Skip to main content

Victims’ Rights and Peace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1711 Accesses

Abstract

The contribution provides an overview of the ICC victims’ participation and reparations system. It analyses the origins of the system—the French system of victims’ participation in criminal proceedings—and examines its potential to alleviate and to acknowledge the sufferings of the victims but also the many challenges or even risks for errors it presents. The article refers in particular to the problem of establishing standards of evidence sufficient to ascertain that a person has suffered harm as a result of the commission of a crime under the jurisdiction of the Court and the related issue of establishing a person’s identity. It also refers to the Court’s obligation to guarantee the victims a genuine and authentic participation in the proceedings through a legal representative. The article highlights the significant contribution to promote reconciliation and peace in regions affected by mass crimes the ICC system of victims’ participation and reparations can make. In the second part of this article, the author turns the attention to several key questions concerning the relationship between victims’ rights and peace: what are the factors and risks leading time and again to mass victimisation of human beings? Is it not a fundamental and urgent necessity for all concerned to exhaust all ways and means to prevent developments that lead to mass victimisation? Given this question, the author finds that the most serious dangers and grave risks to make thousands of men, women and children victims of international crimes are brought about by war-making, illegal or questionable uses of armed force or outright crimes against peace as defined in the Nuremberg principles. The conclusion is that the best chance to prevent mass victimisation is determination and resolve in the prevention of questionable uses of armed force, including possible future crimes against peace, crimes of aggression as defined in Articles 8 bis and 15 bis and 15 ter of the Rome Statute, as, according to experience, they inevitably lead to widespread human suffering and victims.

The author is a judge at the International Criminal Court. From 1996 to 2003, he has been the head of the German delegation for the negotiations for the ICC, before being elected in February 2003 as the first German judge to the ICC for a period of three years. He was re-elected in 2006 for another period of nine years. From March 2009 to March 2012, Judge Kaul has served for three years as the Second Vice-President of the ICC. He is assigned to the Pre-Trial Division.

The form of an oral presentation as actually delivered has been largely maintained also for reasons of authenticity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a comprehensive monography on the rights of victims before the International Criminal Court see Bock 2010.

  2. 2.

    See Eckelmans, Chap. 12 in this volume, pp. 189–222.

  3. 3.

    Stahn et al. 2006, p. 220.

  4. 4.

    See for example ICC Prosecutor v Bemba, PTC, ICC-01/05-01/08-320, 12 December 2008, Fourth Decision on Victims’ Participation; ICC Prosecutor v Bemba, TC, ICC-01/05-01/08-1862, 25 October 2011, Decision on 270 applications by victims to participate in the proceedings; ICC Situation in Darfur, PTC, ICC-02/05-110, 3 December 2007, Decision on the Requests of the OPCD on the Production of Relevant Supporting Documentation Pursuant to Regulation 86(2)(e) of the Regulations of the Court and on the Disclosure of Exculpatory Materials by the Prosecutor; ICC Situation in Uganda, PTC, ICC-02/04-191, 9 March 2012, Decision on Victim’s Participation in Proceedings Related to the Situation in Uganda. For an overview see Chung 2008, pp. 459–545.

  5. 5.

    With a critical remark: Van den Wyngaert 2012.

  6. 6.

    ICC Prosecutor v Bemba, PTC, ICC-01/05-01/08-322, 16 December 2008, Fifth Decision on Victims’ Issues Concerning Common Legal Representation of Victims.

  7. 7.

    ICC Prosecutor v Katanga and Chui, TC, ICC-01/04-01/07-1328, 22 July 2009, Order on the organisation of common legal representation of victims; ICC Prosecutor v Bemba, TC, ICC-01/05-01/08-1005, 20 November 2010, Decision on common legal representation of victims for the purpose of trial.

  8. 8.

    ICC Prosecutor v Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11; ICC Prosecutor v Muthaura and Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11.

  9. 9.

    ICC Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, PTC, ICC-01/04-101-tENG, 17 January 2006, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings of VPRS 1, VPRS 2, VPRS 3, VPRS 4, VPRS 5 and VPRS 6, para 51; ICC Prosecutor v Katanga and Chui, PTC, ICC-01/04-01/07-474, 13 May 2008, Decision on the Set of Procedural Rights Attached to Procedural Status of Victim at the Pre-Trial Stage of the Case, para 155; ICC Prosecutor v Bemba, PTC, ICC-01/05-01/08-320, 12 December 2008, Fourth Decision on Victims’ Participation, para 90. On the role of the legal representatives see also for example McGonigle Leyh 2011, p. 505 et subs.

  10. 10.

    ICC Prosecutor v Lubanga, TC, ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, 14 March 2012, Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute.

  11. 11.

    Van den Wyngaert 2012; McKay 2008, p. 4.

  12. 12.

    Boyle 2006, p. 307.

  13. 13.

    Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1950/Add.1 (1950). United Nations International Law Commission: Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgement of the Tribunal, 5 June–29 July 1950.

References

  • Bock S (2010) Das Opfer vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle D (2006) The rights of victims. JICJ 4:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CH (2008) Victims’ participation at the International Criminal Court: are concessions of the court clouding the promise? NJIHR 6:459–545

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigle Leyh B (2011) Victim participation and the ICC. In: Letschert R, Haveman R, de Brouwer A, Pemberton A (eds) Victimological approaches to international crimes: Africa. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp. 493–524

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay F (2008) Victim participation in proceedings before the International Criminal Court. Hum Rights Brief 15(3):2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahn C, Olásolo H, Gibson K (2006) Participation of victims in pre-trial proceedings of the ICC. JICJ 4:219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Wyngaert C (2012) Victims before International Criminal Courts: Some views and concerns of an ICC trial judge. Case West Reserv Univ J Int Law 44:475–496

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Peter Kaul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaul, HP. (2013). Victims’ Rights and Peace. In: Bonacker, T., Safferling, C. (eds) Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-912-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships