Rotordynamics Research: Current Interests and Future Directions

Conference paper
Part of the IUTAM Bookseries book series (IUTAMBOOK, volume 1011)

Abstract

The level of understanding of machinery dynamics is higher today than was ever thought possible 35 years ago. In fact, a major source of excitation was overlooked and thought to be coming from aerodynamic excitation forces in centrifugal compressors. The evaluation of instability mechanisms has advanced to the point that standard procedures are currently being proposed for all petrochemical rotating machinery. While this all sounds so fine, a closer look reveals that much more work is necessary to fully understand the machinery being built today and the advanced technology machinery that will be needed in future years. Most major universities are not interested in machinery dynamics research due to the low level of funding that the machinery OEMs and users have come to expect for such research programs. If this trend continues, it will eventually be left to industry to self-teach and advance the knowledge required to produce the necessary rotating machinery. This paper will address the most interesting results from the author’s current research efforts in two different areas. First, a key area of research for the past 25 years has been the proper prediction of labyrinth seal excitation in centrifugal compressors. Second, for the past 15 years, the fluid film bearing thermally induced synchronous instability has been the most interesting and widespread source of a new excitation mechanism for modern machinery. A summary of results and future requirements for each of these areas will be discussed in the conclusions and recommendations.

Keywords

Labyrinth Seals Stability Thermal instability Rotordynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    Prohl, M.A.: A general method for calculating critical speeds of flexible rotors. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 67, A-142–A-148 (1959)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hori, Y.: A theory of oil whip. J. Appl. Mech., Trans. ASME 26(2), 189–198 (1959)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodmann, T.P.: A least-squares method for computing balance correction. J. Eng. Ind., Trans. ASME, Ser. B 86(3), 273–279 (1964)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lund, J.W.: Spring and damping coefficients for the tilting pad journal bearing. Trans. ASLE 7, 342–352 (1964)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lund, J.W.: Rotor-Bearing Dynamics Technology. Part V, AFAPL-TR-65-45, Aero Propulsion Lab. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, May (1965)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gunter, E.J.: Dynamic stability of rotor-bearing systems. NASA SP-113 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alford, J.S.: Protecting turbomachinery from self-excited rotor whirl. ASME, J.Eng. Power, Ser. A 87(4), 333–344 (1965)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruhl, R.L., Booker, J.F.: A finite element model for distributed parameter turborotor systems. ASME, J. Eng. Ind., Ser. B 128–132 (1972)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lund, J.W.: Stability and damped critical speeds of a flexible rotor in fluid-film bearings. ASME J. Eng. Ind., Ser. B 96(2), 509–517 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bansal, P.N., Kirk, R.G.: Stability and damped critical speeds of rotor-bearing systems. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 97(B4), 1325–1332 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirk, R.G.: Stability and damped critical speeds: how to calculate and interpret the results. CAGI Tech. Dig. 12(2), 375–383 (1980)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iwatsubo, T.: Evaluation of instability forces of labyrinth seals in turbines or compressors. In: Proceedings of Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High Performance Turbomachinery, NASA CP-2133, pp. 139–167. Texas A & M University — (1980)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirk, R.G.: A method for calculating labyrinth seal inlet swirl velocity. ASME J. Vib. Acous. 112(3), 380–383 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Memmott, E.A.: Stability of centrifugal compressors by applications of tilt pad seals, damper bearings, and shunt holes. In: IMechE, 5th International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, pp. 99–106. Bath, — 7–10 Sept. 1992Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunter, E.J., Chen, W.J.: DyRoBeS{ ©} - Dynamics of Rotor Bearing Systems User’s Manual. RODYN Vibration Analysis, Inc., Charlottesville, VA (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirk, R.G., Raju, K.V.S., Ramesh, K.: PC-based analysis of turbomachinery vibration. Shock and Vib. Dig. 31(6), 449–454 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rhode, D.L., Hensel, S.J., Guidry, M.J.: Labyrinth seal rotordynamic forces using a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes code. ASME J. Tribol. 114, 683–689 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rhode, D.L., Hensel, S.J., Guidry, M.J.: Three-dimensional computations of rotordynamic force distribution in a labyrinth seal. STLE Tribol. Trans. 36(3), 461–469 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ishii, E., Kato, C., Kikuchi, K., Ueyama, Y.: Prediction of rotordynamic forces in a labyrinth seal based on three-dimensional turbulent flow computation. JSME Int. J., Ser. C 40(4), 743–748 (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kwanka, K., Sobotzik, J., Nordmann, R.: Dynamic coefficients of labyrinth gas seals: a comparison of experimental results and numerical calculations. ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, 2000-GT-403 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moore, J.J.: Three-dimensional CFD rotordynamic analysis of gas labyrinth seals. J. Vib. and Acous., Trans. ASME 125(3), 427–433 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hirano, T., Guo, Z., Kirk, R.G.: Application of CFD analysis for rotating machinery, Part 2: labyrinth seal analysis. ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. and Power 127(4), 820–826 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ANSYS: TASCflow 2.12.1 Documentation (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kirk, R.G., Guo, Z.: Calibration of labyrinth seal bulk flow design analysis prediction to cfd simulation results. In: Proceedings of IMechE Eighth International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, Swansea 3-12 (2004). (The definitive version is available at www.wileyinterscience.com)
  25. 25.
    Kirk, R.G., Guo, Z.: Labyrinth seal forces for a high speed centrifugal impeller eye seal. In: Proceedings of 7th IFToMM-Conference on Rotor Dynamics, Vienna, Austria (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kirk, R.G., Guo, Z.: Influence of leak path friction on labyrinth seal inlet swirl. Tribol. Trans. 52(2), 139–145 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guo, Z., Kirk, R.G.: CFD evaluation of turbomachinery secondary flow leak path and labyrinth seal entry swirl. In: Proceedings of ISCORMA-3, Cleveland, Ohio (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirk, R.G., Guo, Z.: Leak path geometry influence on labyrinth seal inlet swirl velocity ratio. In: BHR 19th International Conference on Fluid Sealing, Poitiers, France (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    deJongh, F.M., Morton, P.G.: The synchronous instability of a compressor rotor due to bearing journal differential heating. ASME paper, 94-GT-35 (1994)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Keogh, P.S., Morton, P.G.: The dynamic nature of rotor thermal bending due to unsteady lubricant shearing within bearing. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Ser. A 445, 273–290 (1994)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Faulkner, H.B., Strong, W.F., Kirk, R.G.: Thermally induced synchronous instability of a radial inflow overhung turbine, part I. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC97/VIB-4063, Sacramento (1997)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Faulkner, H.B., Strong, W.F., Kirk, R.G.: Thermally induced synchronous instability of a radial inflow overhung turbine, part II. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC97/VIB-4174, Sacramento (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Balbahadur, A.C., Kirk, R.G.: Part I – Theoretical model for a synchronous thermal instability operating in overhung rotors. In: Proceedings of IFToMM, Sixth International Conference on Rotor Dynamics, Sydney, Australia (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Balbahadur, A.C., Kirk, R.G.: Part II – Case studies for a synchronous thermal instability operating in overhung rotors. In: Proceedings of IFToMM, Sixth International Conference on Rotor Dynamics, Sydney, Australia (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kirk, R.G., Guo, Z., Balbahadur, A.C.: Synchronous thermal instability prediction for overhung rotor. In: Proceedings of 32nd Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mehta, R.: Labyrinth Seal Preprocessor and Post-Processor Design and Parametric Study. Master’s Thesis, Virginia Tech, May (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentVirginia Tech.BlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations