Advertisement

The Collegiate University in Retreat?

  • Ted TapperEmail author
  • David Palfreyman
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 34)

Abstract

Much of the diagnosis of British higher education, past and present, has made frequent use of cataclysmic language. It is not uncommon to perceive the universities as in a state of crisis from which they will recover only if they succeed in radically reshaping themselves (Moberley, 1949, The Crisis of the University; Scott, 1984, The Crisis of the University). Their values, purposes, procedures and structures – not to mention their personnel – are all too frequently seen as ineffective in the light of prevailing circumstances. They need root and branch reform if they are to survive. Such foreboding has never been more sharply pronounced than in the past 30 years as the established system has found itself ever more tightly controlled by the dictates of successive governments and now about to face significant cuts in funding for teaching as the government attempts to reduce public expenditure.

Keywords

Collegial Tradition Research Assessment Exercise Federal Structure Federal Model Academic Title 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baty, P. (1999, January 29). Dons prepare for contracts battle. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 60.Google Scholar
  2. Baty, P. (1999, 5 March). Oxford agrees to subsidise college fee cut. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 60.Google Scholar
  3. Baty, P. (1999, 19 March). Cambridge hit by cut to fee incomes. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 3.Google Scholar
  4. Brock, M. (1994). The university since 1970. In B. Harrison (Ed.), The history of the University of Oxford, Volume VIII: The twentieth century (pp. 739–774). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, P., & Scase, R. (1994). Higher education and corporate realities. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Paris: IAU Press.Google Scholar
  7. Curthoys, M. C. (1997a). The ‘unreformed’ colleges. In M. G. Brock & M. C. Curthoys (Eds.), The history of the University of Oxford: Volume VI: Nineteenth-century Oxford, Part 1 (pp. 146–173). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Editorial. (1998, June 26). The pros and cons of intervention. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 13.Google Scholar
  9. Engel, A. (1983). From clergyman to don: The rise of the academic profession in nineteenth-century Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, G. R. (1999a). Calling academia to account: Rights and responsibilities. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.Google Scholar
  11. Moberley, W. H. (1949). The crisis of the university. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  12. Palfreyman, D. (1996). Oxford fellows as charity trustees. Charity Law and Practice Review, 3(3), 187–202.Google Scholar
  13. Palfreyman, D. (1998). Oxford colleges: Permanent endowment, charity trusteeship and personal liability. Charity Law and Practice Review, 5(2), 85–134.Google Scholar
  14. Palfreyman, D. (1999b). Is porterhouse really “a charity”? Charity Law and Practice Review, 6(2), 151–166.Google Scholar
  15. Ryan, A. (1997, 12 December). Yankee Oxfords. Times Higher Education Supplement, 27.Google Scholar
  16. Scott, P. (1984). The crisis of the university. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  17. Stevens, R. (1998, 24 March). Barbarians at the gate: A view from Oxford’s city wall. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  18. Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2010). The collegial tradition in the age of mass higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. University of Cambridge. (1962, March 13). Reporter, Bridges Syndicate.Google Scholar
  20. University of Cambridge. (1989, 19 May 19). Reporter, Wass Syndicate.Google Scholar
  21. University of Oxford. (1997a). Commission of inquiry: Report, North Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. University of Oxford. (1997b). Commission of inquiry: Supplementary volume, North Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. University of Oxford. (1998). Undergraduate prospectus for entry in 1999–2000. Oxford: Oxford Colleges Admissions Office.Google Scholar
  24. University of Oxford. (2009, January). Governance report to council. Oxford: Audit and Scrutiny Committee.Google Scholar
  25. Warren, R. C. (1997). Corporate temperance in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 1(3), 82–87.Google Scholar
  26. Windolf, P. (1988). Education as a screening device. In P. Windolf & S. Wood (Eds.). Recruitment and selection in the labour market (pp. 163–198). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OtterbourneUK
  2. 2.Oxford Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies, New CollegeOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations