This paper explores a problem involved in defining the act utilitarian notion of a “right action” within the framework of stit semantics. The problem is there seem to be two different, and conflicting, ways of defining this idea, both intuitively attractive. Previous work has addressed this problem by developing separate theories to account for our conflicting intuitions. This paper shows that the problem can also be addressed through a single theory that allows actions to assessed from different perspectives.
Conditional Optimality Unique History Utilitarian Theory Dominance Sense Conditional Dominance
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Belnap N (2001) Double time references: speech act reports as modalities in an indeterministic setting. In: Wolter F, Wansing H, de Rijke M, Zakharyaschev M (eds) Advances in modal logic, vol 3, CSLI Publications, Stanford pp 1–21Google Scholar
Belnap N (2004) Future contingents and the sea battle tomorrow, manuscript, Philosophy Department, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar
Belnap N, Perloff M, Xu M (2001) Facing the future: Agents and choices in our indeterminist world. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bergström L (1966) The alternatives and consequences of actions, Stockholm Studies in Philosophy, vol 4. Almqvist and Wiksell, StockholmGoogle Scholar
Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Prior A (1956) The consequences of actions. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 30, Harrison and SonsGoogle Scholar
Prior A (1967) Past, present, and future. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ramsey F (1931) Truth and probability. In: Braithwaite RB (ed) The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Oxford pp 156–191, originally published in 1926Google Scholar
Regan D (1980) Utilitarianism and co-operation. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Savage L (1951) The theory of statistical decision. Journal of the American Statistics Association 46:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage L (1954) The foundations of statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York second revised edition published by Dover Publications, 1972Google Scholar