Scaling Laws and Complexity in Fire Regimes
Use of scaling terminology and concepts in ecology evolved rapidly from rare occurrences in the early 1980s to a central idea by the early 1990s (Allen and Hoekstra 1992; Levin 1992; Peterson and Parker 1998). In landscape ecology, use of “scale” frequently connotes explicitly spatial considerations (Dungan et al. 2002), notably grain and extent. More generally though, scaling refers to the systematic change of some biological variable with time, space, mass, or energy. Schneider (2001) further specifies ecological scaling sensu Calder (1983) and Peters (1983) as “the use of power laws that scale a variable (e.g., respiration) to body size, usually according to a nonintegral exponent” while noting that this is one of many equally common technical definitions. He further notes that “the concept of scale is evolving from verbal expression to quantitative expression” (p. 545), and will continue to do so as mathematical theory matures along with quantitative methods for extrapolating across scales.
KeywordsFire Regime Neutral Model Fire Spread Fire Occurrence Fire Size
- Adamic, L.A., and B.A. Huberman. 2000. The nature of markets in the World Wide Web. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 1: 512.Google Scholar
- Agee, J.K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Allen, T.F.H., and T.W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Cello, G., and B.D. Malamud. eds. 2006. Fractal analysis for natural hazards. Special publication 261. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
- Clauset, A., C.R. Shalizi, and M.E.J. Newman. 2007. Power law distributions in empirical data. (http://arXiv:0706.1062v1).Google Scholar
- Cohen, J.D., and J.E. Deeming. 1985. The national fire danger rating system: basic equations. General Technical Report PSW-82. Berkeley: Forest Service.Google Scholar
- Diggle, P.J. 2003. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
- Evans, M., N. Hastings, and B. Peacock. 2000. Statistical distributions, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Falk, D.A. 2004. Scale dependence of probability models for fire intervals in a ponderosa pine ecosystem. Ph.D. dissertation. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
- Gardner, R.H., and D.L. Urban. 2007. Neutral models for testing landscape hypotheses. Landscape Ecology 22: 15–29.Google Scholar
- Gwozdz, R., and D. McKenzie. (unpublished data) Effects of topography, humidity, and model parameters on the spatial structure of simulated fine-fuel moisture. Seattle: Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Lab, U.S. Forest Service (manuscript on file with: Don McKenzie).Google Scholar
- Isaaks, E.H., and R.M. Srivastava. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
- Malamud, B.D., Millington, J.D.A., and G.L.W. Perry. 2005. Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102:4694–4699.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, D. [N.d.]. Unpublished data. Seattle: Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Lab (On file with: Don McKenzie).Google Scholar
- McKenzie, D., L-K.B. Kellogg, D.A. Falk, C. Miller, and A.E. Black. 2006b. Scaling laws and fire-size distributions in historical low-severity fire regimes. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 8: 1607–7962/gra/EGU06–A–01436.Google Scholar
- Millington, J.D.A., G.L.W. Perry, and B.D. Malamud. 2006. Models, data, and mechanisms: quantifying wildfire regimes. In Fractal analysis for natural hazards, eds. G. Cello, and B.D. Malamud, 155–167. Special Publication 261. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
- National Geophysical Data Center. 2010. NGDC: natural hazards databases at NGDC. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazard/hazards.shtml. Accessed 25 Jan 2010.
- NOAA. 2010. International multiproxy paleofire database. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/impd/paleofire.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2010.
- O’Neill, R.V., D.L. deAngelis, J.B. Waide, and T.F.H. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Peterson, D.L., and V.T. Parker, eds. 1998. Ecological scale: theory and applications. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- R Foundation. 2003. The R Project for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 25 Jan 2010.
- Stauffer, D., and A. Aharony. 1994. Introduction to percolation theory, 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Wu, J. 1999. Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 367–380.Google Scholar
- Zipf, G.K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar