Advertisement

The Effects of the Lubanga Case on Understanding and Preventing Child Soldiering

Chapter
Part of the Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law book series (YIHL, volume 15)

Abstract

On March 14, 2012, a trial chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) convicted Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, a rebel leader from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, for child-soldier-related crimes. Some months later, Lubanga was sentenced to a prison term of fourteen years. On August 7, 2012, an ICC trial chamber issued its decision regarding the principles and procedures to be applied to reparations in the Lubanga case. This Article unpacks the relationships between the Lubanga proceedings and how the international community conceptualizes, and strives to prevent, child soldiering. This Article contends that the Lubanga proceedings reinforce, and incubate, a stylized portrayal of the child soldier as a faultless passive victim, psychologically devastated, and irreparably damaged. Although arguably facilitating criminal convictions of adult recruiters, these portrayals trigger a variety of troublesome externalities when it comes to the reintegration and rehabilitation of the former child soldiers and other youth (and adults) affected by conflict. This Article proceeds through several steps. First, it defines the term child soldier. Second, and drawing from the author’s prior work, it discusses how child soldiers are portrayed within the international legal imagination. Third, the on-the-ground realities of child soldiering are set out and contrasted with the prevailing imagery. The discussion, fourthly, then moves to a detailed analysis of the Lubanga trial and sentencing judgments, which are placed within broader discursive and socio-legal contexts. The Article concludes with discussion of the Lubanga reparations decision.

Keywords

Child Soldiers War Crimes International Criminal Law International Criminal Court Atrocity Post-Conflict Justice Victims Reparations 

References

  1. Annan J, Blattman C, and Horton R (2006) The State of Youth and Youth Protection in Northern Uganda: Findings from the Survey for War Affected Youth (report prepared for UNICEF Uganda).Google Scholar
  2. Annan J, Brier M, and Aryemo F (2009) From ‘Rebel’ to ‘Returnee’: Daily Life and Reintegration for Young Soldiers in Northern Uganda. Journal of Adolescent Research 24:639–667.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Ari E (2009) Facing Child Soldiers, Moral Issues, and “Real Soldiering”: Anthropological Perspectives on Professional Armed Forces. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 37(1):1–24.Google Scholar
  4. Blattman C and Annan J (2010) The Consequences of Child Soldiering. Review of Economics and Statistics 92(4):882–898.Google Scholar
  5. Boyden J and de Berry J (2004) Introduction. In: Jo Boyden and Joanna de Berry (eds) Children and Youth on the Frontline: Ethnography, Armed Conflict and Displacement. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  6. Brett R and Specht I (2004) Young Soldiers: Why They Choose to Fight. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.Google Scholar
  7. Child Soldiers International (2012) Louder Than Words: An Agenda for Action to End State Use of Child Soldiers. Child Soldiers International, London.Google Scholar
  8. Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers (2008) Child Soldiers Global Report 2008. Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, London.Google Scholar
  9. Cook J R (2012) Contemporary Practice of the United States: Liberian Removed from United States for Human Rights Abuses. American Journal of International Law 106:680–685.Google Scholar
  10. Dallaire R (2010) They Fight Like Soldiers, They Die Like Children. Random House Canada, Toronto.Google Scholar
  11. Denov M (2010) Child Soldiers: Sierra Leone’s Revolutionary United Front. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Drumbl M A (2012) Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Easterday J (15 May 2009) Expert Reports on the Psychological Impact of Child Soldiering. http://www.lubangatrial.org/2009/05/15/expert-reports-on-the-psychological-impact-of-child-soldiering/. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  14. Hart J (2006) Saving children: What role for anthropology? Anthropology Today 22(1):5–8.Google Scholar
  15. International Center for Transitional Justice (12 August 2012) Colombia: Hay 18.000 menores en grupos armados y bandas. http://ictj.org/es/news/colombia-hay-18000-menores-en-grupos-armados-y-bandas. Accessed 15 August 2012.
  16. International Labour Office (2003) Wounded Childhood: The Use of Children in Armed Conflict in Central Africa.Google Scholar
  17. Invisible Children (5 March 2012) KONY 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4MnpzG5Sqc. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  18. Jørgensen N (2012) Child Soldiers and the Parameters of International Criminal Law. Chinese Journal of International Law 11(4):657–688.Google Scholar
  19. Lloyd-George W, Inter Press Service (4 May 2012) Child Soldiers Used in Mali Conflict. http://allafrica.com/stories/201205041186.html. Accessed 8 May 2012.
  20. Lubanga Trial Transcript (2009) Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the Case of Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Trial English Language Transcript, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (7 April 2009).Google Scholar
  21. Lubanga Indirect Victims Decision (2009) Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the Case of Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on “Indirect Victims,” Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (8 April 2009).Google Scholar
  22. Lubanga Trial Judgment (2012) Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the Case of Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Trial Judgment, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (14 March 2012).Google Scholar
  23. Lubanga Sentencing Judgment (2012) Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the Case of Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Sentence, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (10 July 2012).Google Scholar
  24. Lubanga Reparations Decision (2012) Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the Case of Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Decision establishing the principles and procedures to be applied to reparations, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (7 August 2012).Google Scholar
  25. McKnight J (2010) Child Soldiers in Africa: A Global Approach to Human Rights Protection, Enforcement and Post-Conflict Reintegration, African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 18(2):113–142.Google Scholar
  26. Moreno-Ocampo L, Opening Statement in Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the Case of Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Trial English Language Transcript, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (26 January 2009) [Lubanga Trial Transcript].Google Scholar
  27. Otunnu O (2000) Keynote Address: The Convention and Children in Situations of Armed Conflict. In: Lisa Carlson et al. (eds) Children in Extreme Situations, LSE Development Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor Sentencing Judgment (2012) Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-01-T (18 May 2012).Google Scholar
  29. The Redress Trust (2006) Victims, Perpetrators or Heroes? Child Soldiers Before the International Criminal Court. http://www.redress.org/downloads/publications/childsoldiers.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  30. Rosen D (2007) Child Soldiers, International Humanitarian Law, and the Globalization of Childhood. American Anthropologist 109(2):296–306.Google Scholar
  31. Schmidt A (2007) Volunteer Child Soldiers as Reality: A Development Issue for Africa. New School Economic Review 2(1):49–76.Google Scholar
  32. Siegel M (16-17 June 2012) Report Details Sex Abuse of Minors in Australian Forces, International Herald Tribune.Google Scholar
  33. Singer P W (2006) Children at War. University of California Press, Berkley.Google Scholar
  34. Spiga V (2010) Indirect Victims’ Participation in the Lubanga Trial. Journal of International Criminal Justice 8:183–198.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations (20 November 1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child, U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/25 (entered into force 2 September 1990) [Convention on the Rights of the Child].Google Scholar
  36. United Nations (1998) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/romefra.htm. Accessed 22 May 2013).
  37. United Nations (25 May 2000) Optional Protocol to the CRC on the involvement of children in armed conflict, U.N. Doc. A/RES/54/263 (entered into force 12 February 2002) [Optional Protocol].Google Scholar
  38. United Nations (2006) Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards (IDDRS). http://pksoi.army.mil/doctrine_concepts/documents/UN%20Guidelines/IDDRS.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  39. UNICEF (April 1997) Cape Town Principles and Best Practices. http://www.unicef.org/emerg/files/Cape_Town_Principles(1).pdf. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  40. UNICEF (2002) Adult Wars, Child Soldiers: Voices of Children Involved in Armed Conflict in the East Asia and Pacific Region.Google Scholar
  41. UNICEF (February 2007) The Paris Principles: Principles and Guidelines on Children Associated with Armed Forces or Armed Groups. http://www.unicef.org/emerg/files/ParisPrinciples310107English.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  42. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre in cooperation with the International Center for Transitional Justice (August 2010) Children and Truth Commissions. http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/truth_commissions_eng.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  43. UNICEF (3 December 2012) Five new countries endorse the Paris commitments to end the use of children in conflict. http://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/press-releases/five-new-countries-endorse-the-paris-commitments-to-end-the-use-of-children-in-conflict/. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  44. Utas M (2003) Sweet Battlefields: Youth and the Liberian Civil War. Lindblom & Co., Stockholm.Google Scholar
  45. Vivo, who is who in vivo. http://www.vivo.org/about_vivo/who_is_who_in_vivo/index_eng.html. Accessed 25 January 2013.
  46. Wessells M (2004) Psychosocial Issues in Reintegrating Child Soldiers. Cornell International Law Journal 37:513–525.Google Scholar
  47. Wessells M (2006) Child Soldiers: From Violence to Protection. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Women’s Initiatives for Gender Justice (August 2012) Legal Eye on the ICC Special Issue # 3. http://www.iccwomen.org/news/docs/WI-LegalEye8-12-FULL/LegalEye8-12.html. Accessed 14 August 2012.
  49. World Health Organization (2009) Bulletin of the World Health Organization: Healing Child Soldiers. http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/5/09-020509/en/. Accessed April 18, 2013.

Further Reading

  1. Drumbl M A (2012) Child Soldiers and Clicktivism: Justice, Myths, and Prevention, Journal of Human Rights Practice 4(3):481–485.Google Scholar
  2. Drumbl M A (3 March 2012) Lubanga Decision Roundtable: Lubanga Legacies? http://opiniojuris.org/2012/03/19/lubanga-decision-roundtable-legacies/. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  3. International Center for Transitional Justice (2012) Engaging Children and Youth in Transitional Justice Processes: Guidance for Outreach Programs. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Report-Childrens-Outreach-Guidelines-Nov2012.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2013.
  4. International Criminal Court (18 December 2012) ICC Trial Chamber II acquits Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui. http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/press%20and%20media/press%20releases/news%20and%20highlights/Pages/pr865.aspx. Accessed 3 March 2013.
  5. Schabas W (13 July 2012) Lubanga Sentenced to Fourteen Years. http://humanrightsdoctorate.blogspot.nl/2012/07/lubange-sentence-to-fourteen-years.html. Accessed 16 July 2012.

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transnational Law InstituteWashington and Lee UniversityLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations