The Status of Victims Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analysis the three traditional foci of victim status under international criminal law: participation, protection, and reparation. Whereas, both the ICTY and ICTR statutes largely ignored victim issues, the Rome Statute of the ICC specifically addresses the interests of victims in cases against their persecutors. However, as a new body with little experience to draw upon, the process of bringing victims into the proceedings in a meaningful way is still under development. As a threshold matter, a person must meet the definition of “victim” under Rule 85 RPE ICC before they can qualify to participate. The author explores the parameters of “victimhood” by placing the definition in a variety of contexts—especially with respect to other rights and obligations victims may have under the Rome Statute. Victim safety is also addressed as well as the new Victim and Witness Unit within the ICC bureaucracy. With respect to reparations for victims, the author considers the options of restitution, compensation, and rehabilitation. To date the Trust Fund for Victims has not resolved key operational questions on reparations concerning the seizure and management of defendant assets, investment, return upon acquittal, and disbursement to qualified victims upon conviction.

Keywords

Victim status Participation Protection Reparation Attaining victim status Representation of victims Personal interests Preclusion Victim and Witness Unit Trust Fund for Victims 

References

  1. Dannenbaum T (2010) The International Criminal Court, Article 79, and transitional justice: the case for an independent Trust Fund for Victims. WILJ 28:234–298Google Scholar
  2. Dwertmann E (2010) The reparation system of the International Criminal Court: its implementation, possibilities and limitations. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  3. Greco G (2007) Victims’ Rights Overview under the ICC Legal Framework: a jurisprudential analysis. ICLR 7:531–547Google Scholar
  4. International Criminal Court (2010) Helping victims make their voices heard—The Office of Public Counsel for Victims. http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/01A26724-F32B-4BE4-8B02-A65D6151E4AD/282846/LRBookletEng.pdf.Accessed11April2013.
  5. Kaoutzanis C (2010) Two birds with one stone: how the use of the class action device for victim participation in the International Criminal Court can improve both the fight against impunity and victim participation. UC Davis JILP 17:111–150Google Scholar
  6. Keller L (2007) Proceedings of the scholarly conference taking reparations seriously: seeking justice at the International Criminal Court: victims’ reparations. TJLR 29:189–218Google Scholar
  7. Megret F (2010) Article of shrines, memorials and museums: using the International Criminal Court’s victim reparation and assistance regime to promote transitional justice. BHRLR 16:1–56Google Scholar
  8. Pena M (2010) Victim participation in the International Criminal Court: Victim participation at the International Criminal Court: achievements made and challenges lying ahead. ILSAJICL 16:497–516Google Scholar
  9. SaCouto S, Cleary K (2008) The war crimes symposium: Victims’ participation in the investigations of the International Criminal Court. TCLP 17:73–106Google Scholar
  10. Trumbull IV C (2008) The victims of victim participation in International Criminal Proceedings. MJIL 29:777–826Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Creighton University School of LawOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations