Advertisement

Simulation of a Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engine Subsystem

Chapter
  • 1.6k Downloads
Part of the Scientific Computation book series (SCIENTCOMP)

Abstract

From an engineering point of view, CFD is a tool for preliminary design, design improvement, risk analysis, mission planning and operations. In this chapter, we will present engineering aspects of CFD through a task where CFD has played a significant role in accomplishing the goal of a real mission.

Keywords

Boundary Layer Thickness Internal Flow Separation Bubble Algebraic Model Main Injector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Deardorff, J. W.: The use of subgrid scale transport equations in a three-dimensional model of atmospheric turbulence. J. Fluid Eng., 95, 429–438 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fox, D. G., Lilly, D. K.: Numerical simulation of turbulent flows. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 10, No. 1, 51 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gillis, J. C., Johnston, J. P.: Turbulent boundary-layer flow and structure on a convex wall and its redevelopment on a flat wall. J. Fluid Mech., 135, 123–153 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Reynolds, W. C.: Computation of turbulent flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 8, 183–208 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 93, No. 3, 99 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Van Driest, E. R.: On turbulent flow near a wall. J. Aeronautical Sci., 23, No. 11, 1007–1011, 1036 (1956)Google Scholar
  7. Wattendorf, F. L.: A study of the effect of curvature on fully developed turbulent flow. Proc. Roy. Soc., 148, 565–598 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin, B. S., Lomax, H.: Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 78-257 (l978)Google Scholar
  9. Belie, G.: Flow visualization in the space shuttle’s main engine. Cover Story, Mechanical Engineering, September 1985 issue (1985)Google Scholar
  10. Bradshaw, P.: Effect of curvature on turbulent flow. AGARD-AG-169 (1973)Google Scholar
  11. Burke, R. W.: Computation of turbulent incompressible wing-body junction flow. Proceedings of the 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 9–12, AIAA Paper 89-0279 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. Chang, J. L. C., Kwak, D., Dao, S. C., Rosen, R.: A three dimensional incompressible flow simulation method and its application to the Space Shuttle main engine – Part II, Turbulent Flow. AIAA Paper 85-1670 (1985b)Google Scholar
  13. Chang, J. L. C., Kwak, D.: Numerical study of turbulent internal shear layer flow in an axi-symmetric U-duct. AIAA Paper 88-0596 (1988a)Google Scholar
  14. Chen, Y. S., Sandborn, V. A.: Computational and experimental study of turbulent flows in 180-degree bends. AIAA Paper 86-1516 (1986)Google Scholar
  15. Kwak, D., Reynolds, W. C., Ferziger, J. H.: Three-dimensional time dependent computation of turbulent flow. TF-5, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University (1975)Google Scholar
  16. Leonard, A.: On the energy cascade in large-eddy simulation of turbulent fluid flows. TF-1, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, or Adv. Geophys., 1, No. 18A, 237 (1973)Google Scholar
  17. Lin, S.-J., Yang, R.-J., Chang, J. L. C., Kwak, D.: Numerical simulation of flow path in the oxidizer side hot gas manifold of the Space Shuttle main engine. AIAA Paper 87-1800 (1987)Google Scholar
  18. Monson, D. J., Seegmiller, H. L., McConnaughey, P. K.: Comparison of LDV measurements and Navier-Stokes solutions in a two-dimensional 180-degree turn-around duct. AIAA Paper 89-0275 (1989)Google Scholar
  19. Monson, D. J., Seegmiller, H. L.: An experimental investigation of subsonic flow in a two-dimensional U-duct. NASA TM 103931, July (1992)Google Scholar
  20. Moser, R. D., Moin, P.: Direct numerical simulation of curved turbulent channel flow. NASA TM 85974 (1984)Google Scholar
  21. Nikuradse, J.: Laws of turbulent flow in smooth pipes (1932) (English Translation) NASA TT F-10 (1966)Google Scholar
  22. Prandtl, L.: Effects of stabilizing forces on turbulence. NACA TM 625 (1931) (original version in 1929)Google Scholar
  23. Sandborn, V. A.: Measurement of turbulent flow quantities in a rectangular duct with 180-degree bend. NASA CP 3012, Advanced Earth-to-Orbit Propulsion Technology, II, 292–304, Proceedings of the Conference at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, May (1988)Google Scholar
  24. Sharma, L., Ostermier, B., Nguyen, L., Dang, P., O'Connor, G.: Turbulence measurements in an axisymmetric turnaround duct air flow model. Rocketdyne Division, Rockwell International, Report RSS-8763, ATU-87-5237, October (1987)Google Scholar
  25. Spalart, P. R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S. R.: Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, August 4–8 (1997)Google Scholar
  26. Yang, R.-J., Chang, J. L. C., Kwak, D.: A Navier-Stokes simulation of the Space Shuttle main engine hot gas manifold. AIAA Paper 87-0368 (1987) (Also J. Spacecraft Rockets, 29, No. 2, 253–259, 1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NASA Advanced Supercomputing DivisionNASA Ames Research CenterMoffet FieldUSA
  2. 2.NASA Ames Research Center, Applied Modeling & Simulations BranchMoffett FieldUSA

Personalised recommendations