The Protection of Victims in War Crimes Trials

Chapter

Abstract

International criminal courts and tribunals rely mainly on victim testimony to establish the occurrence of war crimes. These institutions face important challenges in protecting victims. Many victims are reluctant to provide testimony in fear of retaliation. For these persons, testifying requires an act of courage, especially because persons allegedly involved in the crimes still walk the streets of their villages and towns. International courts have developed protection mechanisms to address the security concerns of victims. In doing so, they have had to reconcile the conflicting rights of victims and defendants. The experience of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia captures some of the challenges faced by international courts in victim protection. It also provides valuable lessons to future courts.

Keywords

Victims Protective measures Contempt Witness intimidation International criminal justice War crimes trials 

References

  1. Cassese A (2008) International Criminal Law, 2nd edn. OUP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Chinkin C (1997) Due process and witness anonymity. AJIL 91:75–79Google Scholar
  3. Haider H, Welch T (2008) The prosecution of witnesses in Bosnian war crimes trials: a fair balance between the interests of victims and the rights of the accused? DLJ 20:55–86Google Scholar
  4. Jouet M (2007) Reconciling the conflicting rights of victims and defendants at the international criminal court. Saint Louis Univ Public Law Rev 26:249–308Google Scholar
  5. Kippenberg J (2009) Protecting child victims in sexual violence trials in the DR Congo: suggestions for the way forward. Human Rights Watch, New York. www.hrw.org
  6. Leigh M (1996) The Yugoslav Tribunal: use of unnamed witnesses against the accused. AJIL 90:235–237Google Scholar
  7. Mahony C (2010) International Criminal Court’s victims and witnesses unit: a mandate to protect all? In: Mahony C (ed) Justice sector afterthought: witness protection in Africa. Institute for Security Studies, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  8. May R (2003) The collection and admissibility of evidence and the rights of the accused. In: Lattimer M, Sands P (eds) Justice for crimes against humanity. Hart Publishing, Oxford, p 161Google Scholar
  9. Paterson N (2003) Silencing victims in international courts: neglecting a solemn obligation. GJIA 4:95Google Scholar
  10. Pena M (2008) Time for the ICC to take on protection of intermediaries and lawyers. VRWG Access Bulletin, Issue 13Google Scholar
  11. Pozen J (2006) Justice obscured: the non-disclosure of witnesses’ identities in ICTR trials. JILP 38:281–322Google Scholar
  12. Sluiter G (2005) The ICTR and the protection of witnesses, 3 JICJ, pp. 962–976Google Scholar
  13. Stover E (2005) The witnesses: war crimes and the promises of justice in The Hague. University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  14. UNDP (2010) Needs assessment in the field of support to witnesses/victims in Bih. A situation and needs assessment of the cantonal / district prosecutors’ offices and courts in the field of witness/victim support and protection in war crimes cases in Bih. http://www.undp.ba/upload/publications/Needs%20Assessment%20in%20the%20Field%20of%20Support%20to%20Witness-Victims%20in%20BiH.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2013
  15. Wald P (2002) Dealing with witnesses in war crimes trials: lessons from the Yugoslav Tribunal. YHRDLJ 5:217Google Scholar

Further Literature

  1. Affolder NA (1997–1998) Tadić, the anonymous witness and the sources of international procedural law. Mich J of Int L 19:445–496Google Scholar
  2. Cassese A, Gaeta P and Jones JRWD (eds) (2002) The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Fyfe NR (2001) Protecting intimidated witnesses. Ashgate Publishing Company, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Haslam E (2004) Silencing hearings? Victim-witnesses at war crimes trials. Eur J Int L 15:151–177Google Scholar
  5. Kuhner TK (2004) The status of victims in the enforcement of international criminal law. Oreg Rev Int L 6:95–152Google Scholar
  6. Leigh M (1997) Witness anonymity is inconsistent with due process. Am J of Int L 91:80Google Scholar
  7. Nijboer JF (2000) Children and young persons in the criminal justice system: The Council of Europe recommendation on witness protection and rights of the defence. Crim L Forum 10:443Google Scholar
  8. Safferling CJM (2002) International criminal procedure and its participants: an examination of the interaction of judges, prosecutor and defence at the Yugoslav Tribunal. Yrb Int Hum L 5:219–252Google Scholar
  9. Trechsel S (2005) Human rights in criminal proceedings. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Walleyn L (2002) Victimes et témoins de crimes internationaux: du droit à un protection au droit à la parole. Int Rev of the Red Cr 84(845):51–78Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of the ProsecutionInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former YugoslaviaThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations