Abstract
For more than a century, biogeographers have sought to explain the large number of species found in Amazonian forests. The role of rivers as barriers to dispersal was recognized early on and this was the first evolutionary hypothesis to explain Amazonian diversity. Most of the recent debate on speciation in the Amazon has focused on the role of Pleistocene refugia. The methods of refuge biogeography helped shape early conservation priorities in Amazonia, although actual plans did not directly depend on the conceptual strengths or weaknesses of refugia biogeography. These approaches viewed people mostly as threats, though not always explicitly. Based on his work on primate distribution, Márcio Ayres formulated a synthetic speciation theory, the river-refuge hypothesis. The river-refuge model successfully resolved some of the historical and technical challenges of the earlier hypotheses. His work in várzea conservation, informed by this conceptual breakthrough, recognized that the maintenance of processes is at least as important as species numbers in prioritizing action. The work of Márcio Ayres broadened the scope of conservation in Amazonia by moving beyond the model of people-as-threats, and this was as great a conceptual contribution to conservation as anyone could make.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ayres, J. M. (1986a). The conservation status of the white uakari. Primate Conservation, 7, 22–26.
Ayres, J. M. (1986b). Uakaris and Amazonian flooded forest. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Ayres, J. M., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1992). River boundaries and species range size in Amazonian primates. The American Naturalist, 140, 531–537.
Ayres, J. M., & Johns, A. D. (1987). Conservation of white uacaries in Amazonian várzea. Oryx, 6, 74–80.
Bates, H. W. (1863). The naturalist on the river Amazon. London: Murray.
Burgess, N. D., Hales, J. D. A., Ricketts, T. H., & Dinerstein, E. (2006). Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands. Biological Conservation, 127, 383–401.
Capparella, A. P. (1988). Genetic variation in neotropical birds: Implication for the speciation process. In H. Ouellet (Ed.), Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Capparella, A. P. (1991). Neotropical avian diversity and riverine barriers. In B. D. Bell (Ed.), Proceedings 20th international ornithological congress. Wellington, New Zealand: Congressional Trust Board.
Croizat, L. (1981). Biogeography: Past, present, and future. In G. Nelson & D. E. Rosen (Eds.), Vicariance biogeography: A critique. New York: Columbia University Press.
Darlington, P. J., Jr. (1957). Zoogeography: The geographical distribution of animals. New York: John Wiley.
Endler, J. A. (1982). Problems in distinguishing historical from ecological factors in biogeography. American Zoologist, 22, 441–452.
Fjeldså, J. (1994). Geographical patterns for relict and young species of birds in Africa and South America and implications for conservation priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 3, 207–226.
Haffer, J. (1969). Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science, 165, 131–137.
Haffer, J. (1993). Time’s cycle and time’s arrow in the history of Amazonia. Biogeographica, 69, 15–45.
Haffer, J. (1997). Alternative models of speciation in Amazonia: an overview. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 451–476.
Hayes, F. E., & Sewlal, J. A. N. (2004). The Amazon river as a dispersal barrier to passerine birds: Effects of river width, habitat and taxonomy. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 1809–1818.
Hershkovitz, P. (1977). Living new world Monkeys (Platyrrhini). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Junk, W. J., Bayley, P. B., & Sparks, R. E. (1989). The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106, 110–127.
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., et al. (2002). Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: A 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16, 605–618.
Laurance, W. F., Vasconcelos, H. L., & Lovejoy, T. E. (2000). Forest loss and fragmentation in the Amazon: Implications for wildlife conservation. Oryx, 34, 39–45.
Laurance, W. F., Oliveira, A. A., Laurance, S. G., Condit, R., Nascimento, H. E. M., Sanchez-Thorin, A. C., et al. (2004). Pervasive alteration of tree communities in undisturbed Amazonian forests. Nature, 428, 171–175.
Lovejoy, T. E. (1982). Designing refugia for tomorrow. In G. T. Prance (Ed.), Biological diversification in the tropics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lovejoy, T. E. (1983). The science of Amazon conservation. The Environmentalist, 3, 57–61.
Martins, E. S., Ayres, J. M., & Ribeiro de Valle, M. B. (1988). On the status of Ateles belzebuth marginatus with notes on other primates of the Iriri river basin. Primate Conservation, 9, 87–91.
Morrone, J. J., & Crisci, J. V. (1995). Historical biogeography: Introduction to methods. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 373–401.
Nelson, B. W., Ferreira, C. A. C., da Silva, M. F., & Kawasaki, M. L. (1990). Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature, 345, 714–716.
Neumann, R. P. (1996). Dukes, earls, and ersatz Edens: Aristocratic nature preservationists in colonial Africa. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 14, 79–98.
Neumann, R. P. (1997). Primitive ideas: Protected area buffer zones and the politics of land in Africa. Development and Change, 28, 559–582.
Nores, M. (1999). An alternative hypothesis for the origin of Amazonian bird diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 475–485.
Nores, M. (2004). The implications of tertiary and quaternary sea level rise events for avian distribution patterns in the lowlands of northern South America. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13, 149–161.
Oren, D. C. (1982). Testing the refuge model for South America: A hypothesis to evaluate discrepancies in refuges number across taxa. In G. T. Prance (Ed.), Biological diversification in the tropics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Patton, J. L., Da Silva, M. N. F., & Malcolm, J. R. (1994). Gene genealogy and differentiation among arboreal spiny rats (Rodentia: Echimyidae) of the Amazon basin: A test of the riverine barrier hypothesis. Evolution, 48, 1314–1323.
Peres, C. A. (2001). Paving the way to the future of Amazonia. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 217–219.
Peres, C. A. (2005). Why we need megareserves in Amazonia. Conservation Biology, 19, 728–733.
Peres, C. A., & Terborgh, J. W. (1995). Amazonian nature reserves: An analysis of the defensibility status of existing conservation units and design criteria for the future. Conservation Biology, 9, 34–46.
Pitman, N. C. A., & Jorgensen, P. M. (2002). Estimating the size of the world’s threatened flora. Science, 298, 989.
Prance, G. T. (1982). Biological diversification in the tropics. In G. T. Prance (Ed.), Biological diversification in the tropics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ribas, C. C., Gaban-Lima, R., Miyaki, C. Y., & Cracraft, J. (2005). Historical biogeography and diversification within the neotropical parrot genus Pionopsitta (Aves: Psittacidae). Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1409–1427.
Vanzolini, P. E., & Williams, E. E. (1970). South American anoles: The geographic differentiation and evolution of the Anolis chrysolepis species group (Sauria, Iguanidae). Arquivo Zoologico do Sao Paulo, 19, 1–298.
Wallace, A. R. (1853). A narrative of travels on the Amazon and Rio Negro, with an account of the native tribes, and observations on the climate, geology, and natural history of the Amazon valley. London: Reeve & Co.
Wallace, A. R. (1876). The geographical distribution of animals; with a study of the relations of living and extinct faunas as elucidating the past changes of the earth’s surface. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Wallace, A. R. (1881). Island life; or, the phenomena and causes of insular faunas and floras, including a revision and attempted solution of the problem of geological climates. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Wallace, R. B., Painter, R. L. E., Taber, A. B., & Ayres, J. M. (1996). Notes on a distributional river boundary and southern range extension for two species of Amazonian primates. Neotropical Primates, 4, 149–151.
Wetterberg, G. B., Prance, G. T., & Lovejoy, T. E. (1981). Conservation progress in Amazonia: A structural review. Parks, 6, 5–10.
Whinnett, A., Zimmermann, M., Willmott, K. R., Herrera, N., Mallarino, R., Simpson, F., et al. (2005). Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly ‘suture zone’. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2525–2533.
Williams, P. H., Margules, C. R., & Hilbert, D. W. (2002). Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection. Journal of Biosciences, 27, 327–338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinedo-Vasquez, M.A., Dávalos, L.M. (2011). The River-Refuge Hypothesis and Other Contributions of Márcio Ayres to Conservation Science. In: Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Ruffino, M., Padoch, C., Brondízio, E. (eds) The Amazon Várzea . Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0146-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0146-5_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0145-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0146-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)