Cronon, W. (2000). Resisting monoliths and tabulae rasae. Ecological Applications, 10, 673–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cumming, G. S. (2007). Global biodiversity scenarios and landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 22, 671–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dieckmann, U. (1997). Can adaptive dynamics invade? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 128–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egas, M., Sabelis, M. W., & Dieckmann, U. (2005). Evolution of specialization and ecological character displacement of herbivores along a gradient of plant quality. Evolution, 59, 507–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland, J. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, July, 66–72.Google Scholar
  11. Houlahan, J. E., Currie, D. J., Cottenie, K., Cumming, G. S., Ernest, S. K. M., Findlay, C. S., et al. (2007). Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 3273–3277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janssen, M. A. (Ed.). (2002). Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mahanty, S., & Russell, D. (2002). High stakes: Lessons from stakeholder groups in the biodiversity conservation network. Society & Natural Resources, 15, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchell, M. (1996). An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Norberg, J., & Cumming, G. S. (2008). Complexity theory for a sustainable future (312 pp.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nystrom, M., & Folke, C. (2001). Spatial resilience of coral reefs. Ecosystems, 4, 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007). Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society, 12, 5 [online], http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss12/art15/
  19. Pickett, S. T. A., Jones, C., & Kolasa, J. (2007). Ecological understanding: The nature of theory and the theory of nature. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Plowright, R. K., Sokolow, S. H., Gorman, M. E., Daszak, P., & Foley, J. E. (2008). Causal inference in disease ecology: Investigating ecological drivers of disease emergence. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Appendix 2). New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Tabara, J. D., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 3.Google Scholar
  23. von Humboldt, A., & Bonpland, A. (1807 (reprint 2010)). Essay on the geography of plants (296 pp.). In S. T. Jackson (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, B., Carpenter, S. R., Anderies, J. M., Abel, N., Cumming, G. S., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G. D., & Pritchard, R. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 14. Retrieved from http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14/Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Percy FitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations