Advertisement

Genomics and Obesity from a Pragmatist Point of View

  • Michiel KorthalsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 18)

Abstract

An ethical study like this on the relationship between genomics, society and obesity requires a clear perspective, one that does not work as a barrier to new insights but rather provides a guideline for identifying new aspects. In this chapter we discuss our perspective generally in the first section, then give an overview of genomics and obesity, next discuss the main trends that we want to explore in this study and finally present ideas what pragmatism can mean in relation to genomics and obesity. We will in the last section explain on the base of these considerations the overall structure of the book.

Keywords

Substantive Issue Health Care Practice Food Practice Pragmatist Point Food Ethic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Buchanan, A., D. Brock, N. Daniels and D. Wikler (2000), From Chance to Choice: Genes and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgess, M. (2007), Proposing modesty for informed consent, Social Science and Medicine, 65, 11, 2284–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brudnak, A. (2001), Nutritional regulation of gene expression, Theory in Biosciences – Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 120, 1, 64–75Google Scholar
  4. Caulfield, T., R. Upshur and A. Daar (2003), DNA databanks and consent, MBC Medical Ethics, 4, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dekker, M., R. Verkerk and W.M.F. Jongen (2000), Predictive modelling of health aspects in the food production chain: a case study on glucosinolates in cabbage, Trends Food Science & Technology, 11, 174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1960), The Quest For Certainty. New York: Capricorn BooksGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirschman, A.E. (1970), Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Horstman, K., G.H. de Vries and O. Haveman (1999), Gezondheidspolitiek in een risico cultuur. Den Haag: RathenauGoogle Scholar
  9. James, W., The Will to Believe (or. 1897), in: L. Menand (ed. 1997), Pragmatism, New York: VintageGoogle Scholar
  10. Kasteren, J. (2001), Gentechnologie, Genomics en Consument. Den Haag: Consument en BiotechnologieGoogle Scholar
  11. Keulartz, J., M. Korthals, M. Schermer and T. Swierstra (2002), Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  12. Korthals, M. (2001), Dilemmas in sustainable agriculture, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 36, 813–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Neill, O. (2002), Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Rahilly, S. (2007), Lof der Geneeskunst, Lecture [Praise of Medicine], lecture, Erasmus University, September 29, 2007Google Scholar
  15. Rowe, G. and L. Frewer (2000), Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation, Science Technology and Human Values, 25, 1, 3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thayer, H.S. (1981), Meaning and Action. New York, NY: HackettGoogle Scholar
  17. van Boekel, M.A.J.S. (2001), Van disciplines naar ontwerpen, WAU Inaugural Lecture, Wageningen: Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Werf, v.d.M., F. Schuren, S. Bijlsma, A. Tas and B. van Ommen (2001), Nutrigenomics: Application of genomics technologies in nutritional sciences and food technology, Journal of Food Science, 66, 6, 772–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied PhilosophyWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations