Advertisement

The Principal Approaches Towards the Criminalisation of Aggression at the National Level

  • Sergey Sayapin
Chapter

Abstract

At least forty-two States have enacted legislation for the criminal repression of aggression and other crimes against peace. Useful as they are, these penal provisions are not uniform, though, and the diversity of States’ approaches probably testifies to the absence of customary international law on the subject to date. This chapter examines those provisions in the framework of four main “legislative models”, and extracts from them substantive and mental elements, which are essential for devising an inclusive corpus delicti of the crime of aggression. The “leadership requirement” is dealt with as a key element of the crime, and the propaganda for war is briefly considered as a separate crime against peace. The chapter concludes with an overview of key substantive and procedural matters of inter-State cooperation, if prosecutions for the crime of aggression are ever to take place within national legal systems.

Keywords

International Criminal Court National Court Criminal Code Rome Statute Criminal Liability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adilkariev HT (ed) (2003) Mejdunarodnoe pravo. [International Law], TashkentGoogle Scholar
  2. Barriga S (2011) The crime of aggression. In: Natarajan M (ed) International crime and justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 329–334Google Scholar
  3. Bekyashev KA (1999) Mejdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo [Public International Law]. Prospect, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. Boytsov AI (2004) Vydacha prestupnikov [The Rendition of Criminals]. Yuridicheskiy Centre, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassese A (2008) International criminal law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Cryer R (2005) Prosecuting international crimes: selectivity and the international criminal law regime. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Cryer R, Friman H, Robinson D and Wilmshurst E (2007) An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. David É (2009) Éléments de droit pénal international et européen. BruylantGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinstein Y (2001) War, aggression and self-defence, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Draft Code of crimes against the peace and security of mankind with commentaries (1996). In: Yearbook of the International Law Commission, volume II (Part Two), pp 17–56Google Scholar
  11. Dubber MD (2007) Criminalizing complicity: a comparative analysis. JICJ 5:977–1001Google Scholar
  12. Eagleton C (1938) The form and function of the declaration of war. AJIL 32:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eagleton C (1941) Acts of war. AJIL 35:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fenwick CG (1941) Intervention by way of propaganda. AJIL 35:626–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman AV (1947) War Crimes by enemy nationals administering justice in occupied territory. AJIL 41:579–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldsmith JL, Posner EA (2005) The limits of international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Haumer S, Marschner L (2010) Der internationale Strafgerichtshof und das Verbrechen der Aggression nach Kampala—Zu den neuesten Ergänzungen im IStGH-Statut und ihren Auswirkungen auf das deutsche Strafrecht. HuV-I 23:188–196Google Scholar
  18. Jessup PC (1954) Should international law recognize an intermediate status between peace and war? AJIL 48:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalamkaryan A, Migachev YI (2005) Mejdunarodnoe pravo [International Law]. Eksmo Education, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  20. Kearney MG (2007) The prohibition of the propaganda for war in international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Kemp G (2010) Individual criminal liability for the international crime of aggression. IntersentiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolosov YM, Kuzbetsov VI (eds) (1998) Mejdunarodnoe pravo [International Law]. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  23. Kovalev AA, Chernichenko SV (eds) (2008) Mejdunarodnoe pravo [International Law]. Moscow, Omega-LGoogle Scholar
  24. Kress C (2004) The german chief federal prosecutor’s decision not to investigate the alleged crime of preparing aggression against Iraq. JICJ 2:245–264Google Scholar
  25. Kudryavtsev VN, Luneev V, Naumov AV (eds) (2005a) Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast [Russia’s Criminal Law. General Part]. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  26. Kudryavtsev VN, Luneev V, Naumov AV (eds) (2005b) Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast. Russia’s Criminal Law. Specific Part, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava [A Treatise in Soviet Criminal Law] (1968), volume 1. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  28. Lauterpacht E (1968) The legal irrelevance of the “State of War”. In: Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, vol 62, pp 58–68Google Scholar
  29. Levin ID (2003) Suverenitet [Sovereignty]. Yuridicheskiy Centre Press, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  30. Lippman MR (2010) Contemporary Criminal Law: Concepts, Cases and Controversies, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, IncGoogle Scholar
  31. Lukashuk I (2008) Mejdunarodnoe pravo: Obshchaya chast [International Law: General Part], 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  32. Luneev VV (2005) Prestupnost XX veka: mirovye, regionalnye i rossiyskie tendentsii [Criminality in the 20th Century: Trends in the World, Region and Russia]. Wolters Kluwer, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  33. Lutz EL, Reiger C (2009) Introduction. In: Lutz EL, Reiger C (eds) Prosecuting Heads of State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  34. Marchenko MN (ed) (2003) Politologiya: kurs lektsiy [Political Science: Lecture Course]. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  35. Marochkin S (2006) International law in the courts of the Russian Federation: practice of application. Chinese JIL 5:329–344Google Scholar
  36. May L (2008) Aggression and crimes against peace. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. McDonald WF (2011) The longer arm of the law: the growth and limits of international law enforcement and criminal justice cooperation. In: Natarajan M (ed) International crime and justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 437–444Google Scholar
  38. McDougal MS (1955) Peace and war: factual continuum with multiple legal consequences. AJIL 49:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mégret F (2002) ‘War’? Legal semantics and the move to violence. EJIL 13:361–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meron T (1998) War crimes law comes of age. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Molan MT (2008) Cases and materials on criminal law, 4th edn. Routledge-CavendishGoogle Scholar
  42. Murphy SD (2006) Principles of international law. Thomson & WestGoogle Scholar
  43. Nesterenko SS (2009) Mehanizm zashity prav cheloveka v mejdunarodnom ekstraditsionnom prave [The Human Rights Protection Mechanism in the International Extradition Law]. Almanach Int Law 1:84–88Google Scholar
  44. Nesterenko SS (2010) Tendentsii razvitiya instituta okazaniya pravovoy pomoshchi po ugolovnym delam v XXI veke [The Development Trends of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters in the 21st Century]. Almanach Int Law 2:284–293Google Scholar
  45. Nesterenko SS (2011) Mijnarodno-pravoviy zahist prav lyudini pri zdiysnenni ekstraditsii [The International Protection of Human Rights in Extradition Matters]. Odessa, PhoenixGoogle Scholar
  46. O′Keefe R (2002) Customary international crimes in English courts. BYIL 73:293–335Google Scholar
  47. Okimoto K (2011) The distinction and relationship between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Orakhelashvili A (2007) Overlap and convergence: the interaction between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. JCSL 12:157–196Google Scholar
  49. Pictet JS (1952) Commentary of the first Geneva convention for the amelioration of the condition of the wounded and sick in armed forces in the field. ICRC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  50. Preuss L (1934) International responsibility for hostile propaganda against foreign states. AJIL 28:649–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Radzinowicz L (1966) Ideology and crime. LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Reisinger Coracini A (2009) Evaluating domestic legislation on the customary crime of aggression under the Rome Statute’s complementarity regime. In: Stahn C, Sluiter G (eds) The emerging practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Boston, pp 725–754Google Scholar
  53. Robertson G (2002) Crimes against humanity: struggle for global justice, 2nd edn. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Safferling C (2012) International criminal procedure. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  55. Sapronova MA (2007) Vysshie organy gosudarstvennoy vlasti arabskih respublik [The Arab Republics’ Supreme Bodies of State Authority]. Vostok–Zapad, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  56. Sayapin S (2010a) Razvitie opredeleniya prestupleniya agressii v mejdunarodnom i natsionalnom ugolovnom prave [The Development of the Definition of the Crime of Aggression in International and National Criminal Law]. Almanach Int Law 2:294–316Google Scholar
  57. Sayapin S (2010b) The compatibility of the Rome Statute’s draft definition of the crime of aggression with national criminal justice systems. IRPL 81:165–187Google Scholar
  58. Sayapin S (2004) The application of the fair trial guarantees to alleged terrorists in non-international armed conflicts. HuV-I 17:152–159Google Scholar
  59. Strebel H (1976) Einwirkungen nationalen Rechts auf das Völkerrecht. ZaöRV 36:168–189Google Scholar
  60. Tolochko ON (2009) Rejim voennoy okkupatsii v sovremennom mejdunarodnom gumanitarnom prave [The Regime of Military Occupation in the Contemporary International Humanitarian Law]. Almanach Int Law 1:180–188Google Scholar
  61. Van Dyke V (1940) The responsibility of States for international propaganda. AJIL 34:58–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Werle G (2009a) Principles of international criminal law, 2nd edn. T. M. C Asser Press, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Werle G (2009b) The crime of aggression between international and domestic criminal law. In: Manacorda S, Nieto A (eds), Criminal law between war and peace. Cuena, pp 405–421Google Scholar
  64. Whitton JB (1974) Aggressive Propaganda. In: Bassiouni MC, Nanda VP (eds) International Criminal Law, Springfield, pp 238–272Google Scholar
  65. Whitton JB (1951) Cold war propaganda. AJIL 45:151–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wildhaber L, Breitenmoser S (1988) The relationship between customary international law and municipal law in Western European countries. ZaöRV 48:163–207Google Scholar
  67. Wright Q (1948) The crime of war-mongering. AJIL 42:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zelinskaya NA (2006) Mejdunarodnye prestupleniya i mejdunarodnaya prestupnost [International Crimes and International Criminality]. Yuridichna literaturaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Institute and the author 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Prevention and Communication DepartmentICRC Regional Delegation in Central AsiaTashkentUzbekistan

Personalised recommendations