Advertisement

Behaviour, Environment or Body: Three Discourses on Obesity

  • Tsjalling SwierstraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 18)

Abstract

To this present day, assessing the ethical, legal and social implications of genomics is by and large assessing the future. Most of the implications of genomics have yet to manifest them selves. How will society be affected by applications of genomics to obesity, medicine and food? How will ethics be affected? To start answering these questions we cannot but begin in the present. The society we belong to forms the cradle of the new genomics and the medium in which the implications of genomics will manifest themselves. Existing social, cultural, moral and economic constellations co-determine the shape, speed and direction of future technological developments.

Keywords

Healthy Weight Excess Body Weight Obese Person Moral Condemnation Weight Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

I want to thank Henk van den Belt, Michiel Korthals and Jozef Keulartz for their input and comments.

References

  1. Ainslie, G. (2001), Breakdown of Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Appleson, G. (2002), McDonald’s tries to spit out obesity lawsuit, Reuters/Yahoo! News. 20/11, Available on http://www.mcspotlight.org [Accessed April 2005]
  3. Aristotle (1982), The Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Critser, G. (2003), Fat Land: How Americans Became the Fattest People in the World. Mariner Books Boston, Mass.: 1st Mariner Books ed. Houghton Mifflin CoGoogle Scholar
  5. de Beaufort, I. (2002), Justice, genetics, and lifestyles. In: Burley, J. and Harris, J. (eds), A Companion to Genethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 325–333Google Scholar
  6. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff L. (eds) (2002), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Science, Technology and International Political Economy. London: ContinuumGoogle Scholar
  7. Food Standard Agency (2003), Does Food Promotion Influence Children? A Systematic Review of the Evidence. London http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/fsa040302annex5.pdf
  8. Gosling, J.C.B. (1990) Weakness of the Will. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson, L.E. (2003) The relationship of urban design to human health and condition, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 4, 191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knoppers, B.M., R. Chadwick, H. Takebe et al. (2000) HUGO urges genetic benefit-sharing. Community Genetics 3: 88–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Korthals, M. (2004) Before Dinner. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  12. Nestlé, M. (2002) Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Oksenberg-Rorty, A. (ed) (2001) The Many Faces of Evil. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Parsons, T.J., C. Power, S. Logan and C.D. Summerbell (1999) Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review, International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 23, Suppl 8, S1–S107Google Scholar
  15. Pereboom, D. (2002) Living Without Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Resnik, D. (1998) Ethics of Research. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Rigotti, F. (2002) Philosophie in der Küche. Kleine Kritik der kulinarischen Vernunft. München: CH Beck VerlagGoogle Scholar
  18. Shell, E.R. (2002) The Hungry Gene. London: Atlantic BooksGoogle Scholar
  19. Shin-Yi, C., M. Grossman and H. Saffer. (2004) An economic analysis of adult obesity: Results from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, Journal of Health Economics, 23, 3, 565–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singer, P.A. and A.S. Daar. (2001) Harnessing genomics and biotechnology to improve global health equity, Science, 294, 87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stronks, K. and J. Hulshof (2001), De kloof verkleinen, theorie en praktijk van de strijd tegen sociaal-economische gezondheidsverschillen. Netherlands: Van Gorcum b.v., 231 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Sugar industry threatens to scupper WHO (2003), The Guardian, April 21Google Scholar
  23. Swinburn, B., G. Egger and F. Raza (1999) Dissecting obesogenic environments: The development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity, Preventive Medicine, 29, 563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thackray, A. (ed) (1998) Private Science. Biotechnology and the Rise of the Molecular Sciences. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia PressGoogle Scholar
  25. van den Belt, H. (2003) Debating the precautionary principle: Guilty until proven innocent or innocent until proven guilty? Plant Physiology, 132, 1122–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vulliamy, E. (2002), Super-sized teenagers sue McDonald’s, The Observer, 24/11/02Google Scholar
  27. Weiser, B. (2003), Big macs can make you fat? No kidding, a judge rules, New York Times 23/01/03 http://www.mcspotlight.org [Accessed April 2005]
  28. What’s so unhealthy about McDonald’s food? (1986) http://www.mcspotlight.org
  29. WHO (2003), Report Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations