Advertisement

The Influence of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) on the EU Legal Order

  • Françoise D. Schild
Chapter

Abstract

The EU legal order reveals the influence of the FAO in five policy fields: fisheries, food law, animal health, international food security and forestry. In this chapter, two policy fields which may serve to exemplify FAO’s influence on the EU legal order, namely food security and food law, are discussed against the background of FAO’s institutional set-up and the history of FAO-EU interaction. The developments in the fields of food security and food law bring to light a shift from a partnership between equals to a more hierarchical relationship in which the EU acts as one of the FAO’s members. This contribution examines the Codex Alimentarius example (international administrative activity) and the CFS example (policy discussions). EU participation in these fora is examined in order to assess whether more intense participation leads to stronger effects in the EU legal order. The contribution also examines whether the Lisbon Treaty has had an effect on EU participation in the FAO. The CFS example is found to show some effects of the FAO’s work on EU policy thinking whereas EU participation was mostly limited to representation by a Member State. The Codex example shows considerable effects in the EU legal order. The extent of these effects, however, is determined by the EU legislator and judiciary. The participation of EU officials in the Codex Alimentarius Commission has led to some degree of informal influence.

Keywords

Member State Lisbon Treaty Codex Alimentarius Commission Codex Standard World Food Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Afonso Pereira R (2010) Why would international administrative activity be any less legitimate—a study of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. In: Von Bogdandy A et al (eds) The exercise of public authority by international institutions. Springer, Berlin, pp 541–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins R, White ND (2011) Introduction and overview. In: Collins R, White ND (eds) International organizations and the idea of autonomy. Institutional independence in the international legal order. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  3. Cremona M (2011) External relations and external competence of the European Union: the emergence of an integrated policy. In: Craig P, De Búrca G (eds) The evolution of EU law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 217–168Google Scholar
  4. D’Aspremont J (2011) The multifaceted concept of the autonomy of international organisations and international legal discourse. In: Collins R, White ND (eds) International organizations and the idea of autonomy. Institutional independence in the international legal order, Routledge, Abingdon, pp 63–86Google Scholar
  5. De Pinho AT (1993) L’admission de la communauté économique européenne comme membre de l’ Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’Alimentation et l’Agriculture (FAO).” Revue du marché commun et de l’Union Européenne (370), p 663Google Scholar
  6. Eckes C (2010) International law as law of the EU: the role of the Court of Justice, CLEER working papers 2010/6Google Scholar
  7. Emerson M et al (2011) Upgrading the EU’s role as global actor. Institutions, law and the restructuring of European diplomacy, Centre for European Policy Studies, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (2011) A constitution. In: Basic texts of the food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations, Volumes I and II, 2011 edition, working Version, December 2011: http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/022/K8024E.pdf, accessed 5 April 2012
  9. Heliskoski J (2000) Internal struggle for international presence: the exercise of voting rights within the FAO. In: Dashwood A (ed) The general law of EC external relations. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Lavranos N (2004) Legal interaction between decisions of international organizations and European law. Europa Law Publishing, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  11. Maersk Pedersen J (2006) FAO-EU cooperation: an ever stronger partnership. In: Wouters J et al (eds) The United Nations and the European Union: an ever stronger partnership. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martenczuk B (2001) Decisions of bodies established by international agreements and the community legal order. In: Kronenberger V (ed) The European Union and the international legal order: discord or harmony? TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 141–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masson-Matthee MD (2007) The Codex Alimentarius Commission and its standards. TMC Asser Press, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Poli S (2004) The European Community and the adoption of international food standards within the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Eur Law J 10:613–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Secretariat of the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme (2006) Understanding the Codex Alimentarius: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/y7867e/y7867e00.pdf, accessed 5 April 2012
  16. Van Elsuwege P (2011) Case note. Case C-246/07, Commission v. Sweden (PFOS) nyr. Am J Int Law 105:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Schaik L (2010) Is the sum more than its parts? A comparative case study on the relationship between EU unity and its effectiveness in multilateral negotiations, PhD thesis Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Law DivisionMinistry of Foreign AffairsThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations