Advertisement

Prevention of Obesity and Personalized Nutrition: Public and Private Health

  • Michiel KorthalsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 18)

Abstract

As we stated in Chapter 5, two of three main areas of ethical concern connected with nutrigenomics are the relationship between public or social health and nutrition and personalized or individualized health and nutrition and the relation between food and health. Efficacy reasons (Lang and Heasman, 2005, 118) or ethical reasons (UKPHA, 2004) are called upon to support public health policies.

Keywords

Food Choice Ethical Concern Genetic Profile Individual Autonomy Personalized Nutrition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. BBC-News (2005), DNA test for diabetes and obesity, Health Retrieved, 7 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  2. Cain, M. and G. Schmid (2003), From Nutrigenomics Science to Personalized Nutrition: The Market in 2010. Palo Alto, CA: The Institute for the FutureGoogle Scholar
  3. Castle, D. (2003), Clinical challenges posed by new biotechnology: The case of nutrigenomics, Post-Graduate Medical Journal, 79, 65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castle, D., C. Cline, A.S. Daar, P.A. Singer and C. Tsamis (2006), Science, Society and the Supermarket: The Opportunities and Challenges of Nutrigenomics. Hoboken, NJ: WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. Chadwick, R. (2004), Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 1, 161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawford, R. (1980), Healthism and the medicalization of every day, International Journal of Health Services, 10, 3, 365–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darnton-Hill, I., B. Margetts and R. Deckelbaum. (2004), Public health nutrition and genetics: Implications for nutrition policy and promotion, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 1, 173–185(13)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Della Penna, D. (1999), Nutritional genomics: Manipulating plant micronutrients to improve human health, Science, 285, 375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El-Sohemy, A. (2007), Nutrigenomics of taste – impact on food preferences and food production. In: El-Sohemy A., L.Stewart, L.Khataan, B.Fontaine-Bisson, P.Kwong, S.Ozsungur, M.Cornelis, E.S.Tai and P.J. Gillies (eds), Nutrigenomics – Opportunities in Asia. Forum Nutr. vol. 60, Basel: Karger, pp. 176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eurobarometer (2005), Risk Issues. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_238_en.pdf [Accessed June 2006]
  11. Food Ethics Council (2005), Getting Personal: Shifting Responsibilities for Health. Brighton: Food Ethics CouncilGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman, J.F. (2004), Modern science versus the stigma of obesity, Nature medicine, 10, 6, 563–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. German, J.B. and H.J. Watzke (2004), Personalizing foods for health and delight, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 3, 145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hillsdon, M., C. Foster, B. Naidoo and H. Crombie (2004), The effectiveness of public health interventions for increasing physical activity among adults: A review of reviews. Evidence briefing of the NHS Health Development Agency. http://www.hda.nhs.uk/evidence [Accessed June 2006] London
  15. Kant I. (1949), Critique of practical reason and other writings in moral philosophy. In: Beck L.W. (trans and ed) . Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 263–92Google Scholar
  16. Kaput, J. and R.L. Rodriguez (2004), Nutritional genomics: The next frontier in the postgenomic era. Physiological, Genomics, 16, 166–177, PMID: 14726599Google Scholar
  17. Khoury, M.J. and G.A. Mensah (2005), Genomics and the Prevention and Control of Common Chronic Diseases: Emerging Priorities for Public Health Action. Prev Chronic Dis (serial online) 2005 Apr. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/apr/05_0011.htm [Accessed June 2006]
  18. Koelen, M.A. and B. Lindström (2005), Making healthy choices the easy choices: The role of empowerment, EJCN, 59, 1, S10–S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korsmeyer, C. (2002), Making Sense of Taste. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Korthals, M. (2004), Before Dinner: Philosophy and Ethics of Food. Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  21. Lang, T. and M. Heasman (2005), Foodwars. London: EarthscanGoogle Scholar
  22. Mill, J.S. (1975), On Liberty, in: idem, Three Essays. Oxford: Oford University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. O‘Neill, O. (2002), Public health or clinical ethics: Thinking beyond borders, Ethics and International Affairs, 16, 35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petrini, C. (2002), The Pleasures of Slow Food: Celebrating Authentic Traditions, Flavors and Recipes. Chronicle Books LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Rose, G. (1995), Sick Individuals and sick populations, International Journal of Epidemiology, 14, 1, 32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roth, J., X. Qiang et al. (2004), The obesity pandemic: Where have we been and where are we going?, Obesity Research, 12, Supplement, 88S–100SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sinha, G. (2005), The diet that fits – analyzing metabolism for personalized nutrition, Scientific American, 292, 3, 22–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tate, T.K. and D.B. Goldstein (2004), Will tomorrow’s medicines work for everyone?, Nature Genetics, 36, 11, S34–S42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. UK Department of Health (2004), Choosing Health UK Department of Health. LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. UKPHA (2004), Public Health Association: Choosing health or losing health? UK Public Health Association LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. WHO (2005), The Bangkok Charter for health Promotion in a Globalized World. WHO. August 2005, available on http://www.who.int [Accessed June 2010]

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied PhilosophyWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations