Advertisement

Child Soldiers at the International Criminal Court

  • Julie McBrideEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter begins with a brief examination of the relationship between the International Criminal Court and the crime of child soldier recruitment. What were the reasons for the first trial—Prosecutor v. Thomas Dyilo Lubanga—to focus narrowly on just one crime, instead of charges such as genocide or more established war crimes? This chapter will demonstrate that the decision to focus on child recruitment was motivated by the erroneous belief by the Office of the Prosecutor that it would be a simple and straightforward trial. The OTP had evidence that it believed would result in a ‘slam-dunk’, but its use of intermediaries to procure witnesses and its stance on discovery resulted in a much-delayed and obstacle-filled three-year trial. The progress of the Lubanga trial and the resulting Trial Chamber judgment are examined in details, and the issue of prosecuting child soldiers at the ICC is also analysed.

Keywords

Armed Conflict International Criminal Court International Criminal Rome Statute Trial Chamber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aksar Y (2002) The case of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo: the implementation of a fair and public trial at the investigation stage of International Criminal Court proceedings. Ankara Bar Rev 2:81Google Scholar
  2. Badar M (2008) The mental element in the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary from a comparative criminal law perspective. Crim Law Forum 19:474Google Scholar
  3. Baylis EA (2009) Outsourcing investigations. UCLA J Int Law Foreign Aff 14:121Google Scholar
  4. Bekou O (2008) Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo—decision on the confirmation of charges. Hum Rights Law Rev 8:343Google Scholar
  5. Bowman R (2007) Lubanga, the DRC and the African court: lessons learned from the first International Criminal Court case. Afr Hum Rights Law J 7(2):412Google Scholar
  6. Burke-White WW (2005) Complementarity in practice: the International Criminal Court as part of a system of multi-level global governance in the democratic republic of Congo. Leiden J Int Law 18:557Google Scholar
  7. Cassese A (1999) The statute of the international criminal court: some preliminary reflections. Eur J Int Law 10:153Google Scholar
  8. Clark RS (2008) Elements of crimes in early confirmation decisions of Pre-Trial Chambers of the International Criminal Court. N Z Yearb Int Law 6:209Google Scholar
  9. Concannon B (2000) Beyond complementarity: the International Criminal Court and national prosecutions: a view from Haiti. Columbia Hum Rights Law Rev 32:201Google Scholar
  10. Cryer R et al (2010) An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Fletcher GP (2000 reprint) Rethinking criminal law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Flint J, De Waal A (2009) Case closed: a prosecutor without borders. World Aff J 171(4):23–38Google Scholar
  13. Freeland S (2008) Mere children or weapons of war—child soldiers and international law. Univ La Verne Law Rev 129:9Google Scholar
  14. Gallagher K (2011) Towards a gender-inclusive definition of child soldiers: the prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga. Eyes ICC 7:114Google Scholar
  15. Graff J (2004) Corporate war criminals and the International Criminal Court: blood and profits in the democratic republic of Congo. Hum Rights Brief 11:23Google Scholar
  16. Happold M (2007) Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga, decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court, 29 January 2007. Int Comp Law Q 56:713Google Scholar
  17. Happold M (2008) Child recruitment as a crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. In: Doria J et al (eds) The legal regime of the International Criminal Court: essays in memory of Igor Blischenko. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs D (2012) A shifting scale of power: who is in charge of the charges at the International Criminal Court? In: Schabas WA et al (eds) Ashgate research companion to international criminal law: critical perspectives. Ashgate Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kisangani EF, Scott BF (2010) Historical dictionary of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Scarecrow Press, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  20. Masire K (2001) The Lusaka agreement: prospects for peace in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Afr Secur Rev 10(1):88–91Google Scholar
  21. Guibert N, Blumenstock T (2007) The first judgment of the special court for Sierra Leone: a missed opportunity? LPICT 6:367–391Google Scholar
  22. Nzongola-Ntalaja G (2002) The Congo from Leopold to Kabila: a people’s history. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Ochoa JC (2008) The ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber I confirmation of charges decision in the case of prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo: between application and development of international criminal law. Eur J Crime, Crim Law Crim Justice 16:56Google Scholar
  24. Ohlin JD (2011) Joint intentions to commit international crimes 11. Chic J Int Law 11:693Google Scholar
  25. Osiel M (2005) The banality of good: aligning incentives against mass atrocity. Colum Law Rev 105:1751Google Scholar
  26. Pilloud C et al (1987) Commentary on the additional protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  27. Rotberg RI (2003) State failure and state weakness in a time of terror. Brookings Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Sacouto S, Cleary K (2007) The gravity threshold of the International Criminal Court. Am Univ Int Law Rev 23:807Google Scholar
  29. Schabas W (2008) Prosecutorial discretion v judicial activism at the International Criminal Court. J Int Crim Justice 6:731Google Scholar
  30. Schabas WA (2007) Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Schiff BN (2008) Building the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Shawki N, Cox M (2009) Negotiating sovereignty and human rights: actors and issues in contemporary human rights politics. Ashgate Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Singer PW (2006) Children at war. Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Stearns J (2011) Dancing in the glory of monsters: the collapse of the Congo and the great war of Africa. Public Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Stromseth JE (2007) Pursuing accountability for atrocities after conflict: what impact on building the rule of law? Georget J Int Law 38:257Google Scholar
  36. Weigend T (2008) Intent, mistake of law, and co-perpetration in the Lubanga decision on confirmation of charges. J Int Crim Justice 6:471Google Scholar
  37. Werle G (2005) Principles of international criminal law, 2nd edn. T.M.C Asser Press, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  38. Whiting A (2009) Lead evidence and discovery before the International Criminal Court: the Lubanga case. UCLA J Int Law Foreign Aff 14:207Google Scholar
  39. Willmott D (2004) Removing the distinction between international and non-international armed conflict in the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court. Melb J Int Law 8:196Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T. M. C. Asser press, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations