The European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A Process of Mutual Enrichment

Chapter

Abstract

This article looks at the cross-fertilisation that exists between the case law of the European Court of Human Rights interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights and that of the European Court of Justice when it examines cases with a human rights element under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The Court in Strasbourg has looked to the provisions of the Charter to inform its interpretation of the Convention in cases concerning same-sex marriage, the rights of members of the civil service to sue their employers, the application of Article 6 to proceedings concerning interim measures and the application of the “more lenient penalty” rule in criminal law. At the same time the European Court of Justice has sought to apply the Charter with reference to the case law of the Strasbourg Court in the application of the principle of homogeneity set out in Article 52 § 3 of the Charter. The current practice is mutually enriching for both Courts, as well as for the level of human rights protection throughout Europe, and can be seen as a form of judicial dialogue that will undoubtedly be enhanced when accession of the European Union to the Convention comes about.

References

  1. Benoît-Rohmer F (2011) L’Union européenne et les droits fondamentaux depuis l’entrée en vigueur du Traité de Lisbonne. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 1/2011:145–172 Google Scholar
  2. Cassia P, von Coester S (2012) L’application de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne par le juge national. La Semaine Juridique 10/2012:503–509Google Scholar
  3. Lock T (2009) The ECJ and the ECtHR: The Future Relationship between the Two European Courts. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 8/2009:375–398Google Scholar
  4. Rosas A, Kaila H (2011) L’application de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne par la Cour de justice: un premier bilan. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 1/2011:9Google Scholar
  5. Skouris V (2009) Speech given at the seminar organised by the European Court of Human Rights to mark its fiftieth anniversary. Dialogue between judges, Council of EuropeGoogle Scholar
  6. Ziemele I (2011) Other rules of international law and the European Court of Human Rights: a question of a simple collateral benefit? In: The European convention on human rights, a living instrument (liber amoricum Christos Rozakis). Bruylant, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Instituut 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Court of Human RightsStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations