Advertisement

Stochastic subspace projection schemes for dynamic analysis of uncertain systems

  • Prasanth B. Nair
Part of the IUTAM Bookseries book series (IUTAMBOOK, volume 27)

Abstract

We present stochastic subspace projection schemes for dynamic response analysis of linear stochastic structural systems. The underlying idea of the numerical methods presented here is to approximate the response process using a set of stochastic basis vectors with undetermined coefficients that are estimated via orthogonal/oblique stochastic projection. We present a preconditioned stochastic conjugate gradient method based on the conjugate orthogonality condition for approximating the frequency response statistics of stochastic structural systems. We also outline a new stochastic projection scheme for solving the generalized algebraic random eigenvalue problem. Some preliminary results are presented for a model problem to illustrate the performance of the proposed methods.

Keywords

Conjugate Gradient Method Frequency Response Function Uncertain System Krylov Subspace Projection Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ghanem, R. and Spanos, P., Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, Springer-Verlag, 1991. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deb, M.K., Babuska, I.M. and Oden, J.T., “Solution of stochastic partial differential equations using Galerkin finite element techniques,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 190, 2001, pp. 6359–6372. zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarkar, A. and Ghanem, R., “Mid-frequency structural dynamics with parameter uncertainty,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191, 2002, pp. 5499–5513. zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nair, P.B. and Keane, A.J., “Stochastic reduced basis methods,” AIAA Journal, 40, 2002, pp. 1653–1664. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nair, P.B., “Projection schemes in stochastic finite element analysis,” CRC Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, Chapter 21, editors: E. Nikolaidis, D.M.E. Ghiocel and S.E. Singhal, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2004. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghanem, R. and Ghosh, D., “Efficient characterization of the random eigenvalue problem in a polynomial chaos decomposition,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 72, 2007, pp. 486–504. zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bah, M.T., Nair, P.B., Bhaskar, A. and Keane, A.J., “Forced response analysis of mistuned bladed disks: A stochastic reduced basis approach,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 263, 2003, pp. 377–397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hakansson, P. and Nair, P.B., “Conjugate gradient methods for randomly parameterized linear random algebraic equations,” submitted for review. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vand der Vorst, H.A. and Melissen, J.B.M., “A Petrov-Galerkin type method for solving Ax=b, where A is a symmetric complex matrix,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 26, 1990, pp. 706–708. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nair, P.B. and Keane, A.J., “An approximate solution scheme for the algebraic random eigenvalue problem,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 260, 2003, pp. 45–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bathe, K.J. and Wilson, E.L., “Large eigenvalue problems in dynamic analysis,” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 98, 1972, pp. 1471–1485. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paige, C.C. and Saunders, M.A., “Solution of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations,” SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 12, 1975, pp. 617–629. zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Engineering and Design Group, School of Engineering SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations