Skip to main content

Disasters and Armed Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Disaster Response Law

Abstract

It is widely held in current opinion that in the event of disaster occurring in conflict-affected countries (the so-called mixed situations) International Humanitarian Law (IHL) exclusively governs humanitarian assistance and relief. This work explores the content and extent of the rights and obligations of the parties to an international or non-international armed conflict in the event of disaster. It focuses on humanitarian assistance and the relief provisions included in the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols, with special regard to Article 70 of Additional Protocol I and Article 18 of Additional Protocol II. Based on a survey of relevant international practice, the author finds that IHL plays a limited role in facilitating disaster assistance and relief, and that one important reason for this is that the rule of consent, constantly reaffirmed by pertinent treaties and agreements, may seriously obstruct assistance and relief. It is then argued that in mixed situations, IHL and IDRL should be considered complementary rather than alternative. The choice of which body of special rules to apply should be made on the basis of the respective degree of appropriateness for the specific situation, taking into consideration the clarity and precision of the pertinent provisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    NIACs, often arising from disputes over resources, currently characterize many developing countries especially in Africa and in Asia. See Ballentine, Sherman 2003, 259–283.

  2. 2.

    UNDP 2004, 72; Blouin et al. 2008, 548.

  3. 3.

    Brancati 2007, 725.

  4. 4.

    Fisher 2007, 368. See also Chap. 1 by de Guttry in this volume.

  5. 5.

    IFRC 2008, 10.

  6. 6.

    A/CN.4/L.758 of 24 July 2009.

  7. 7.

    ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996, ICJ Rep. 1996, 240 at para 25. See also ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Palestinian Occupied Territory, Advisory Opinion, 9 July 2004, para 106.

  8. 8.

    Uhler, Coursier 1958, 25; Sandoz et al. 1987, 33 at paras 47–51.

  9. 9.

    Gavshon 2009, 250.

  10. 10.

    General protection of the wounded and sick, evacuation, protection of hospital, medical staff and transportation, consignments of medical supplies, food and clothing, measures related to child welfare, family news and dispersed families: see GC IV Articles 13–26.

  11. 11.

    GC IV Articles 48–49.

  12. 12.

    GC IV Article 108.

  13. 13.

    GCs Article 3 para 2, AP II Articles 7–11.

  14. 14.

    Uhler, Coursier 1958, 51.

  15. 15.

    GC I, GC II and GC III Article 9, GC IV Article 10.

  16. 16.

    GC IV Article 111.

  17. 17.

    Sandoz 1979, 368; Moir 2004, 63.

  18. 18.

    Uhler, Coursier 1958, 97–98; Plattner 1996.

  19. 19.

    GC III Article 72.

  20. 20.

    GC III Article 73 and Annex III.

  21. 21.

    GC I Article 27; GC II Article 25.

  22. 22.

    Uhler, Coursier 1958, 319.

  23. 23.

    The obligation to accept relief implies the duty to give consent: see Bothe 1989, 93; Fisher 2007, 349–350; Gavshon 2009, 252.

  24. 24.

    GC IV Article 61.

  25. 25.

    GC IV Article 60. See Patrnogic 1984, 925.

  26. 26.

    GC I Article 62.

  27. 27.

    AP I Articles. 69–71.

  28. 28.

    Sandoz et al. 1987, 819 at para 2805; Fisher 2007, 350.

  29. 29.

    AP I Aticle 70 para 2. States allowing passage retain the right to prescribe the related technical arrangements, including search, and to make permission conditional on the distribution of assistance being made under the local supervision of a Protecting Power (Article 70 para 3).

  30. 30.

    AP I Article 70, para 1.

  31. 31.

    Henckaerts, Doswald Beck 2005, Rule 55.

  32. 32.

    AP I Article 70 para 1.

  33. 33.

    See Chap. 16 by Bizzarri in this volume.

  34. 34.

    Bothe 1989, 95.

  35. 35.

    Sandoz et al. 1987, 1479 at para 4885.

  36. 36.

    Idem at para 4884.

  37. 37.

    Keller 1992, Meedan Mekkonen 2006.

  38. 38.

    Eritrea/Ethiopia Disaster Diplomacy, http//www.disasterdiplomacy.org/Eritreaethiopia.html. Accessed 26 September 2011. See also Kelman 2012, 34–36.

  39. 39.

    Agreement between the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Government of the State of Eritrea, Algiers 12 December 2000, Article 5 para 1. The text of the agreement is available on the website of the Permanent Court of Arbitration: http://www.pca-cpa.org/upload/files/Algiers%20Agreement.pdf. Accessed 26 October 2011.

  40. 40.

    Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission, Final Award, Ports, Ethiopia’s claim 6, December 19, 2005 para 20, http://www.pca-cpa.org/upload/files/FINAL%20ET%20PORTS.pdf. Accessed 26 October 2011. See Heintschel von Heinegg 2009, 378–379.

  41. 41.

    Loc. cit. n. 40 para 22.

  42. 42.

    See Chap. 2 by Venturini in this volume.

  43. 43.

    Shoaf, Rottman 2000, 58; Brancati 2007, 724.

  44. 44.

    Brancati 2007, 724–725.

  45. 45.

    Shoaf, Rottman 2000, 59. Reports on IFRC operations are available on the Federation’s website: http://www.ifrc.org. Accessed 26 October 2011.

  46. 46.

    Reyntjens 2009, 194–201; Binder et al. 2010, 22–30.

  47. 47.

    In June 1999 the Democratic Republic of the Congo brought applications before the International Court of Justice against Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda concerning the alleged perpetration of acts of armed aggression in violation of the United Nations Charter and of the Charter of the Organization of African Unity. It discontinued proceedings against Burundi and Rwanda in 2001. The Court found Uganda responsible for violations of human rights treaties and IHL, particularly as occupying power in the province of Ituri (Armed activities on the territory of the Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda, Judgment of 19 December 2005, ICJ Rep. 2005).

  48. 48.

    Goma Volcano in 2002, http://www.disasterdiplomacy.org/casestudies.html. Accessed 30 September 2011. See also Kelman 2012, 83–84.

  49. 49.

    ICRC, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Eruption of Nyiragongo Volcano, Goma. 04.02.2002 Operational Update, http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jrmb.htm. Accessed 3 October 2011.

  50. 50.

    Sri Lanka: ICRC provides relief for tsunami victims, ICRC News Release 04/149 of 28 December 2004, http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/684m43.htm. Accessed 26 October 2011. Aceh: reconstruction will take years, ICRC Press Briefing of 6 September 2005, http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/tsunami-aceh-060905.htm. Accessed 30 September 2011.

  51. 51.

    Kennedy et al. 2008, 26–29.

  52. 52.

    Brancati 2007, 725–726; Kuhn 2009, 18; Kelman 2012, 41.

  53. 53.

    Loc. cit. But see Kennedy et al., 30.

  54. 54.

    The ICRC in Sri Lanka 01–05–2011 Overview, http://www.icrc.org/eng/where-we-work/asia-pacific/sri-lanka/overview-sri-lanka.htm. Accessed 30 September 2011.

  55. 55.

    Ross 2003, 6.

  56. 56.

    Sinitchkina 2005, 4.

  57. 57.

    Gaillard et al. 2008, 511; Kelman 2012, 42–44.

  58. 58.

    As expressed by the members of the Institut de Droit International (The effects of Armed Conflicts on Treaties 1985, articles 2 and 4).

  59. 59.

    International Law Commission 2011, Article 3 and Annex.

References

  • Ballentine K, Sherman J (eds) (2003) The political economy of armed conflict: beyond greed and grievance. Boulder, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder A, de Geoffroy V, Sokpoh B (2010) IASC cluster approach evaluation 2nd phase, country study. Democratic Republic of Congo, Global Public Policy Institute/Groupe URD, Berlin/Plaisians

    Google Scholar 

  • Blouin M, Pallage S (2008) Humanitarian relief and civil conflict. J Confl Resolut, 52:548–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothe M (1989) Relief actions: the position of the recipient state. In: Kalshoven F (ed) Assisting the victims of armed conflicts and other disasters: Papers delivered at the international conference on humanitarian assistance in armed conflict, The Hague, 22–24 June 1988. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancati D (2007) Political aftershocks: the impact of earthquakes on intrastate conflicts. J Confl Resolut 51:715–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher D (2007) Domestic regulation of international humanitarian relief in disasters and armed conflict: a comparative analysis. Int Rev Red Cross 866:345–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-C, Clavé E, Kelman I (2008) Wave of peace? Tsunami disaster diplomacy in Aceh, Indonesia. Geoforum 39:511–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavshon D (2009) The applicability of IHL in mixed situations of disaster and conflict. J Confl Secur L 14:243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heintschel von Heinegg W (2009) International Economic relations and armed conflict. In: de Guttry A, Post H, Venturini G (eds) The 1998–2000 war between Eritrea and Ethiopia. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 371–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Henckaerts J-M, Doswald Beck L (eds) (2005) Customary international humanitarian law, vol 1: rules. ICRC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • IFRC (2008) Introduction to the guidelines for the domestic facilitation and regulation of international disaster relief and initial recovery assistance. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut de Droit International (1985) The Effects of Armed Conflicts on Treaties, Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International 61:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • International Law Commission (2011) Draft articles on the effects of armed conflicts on treaties, Yearbook of the International law Commission, 2011, vol II, Part Two

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller EJ (1992) Drought, war and the politics of famine in Ethiopia and Eritrea. J Mod Afr Stud 30:609–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman I (2012) Disaster diplomacy: how disasters affect peace and conflict. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Ashmore J, Babister E, Kelman I (2008) The meaning of ‘build back better’: evidence from post–tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn R (2009) Tsunami and conflict in Sri Lanka, Josef Korbel School of International Studies. http://gfdrr.org/gfdrr/sites/gfdrr.org/files/New%20Folder/Kuhn_Tsunami%26Conflict.pdf

  • Meedan Mekonnen (2006) Drought, famine, and conflict: case from the horn of Africa. http://www.beyondintractability.org/

  • Moir L (2004) The law of internal armed conflict. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrnogic J (1984) Some reflections on humanitarian principles applicable in relief actions. In: Swinarski C (ed) Studies and essays on international humanitarian law and red cross principles in honour of Jean Pictet. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, pp 925–936

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner D (1996) La neutralité du CICR et la neutralité de l’assistance humanitaire, Revue Internationale de la Croix–Rouge, 818:169–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyntjens F (2009) The great African war: Congo and regional geopolitics, 1996–2006. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross ML (2003) Resources and rebellion in Aceh, Indonesia, UCLA Department of Political Science. http://www.aceheye.org. Accessed 30 Sept 2011

  • Sandoz Y (1979) Le droit d’initiative du CICR, Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht 22:352–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoz Y, Swinarski C, Zimmermann B (1987) Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, International Committee of the Red Cross, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva: Gasser H–P and Wenger C F (Protocol I) Eberlin P (Annex I) Junod S–S (Protocol II)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoaf KI, Rottman SJ (2000) Public health impact of disasters. Aust J Emerg Manag 15:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitchkina S (2005) Tsunami and Aceh conflict resolution, inventory of conflict and environment (ICE) case studies no 165. http://www1.american.edu/ted/ice/tsunami-aceh.htm

  • Uhler O, Coursier H (1958) Geneva Convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war: Commentary, ICRC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk. A challenge for development. United Nations Development Programme, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriella Venturini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Venturini, G. (2012). Disasters and Armed Conflict. In: de Guttry, A., Gestri, M., Venturini, G. (eds) International Disaster Response Law. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-882-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships