Advertisement

Evidence Before the International Court of Justice: Issues of Fact and Questions of Law in the Determination of International Custom

  • Luigi Fumagalli
Chapter

Abstract

Evidence directly serves the purposes of international adjudication, which is the settlement of a dispute. However, the rules on evidence play a more fundamental role before an international court, since an international court, by way of its activity, might be seen to be contributing actively to the elaboration process of the applicable rules having a customary nature. In that respect, the examination of the rules which are applicable before the ICJ shows that the Court has a great deal of power to direct the parties’ activities in the presentation of evidence and is allowed an active role in the taking of evidence. This power can be used, according to the iura novit curia principle, chiefly when the determination of the factual element comprised in a customary rule is at issue. This line is to be followed especially with respect to the peremptory norms of international law.

Keywords

International Tribunal Advisory Opinion International Court International Custom Separate Opinion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barile G (1953) La rilevazione e l’integrazione del diritto internazionale non scritto e la libertà di apprezzamento del giudice. Comunicazioni e studi 5:141–229Google Scholar
  2. Benzing M (2010) Das Beweisrecht vor Internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten in Zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benvenuti P (1984) L’accertamento del diritto mediante i pareri consultivi della Corte internazionale di giustizia. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  4. Brower CN (1994) Evidence before international tribunals: the need for some standard rules. Int Lawyer 28:47–58Google Scholar
  5. Brown (2007) A common Law of International adjudication. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cannizzaro E (2011) Corso di diritto internazionale. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  7. Cansacchi G (1939) Le presunzioni nel diritto internazionale. Jovene, NapoliGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassese A (2006) Diritto internazionale. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandrasekhara Rao P, Gautier P (eds) (2006) The rules of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: a commentary. Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubisson M (1964) La Cour Internationale de Justice. Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrari Bravo L (1958) La prova nel processo internazionale. Jovene, NapoliGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzmaurice G (1986) The law and practice of the International Court of Justice. Grotius, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Grossen J-M (1954) Les présomptions en droit international public. Delachaux & Niestlé, NeuchâtelGoogle Scholar
  14. Guyomar G (1983) Commentaire du Règlement de la Cour Internationale de Justice. Pedone, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Kazazi M (1996) Burden of proof and related issues. A study on evidence before international tribunals. Kluwer, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  16. Lalive JF (1950) Quelques remarques sur la preuve devant la Cour Permanente et la Cour Internationale de Justice. Annuaire Suisse de Droit International 7:77–103Google Scholar
  17. Luzzatto R (1975) La competenza consultiva della corte internazionale di giustizia nella soluzione delle controversie internazionali. Comunicazioni e Studi 14:479–499Google Scholar
  18. Morelli G (1940) Fatto e diritto nel processo internazionale. In: Bottai G (ed) Scritti giuridici in onore di Santi Romano 3. Cedam, Padova, pp 109–119Google Scholar
  19. Niyungeko G (2005) La preuve devant les juridictions internationales. Bruylant, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  20. Pellet A (1989) Le glaive et la balance. Remarques sur le rôle de la C.I.J. en matière de maintien de la paix et de la sécurité internationale. In: Dinstein Y (ed) International Law at a time of perplexity. Essays in honour of Shabtai Rosenne. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 539–566Google Scholar
  21. Riddel A, Plant B (2009) Evidence before the International Court of Justice. British Institute of International and Comparative Law, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Rivier (2007) La preuve devant les juridictions interetatiques à vocation universelle (CIJ et TIDM). In: Ruiz Fabri H, Sorel J-M (eds) La preuve devant les juridictions internationales. Pedone, Paris, pp 9–54Google Scholar
  23. Rosenne S (1983) Procedure in the International Court. A commentary on the 1978 rules of the International Court of Justice. Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenne S (2003) The World Court: what it is and how it works, 6th edn. Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  25. Sandifer D (1975) Evidence before international tribunals. University Press of Virginia, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  26. Santulli C (2005) Droit du contentieux international. Montchrestien, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. Starace V (1987) Processo internazionale. Enciclopedia del diritto 36:859–886Google Scholar
  28. Treves T (1998) The procedure before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: the rules of the tribunal and related documents. Leiden J Int Law 11:565–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Treves T (1999) Le controversie internazionali. Nuove tendenze, nuovi tribunali. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  30. Treves T (2005) Diritto internazionale. Problemi fondamentali, Giuffré, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  31. Treves T (2006) International law: achievements and challenges. Cursos Euromediterráneos Bancaja de Derecho Internacional 10:45–270Google Scholar
  32. Treves T (2007) Fragmentation of international law: the judicial perspective. Comunicazioni e Studi 23:821–876Google Scholar
  33. Treves T (2008) Aspects of legitimacy of decisions of international courts and tribunals. In: Wolfrum R, Röben V (eds) Legitimacy in international law. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Venturini G. (1975) Il principio “iura novit curia” e il processo internazionale. Comunicazioni e Studi 14:969–979Google Scholar
  35. Watts A (2002) New practice directions of the International Court of Justice. Law Pract Int Court Tribunals 1:247–256Google Scholar
  36. White G (1965) The use of experts by international tribunals. Syracuse University Press, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
  37. Wirth M, Rouvinez C, Knoll J (eds) (2011) The search for “Truth” in arbitration. Is finding the truth what dispute resolution is about. JurisNet, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Witenberg JC (1936) La théorie des preuves devant les juridictions internationales. Recueil des Cours 56:1–106Google Scholar
  39. Wolfrum R (2010) International courts and tribunals, evidence. Max Planck Encyclopedia of public international law. www.mpepil.com
  40. Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C, Thienel T (eds) (2006) The statute of the International Court of Justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of International LawUniversity of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations