Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations—An Introduction

Chapter

Abstract

The European Union’s legal order is traditionally perceived as largely autonomous, not only internally (vis-à-vis the Member States), but also externally (in relation to third states and other international organisations). The source of this perception is to be found in the early case law of the Court of Justice. Stressing its autonomy was believed to be necessary to establish an independent identity and could perhaps be seen as a disguised claim to sovereignty, something international organisations—unlike states—have to fight for. These days, ‘autonomy’ has been given a strong constitutional meaning. Yet, the EU displays a certain ‘openness’ and does not seem to have a problem with allowing binding international norms to become part of its legal order, either through accepting international obligations or by referring to international agreements in its own Treaties. With the gradual development of its external relations and the increase of external competences, the EU even revealed its ‘dependence’ on international law and international normative processes, as it had no choice but to accept that in order to be able to play along on the global stage, it had to follow the rules of the game. Increasingly, normative processes take place within international organisations and other norm-generating bodies. The strong and explicit link between the EU and a large number of other international organisations raises questions concerning the impact of decisions taken by other international organisations and of international agreements concluded with those organisations (either by the EU itself or by its Member States) on the autonomy of the EU and its Member States. In this introductory chapter, the editors give a flavour of the questions which will be addressed in the book.

Keywords

International Monetary Fund International Agreement Legal Order World Intellectual Property Organisation Lisbon Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alvarez J (2005) International organizations as law-makers. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Barents R (2004) The autonomy of community law. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  3. Blockmans S, Wessel RA (eds) (2012) Principles and practice of EU external representation. CLEER Working Papers 2012/5Google Scholar
  4. Cannizzaro E, Palchetti P, Wessel RA (eds) (2011) International law as law of the European Union. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston/LeidenGoogle Scholar
  5. Costa O, Jørgensen KE (2012) The influence of international institutions on the EU: a framework for analysis. In: Costa O and Jørgensen K E (eds), The influence of international institutions on the EU: when multilateralism hits Brussels. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke Google Scholar
  6. De Witte B (1999) Direct effect, supremacy, and the nature of the legal order. In: Craig P, De Búrca G (eds) The evolution of EU law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 177–183Google Scholar
  7. Eckes C (2011) International law as law of the EU: the role of the Court of Justice. In: Cannizzaro E, Palchetti P, Wessel RA (eds), International law as law of the European Union. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston/LeidenGoogle Scholar
  8. Eckes C (2012) Protecting supremacy from external influences: a precondition for a European constitutional order. Eur Law J 18(2):230–250Google Scholar
  9. Føllesdal A, Wessel RA, Wouters J (eds) (2008) Multilevel regulation and the EU: the interplay between global European and national normative processes. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffmeister F (2008) The contribution of EU practice under international law. In: Cremona M (ed) Developments in EU external relations law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 37–127Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs FG (2008) Direct effect and interpretation of international agreements in the recent case law of the European court of justice. In: Dashwood A, Maresceau M (eds) Law and practice of EU external relations: salient features of a changing landscape. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–33Google Scholar
  12. Jørgensen KE, Wessel RA (2011) The position of the European Union in (other) international organizations: confronting legal and political approaches. In: Koutrakos (ed), European foreign policy: legal and political perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, pp 261–286Google Scholar
  13. Jørgensen KE (2008) The European Union and international organizations. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuijper PJ (2008) Customary international law, decisions of international organisations and other techniques for ensuring respect for international legal rules in European community law. In: Wouters J, Nollkaemper A, De Wet E (eds) The Europeanisation of international law: the status of international law in the EU and its member states. T.M.C Asser Press, The Hague, pp 87–106Google Scholar
  15. Lavranos N (2010) Protecting European law from international law. Eur Foreign Aff Rev 15:265–282Google Scholar
  16. Pauwelyn P, Wessel RA, Wouters J (eds) (2012) Informal international lawmaking. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Rossem JW (2011) The EU at crossroads: a constitutional inquiry into the way international law is received within the EU legal order. In: Cannizzaro E, Palchetti P, Wessel RA (eds), International law as law of the European Union. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston/LeidenGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Vooren B, Blockmans S, Wouters J (eds) (2013, forthcoming), The EU’s role in global governance: the legal dimension. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  19. Wouters J, Van Eeckhoute D (2004) Giving effect to customary international law through European community law. In: Prinssen J, Schrauwen A (eds) Direct effect. European Law Publishing, Groningen, pp 183–234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for European Policy StudiesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations