Skip to main content

‘List of Major Events’ Mechanism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Media and Sport

Part of the book series: ASSER International Sports Law Series ((ASSER))

  • 1407 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will discuss in depth the ‘list of major events’ mechanism, included in Article 14 of the AVMS Directive. The implementation of this Article in the different Member States will not be presented and analysed, but will only be touched upon when necessary. Section 14.1 will take a closer look at the origin and the philosophy of the ‘list of major events’ mechanism and will also discuss the criteria to designate events as being of major importance for society and the criteria to decide whether those events should be broadcast live. Section 14.2 will give an overview of a number of other constituent elements of this Article that are posing or could pose problems in the changing media landscape (e.g. ‘free-to-air television,’ ‘substantial proportion’). Section 14.3 will be structured around the problems of effective implementation of this mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Home Box Office, Inc v. FCC 567 F.2d 9 (D.C. Cir 1977).

  2. 2.

    Boardman and Hargreaves-Heap 1999, 173.

  3. 3.

    Gratton and Solberg 2007, 208.

  4. 4.

    Fraser and McMahon 2002, 2.

  5. 5.

    Fleming 1997, 282.

  6. 6.

    European Parliament 1996.

  7. 7.

    Castille 1997, 11.

  8. 8.

    Oreja 1997.

  9. 9.

    European Commission 1997, SEC(1997)0174/9.

  10. 10.

    Recital 19 of the TWF Directive.

  11. 11.

    European Commission 1997, SEC(1997)0174/9., para 3.

  12. 12.

    Council of Europe 2001.

  13. 13.

    Council of Europe 2009a, b, c.

  14. 14.

    Council of Europe 2009c, 10.

  15. 15.

    Council of Europe 2011.

  16. 16.

    Commission of the European Communities 2003c, COM(2002) 778 final, 10.

  17. 17.

    Commission of the European Communities 2003b, COM(2003) 784 final, 16; European Commission 2005.

  18. 18.

    DCMS 2005, 15.

  19. 19.

    Craufurd Smith and Bottcher 2002, 120.

  20. 20.

    Example: Article 153, § 1, 2° of the Flemish Community Media Decree; Article I, § 4 (1), 3° of the Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights 2001.

  21. 21.

    Example: Article 4, § 2 (1) of the French Community Media Decree; Article 1 (2) (a) of the Decision No 8/1999.

  22. 22.

    Example: Article 153, § 1, 2° of the Flemish Community Media Decree; Article I, § 4 (1), 4° of the Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights; Article 2 (1) (d) of the Decision No 8/1999.

  23. 23.

    Example: Article 2 (1) (c) of the Decision No 8/1999; Article 153, § 1, 2° of the Flemish Community Media Decree states.

  24. 24.

    Example: Article 2 (1) (b) of the Decision No 8/1999; Article I, § 4 (1), 2° of the Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights states; Article 153, § 1, 3° of the Flemish Community Media Decree 2009.

  25. 25.

    Council of Europe 2002, para 10.

  26. 26.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 88.

  27. 27.

    GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 113.

  28. 28.

    Ibid., para 140.

  29. 29.

    De Morgen 2011b.

  30. 30.

    Broadcasting (Major Events Television Coverage) Act 1999 (Designation of Major Events) Order 2003.

  31. 31.

    Reding 2004, 3.

  32. 32.

    Article 1, § 1, 6° of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  33. 33.

    Broadcasting (Major Events Television Coverage) Act 1999 (Designation of Major Events) Order 2003.

  34. 34.

    European Commission 1997, SEC(1997)0174/9.

  35. 35.

    Commission of the European Communities 2003b, COM(2003) 784 final, 16.

  36. 36.

    Ofcom 2008a, Annex 1.

  37. 37.

    Article 1, § 1 (2) of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  38. 38.

    § 5a of the Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting.

  39. 39.

    § 1 (2) of the Ordinance on events of substantial social interest.

  40. 40.

    Article 2 of the Decision No 8/1999.

  41. 41.

    Weatherill 2007, 236.

  42. 42.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07; GC, UEFA v European Commission,.

  43. 43.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 59; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 64; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 116.

  44. 44.

    GC2010a, paras 53, 54; GC2010b, para 76.

  45. 45.

    European Commission 2010.

  46. 46.

    GC2010b, para 82.

  47. 47.

    Sportbusiness International 2008b.

  48. 48.

    Ministry for Culture, Media and Sports 1997.

  49. 49.

    Craufurd Smith and Bottcher 2002, 130.

  50. 50.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 56; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 60; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 52.

  51. 51.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 57; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 61; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 53.

  52. 52.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 70; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 72; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 103.

  53. 53.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 69; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 71; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 103.

  54. 54.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 102.

  55. 55.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 70; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 72; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 103.

  56. 56.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 120; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 102; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 136.

  57. 57.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 123; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, paras 103 and 105; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 127.

  58. 58.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 117; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 99; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 124.

  59. 59.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 118; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 100; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 125.

  60. 60.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 133; GC, UEFA v European Commission, paras 76 and 138.

  61. 61.

    C-204/11 P pending case 2011; C-205/11 P pending case 2011; C-201/11 P pending case 2011.

  62. 62.

    Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2009.

  63. 63.

    Telegraph 2008a; Broadcastnow 2008.

  64. 64.

    Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2009, 8; The Guardian 2008c; Telegraph 2008a.

  65. 65.

    Raymond Boyle 2010.

  66. 66.

    Sportbusiness International 2010; Sports-city 2010.

  67. 67.

    Article 1, § 1, 10° of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  68. 68.

    Commission decision of 25 June 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by Belgium pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities. OJ (2007) L 180/24, para 15.

  69. 69.

    Article 153, § 1 of the Flemish Community Media Decree 2009.

  70. 70.

    European Commission 2010.

  71. 71.

    VRT 2009.

  72. 72.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 423.

  73. 73.

    Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2009, 17; FACTS 2001.

  74. 74.

    Cricket Australia 2009.

  75. 75.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 423.

  76. 76.

    Ibid., 423.

  77. 77.

    Ibid., 423.

  78. 78.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 89.

  79. 79.

    § 2 of the Ordinance on events of substantial social interest.

  80. 80.

    Article I, §3 (1) of the Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights.

  81. 81.

    Article 4, § 3 of the Decree No 2004-1392.

  82. 82.

    Article 3 of the Order designating events of major importance and determining the procedures for making them accessible).

  83. 83.

    Ofcom 2008a, para 1.12.

  84. 84.

    Ibid., para 1.3.

  85. 85.

    Geey and Ward 2008, 4.

  86. 86.

    Ofcom 2008a, paras 1.13–1.17; Geey and Ward 2008, 4.

  87. 87.

    Ofcom 2008a, paras 1.3, 1.18, 1.19.

  88. 88.

    Independent Advisory Panel to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport 2009, paras 140–149.

  89. 89.

    Ibid., para 145.

  90. 90.

    Ibid., paras 140–149.

  91. 91.

    Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010; Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010b; Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010c.

  92. 92.

    Lefever et al. 2010, 400.

  93. 93.

    Harrison and Woods 2007, p286–287.

  94. 94.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, p417–418.

  95. 95.

    Hitchens 2006, 224.

  96. 96.

    European Parliament 1996.

  97. 97.

    Committee of the Regions 1997, para 2.

  98. 98.

    Commission of the European Communities 2007b, COM (2007) 391 final, 17.

  99. 99.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 410.

  100. 100.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, paras 51–53; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, paras 55–57; GC, UEFA v European Commission, paras 47–49.

  101. 101.

    Council of Europe 2002, para 9.

  102. 102.

    Harrison and Woods 2007, 282.

  103. 103.

    Helberger 2005, 90.

  104. 104.

    Harrison and Woods 2007, p7–10.

  105. 105.

    Commission of the European Communities 2000, Notification of 14 July 2000, para 20.

  106. 106.

    De Standaard 2008.

  107. 107.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 415.

  108. 108.

    In 2002, the Danish Government decided to revoke the Danish Order including the listed the events (Revocation of the Danish Order on the use of TV rights to events of major importance to society. OJ (2002) C 45/7).

  109. 109.

    Section 4 (2) of the Order on the use of TV rights to events of major importance for society.

  110. 110.

    Commission decision, 2 April 2003, para 39.

  111. 111.

    Ofcom 2009, para 3.49.

  112. 112.

    Ibid., para 3.49.

  113. 113.

    Frontier Economics 2009, 32.

  114. 114.

    European Commission 2002a, para 2.4.47.

  115. 115.

    Frontier Economics 2009, 32.

  116. 116.

    Donders and Evens 2010.

  117. 117.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 414.

  118. 118.

    Article 5a § 1 of the Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting.

  119. 119.

    Ofcom 2008a, para 1.18.

  120. 120.

    For example: Article 4 (1) of the Broadcasting (major events television coverage) Act 1999, Statute Book S.I. 28/1999; Article 3 of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  121. 121.

    Article 3, § 3 of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  122. 122.

    Article I, § 3 (3) of the Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights.

  123. 123.

    Parrish and Miettinen 2009, 28; Helberger 2005, 97.

  124. 124.

    See e.g.: The Guardian 2008a; BBC News 2008b.

  125. 125.

    Article I, § 3 (4) of the Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights.

  126. 126.

    Article 5a, § 1 of the Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting.

  127. 127.

    Article I, § 3 (4) of the Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights.

  128. 128.

    Article 166 (1) (b) of the Broadcasting Act 2009.

  129. 129.

    ACMA2006, 2.

  130. 130.

    Section 115 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.

  131. 131.

    Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 5.

  132. 132.

    Subsection 115 (1AA) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  133. 133.

    Subsection 115 (1AB) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  134. 134.

    Parliament of Australia 2004, Bills Digest No. 73 2004-05; Subsection 115 (1AA) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  135. 135.

    ACMA2006, 2.

  136. 136.

    Productivity Commission 2000, 435.

  137. 137.

    ASTRA 2009; Basketball Australia 2009.

  138. 138.

    Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010c.

  139. 139.

    See e.g.: Parliament of Australia 1998a, Bills Digest No. 6 1998-99; Free TV Australia 2009, 22; Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2009, 6.

  140. 140.

    Parliament of Australia 1998a, Bills Digest No. 6 1998-99.

  141. 141.

    Paragraph 10 (1) (e) of Schedule 2 of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  142. 142.

    There are three situations in which a person is a programme supplier of a commercial broadcaster: (1) the person supplies or may be reasonably expected to supply a commercial television broadcasting licensee with two-thirds of its sporting programmes, (2) the person is a related body corporate of the licensee, or (3) where the ACMA declares the person to be a programme supplier for the purposes of the ‘must offer’ rules (Section 146D (2)–(5) of the Broadcasting Services Act).

  143. 143.

    Commission of the European Communities 2003a, COM(2003) 541 final, 17.

  144. 144.

    Independent Advisory Panel to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport 2009, para 80.

  145. 145.

    Article 4, § 3 of the French Community Media Decree.

  146. 146.

    Article 2 of the Decision No 8/1999.

  147. 147.

    Article I, § 3 (2) of the Austrian Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights.

  148. 148.

    Lefever and Evens 2009a, 32.

  149. 149.

    Commissie voor Cultuur, Jeugd, Sport en Media 2010, 6.

  150. 150.

    Commission of the European Communities 2005, COM(2005) 204 final, 9.

  151. 151.

    Lefever and Evens 2009b; Lefever and Van Rompuy 2009, 263.

  152. 152.

    This subsection is a revised, updated and more elaborated version of the following articles: Lefever and Evens 2009a, 29–33; Lefever et al. 2009, 513–520.

  153. 153.

    Vlaams Parlement 2008, 16.

  154. 154.

    Ibid., 53.

  155. 155.

    Article 2 of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  156. 156.

    Vlaamse Regering 2011a.

  157. 157.

    Flemish Media Regulator 2011.

  158. 158.

    Sportbusiness International 2008c.

  159. 159.

    The Guardian 2010a, b.

  160. 160.

    The Guardian 2011.

  161. 161.

    De Morgen 2011a.

  162. 162.

    The Wall Street Journal 2011.

  163. 163.

    Recital 25 of the AVMS Directive.

  164. 164.

    Valcke et al. 2010, 276.

  165. 165.

    YouTube 2011.

  166. 166.

    Lefever and Werkers 2010, 217.

  167. 167.

    Valcke et al. 2010, 276.

  168. 168.

    European Commission 2005.

  169. 169.

    ACMA2007.

  170. 170.

    Article I, § 3 (1) of the Austrian Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights.

  171. 171.

    § 98 (2) of the Broadcasting Act 1996; Ofcom 2008a, para 1.6.

  172. 172.

    Article 1 (1) of the Broadcasting (major events television coverage) Act.

  173. 173.

    Article 1 (3) of the Broadcasting (major events television coverage) Act.

  174. 174.

    Irish Parliament 1999.

  175. 175.

    Article 2 of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  176. 176.

    Commissie voor Cultuur, Jeugd, Sport en Media 2010, 6.

  177. 177.

    Vlaamse Regering 2011b.

  178. 178.

    Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2009, 20.

  179. 179.

    Productivity Commission 2000, 224.

  180. 180.

    Ofcom 2009, para 4.74.

  181. 181.

    Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2009, 20.

  182. 182.

    Standing Committee on Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts 2006, para 3.96.

  183. 183.

    Article 1, § 1, 3° & 10° of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  184. 184.

    Free TV Australia 2009.

  185. 185.

    Tennis Australia 2009.

  186. 186.

    See e.g. Rowe 2009.

  187. 187.

    Lefever and Evens 2009a, 33.

  188. 188.

    Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering 2009, 233.

  189. 189.

    De Tijd 2009, 7.

  190. 190.

    De Marez and Schuurman 2010, 16.

  191. 191.

    Lefever and Evens 2009a, 33; Lefever et al. 2009, 520.

  192. 192.

    Article 228 of the Flemish Community Media Decree 2009.

  193. 193.

    Subsection 41A of Schedule 4 of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  194. 194.

    X 2009, 16.

  195. 195.

    Sportbusiness International 2008a; The Australian 2008.

  196. 196.

    See e.g.: Free TV Australia 2009, 19–21.

  197. 197.

    See e.g.: ASTRA 2009, 17–18; Basketball Australia 2009, 2.

  198. 198.

    Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010a.

  199. 199.

    These reforms will take effect from 1 January 2011 (Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010).

  200. 200.

    Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010.

  201. 201.

    Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2010b, c.

  202. 202.

    Independent Advisory Panel to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport 2009, para 39.

  203. 203.

    EICTA 2008a.

  204. 204.

    EICTA 2008b.

  205. 205.

    De Marez and Schuurman 2010, 6, 7, 10.

  206. 206.

    Council of Europe 2003 , p. 21; Weatherill 2007, 237.

  207. 207.

    FIFA v. Commission, 4 October 2007, Case T-385/07. OJ (2007) C 315/41.

  208. 208.

    UEFA v. Commission, 5 February 2008, Case T-55/08. OJ (2008) C 107/28.

  209. 209.

    BBC News 2008a.

  210. 210.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 165.

  211. 211.

    Ofcom 2009, paras 4.78 and 4.163.

  212. 212.

    Ofcom 2007a, para 5.28; Ofcom 2009, para 4.73.

  213. 213.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 178.

  214. 214.

    Gratton and Solberg 2007, 213; Craufurd Smith and Bottcher 2002, 126; Weatherill 2007, 238.

  215. 215.

    Ofcom 2008a, Annex 1.

  216. 216.

    Independent Advisory Panel to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport 2009, para 76.

  217. 217.

    For example, since 1988, the value of the European television rights for the Olympics has increased at a rate of 65 % per summer event and 77 % per winter event (Ofcom 2007b, 53).

  218. 218.

    Free TV Australia 2009; GC 2010b, para 48.

  219. 219.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 146; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 142; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 183.

  220. 220.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, paras 141–145; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, paras 137–141; GC, UEFA v European Commission, paras 178–182.

  221. 221.

    See business model of Formula One: infra.

  222. 222.

    Kesenne 2011.

  223. 223.

    Ofcom 2008a.

  224. 224.

    Commission decision, 25 June 2007, para 7.

  225. 225.

    Commission decision, 16 October 2007, para 7.

  226. 226.

    Conn 2009.

  227. 227.

    Sportcal.com 2010.

  228. 228.

    A complete economic impact assessment of the ‘list of major events’ mechanism falls outside the scope of this book.

  229. 229.

    ASTRA 2009; Basketball Australia 2009; Productivity Commission 2000, 443.

  230. 230.

    Zeffman 2009; Baron 2009.

  231. 231.

    Jeanrenaud and Kesenne 2006, 5.

  232. 232.

    Wise and Meyer 1997, 1805; The New York Times 1996.

  233. 233.

    Commission decision, 23 July 2003, para 33.

  234. 234.

    Ibid., para 30 (h).

  235. 235.

    Ofcom 2007b, 8; Zeffman 2009; Ogston 2009.

  236. 236.

    Sportbusiness International 2011a.

  237. 237.

    Sportbusiness International 2011b.

  238. 238.

    Barnet 2009.

  239. 239.

    The New York Times 1996.

  240. 240.

    Article 49 (1) of the Olympic Charter 2007.

  241. 241.

    MediaNetwork 2008; The Guardian 2008b; Telegraph 2008b; Sports City 2008; IOC 2009.

  242. 242.

    Traditional coverage includes, at a minimum, for each country, coverage of the Opening and Closing Ceremonies of the Winter Games and the Summer Games, any medal rounds or other significant events featuring a competitor from such country, and any other major events which have traditionally been among the highest in terms of viewer interest within such country (IOC 2008, para 2.3).

  243. 243.

    Free-to-air means broadcasting of audiovisual programming in a manner that approximately 95 % of television households within such country have access to and can actually receive such broadcasts, without any specific fee, charge or premium for the Olympic Games programming (IOC 2008, para 2.3).

  244. 244.

    IOC 2008, para 2.3.

  245. 245.

    The Ashes is a Test cricket series played between England and Australia.

  246. 246.

    For more information, see: House of Commons—Culture, Media and Sport Committee 2006.

  247. 247.

    Free TV Australia 2009; Ofcom 2007b, 63.

  248. 248.

    Barnet 2009; The Guardian 2009; Free TV Australia 2009; Rowe 2009.

  249. 249.

    Barnet 2009.

  250. 250.

    Nicholas 2009.

  251. 251.

    Jeanrenaud and Kesenne 2006, 5.

  252. 252.

    European Parliament 2002, para 9.

  253. 253.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, paras 79–81; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, paras 144–148.

  254. 254.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, paras 84–96; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, paras 150–158; GC, UEFA v European Commission, paras 87–107.

  255. 255.

    Revocation of the Danish Order on the use of TV rights to events of major importance to society. OJ (2002) C 45/7.

  256. 256.

    Articles 5.1–5.3 of the Media Act of 29 December 2008; Articles 18–21 of the Media Decree of 29 December 2008.

  257. 257.

    ICRI et al. 2009a.

  258. 258.

    Article 20b of the Broadcasting Act of 29 December 1992; ICRI et al. 2009b.

  259. 259.

    Schoental 2006, 4.

  260. 260.

    The contact committee is established pursuant to Article 29 of AVMS Directive.

  261. 261.

    This principle of mutual recognition has been recognised in the TV Danmark case. For more information about this case, see: R. v. Independent Television Commission, ex parte TV Danmark 1 [2001] 1 WLR 74; House of Lords. R v. ITC, Ex Parte TV Danmark 1 Ltd, judgment of 25 July 2001, [2001] UKHL 42; Schoental 2006, 1–8; 2002, 107–133, Valcke et al. 2010, 296.

  262. 262.

    Article 14 (3) of the AVMS Directive. Valcke et al. 2010, 296.

  263. 263.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 427.

  264. 264.

    For more information about this decision being a challengeable act, see: GC, Infront WM AG v Commission of the European Communities; CJ, Commission of the European Communities v Infront WM AG; Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 426, 427; Valcke et al. 2010, 296, 297.

  265. 265.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, para 59; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 64; GC, UEFA v European Commission, Case T-55/08, para 74.

  266. 266.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 59.

  267. 267.

    Ibid., para 60.

  268. 268.

    Ibid., para 71; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 73; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 75.

  269. 269.

    GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 74.

  270. 270.

    Ibid., para 98.

  271. 271.

    ACMA2006, 2; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 5.

  272. 272.

    Perrine 2001, 25.

  273. 273.

    Healy 2009, 222.

  274. 274.

    European Commission State aid E 3/2005 (European Commission decision of 24 April 2007) (hereafter: German public broadcaster state aid case), para 301. (hereafter: German public broadcaster state aid case); Productivity Commission 2000, 437, 438.

  275. 275.

    German public broadcaster state aid case, para 301.

  276. 276.

    Productivity Commission 2000, 437.

  277. 277.

    De Standaard 2009.

  278. 278.

    However, this match was broadcast on www.nieuwsblad.ne/sportwereld (Voetbalbelgië 2009).

  279. 279.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 168.

  280. 280.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 82.

  281. 281.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, para 1.

  282. 282.

    Subsection 115(1) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  283. 283.

    ACMA2006, 2.

  284. 284.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, para 5; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 8; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2001, 23.

  285. 285.

    Broadcasting Services (Events) Notice (No. 1) 2004—Explanatory Statement, Government Notices Gazette 19 May 2004.

  286. 286.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, para 6; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 8.

  287. 287.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, paras 5 and 27; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 8.

  288. 288.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, para 11.

  289. 289.

    Ibid., para 7; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 8.

  290. 290.

    Parliament of Australia 1998a, Bills Digest No. 6 1998-99.

  291. 291.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, paras 13 and 19.

  292. 292.

    Ibid., para 20.

  293. 293.

    Ibid., para 21.

  294. 294.

    Ibid., paras 35, 36.

  295. 295.

    Ibid., para 14.

  296. 296.

    Ibid., para 22.

  297. 297.

    Ibid., para 30.

  298. 298.

    Ibid., para 23.

  299. 299.

    Ibid., para 23.

  300. 300.

    Ibid., para 27.

  301. 301.

    Ibid., para 29.

  302. 302.

    Ibid., para 37.

  303. 303.

    Ibid., para 38; Parliament of Australia 1999a, Broadcasting Services Amendment Act (No. 1) 1999.

  304. 304.

    Commercial free-to-air broadcasters include Networks, 7, 9 and 10 (Parliament of Australia 1998a, Bills Digest No. 6 1998-99).

  305. 305.

    1 Australian Dollar (Section 146H (7) of the Broadcasting Services Act).

  306. 306.

    Section 146A of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  307. 307.

    1 Australian Dollar (Section 146N (6) of the Broadcasting Services Act).

  308. 308.

    Section 146A of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  309. 309.

    Ibid.; Section 146D of the Broadcasting Services Act; Parliament of Australia 1998a, Bills Digest No. 6 1998-99.

  310. 310.

    ACMA is the Australian Communications and Media Authority. On 1 July 2005, the Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA) was merged with the Australian Communications Authority to form the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).

  311. 311.

    Section 146D (2)–(5) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  312. 312.

    Parliament of Australia 1998a, Bills Digest No. 6 1998–99.

  313. 313.

    Section 146E (1) & 146L (2) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  314. 314.

    Section 146F (1) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  315. 315.

    Paragraph 7(1)(h) of Schedule 2—Part 3 of the Broadcasting Services Act: “the licensee will not use broadcasting services in the commission of an offence against another Act or a law of a State or Territory”.

  316. 316.

    Section 141 of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  317. 317.

    Section 143 of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  318. 318.

    2000 penalty units is currently 220,000 Australian Dollar (Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 11).

  319. 319.

    Section 139 (2) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  320. 320.

    Section 139 (2) of the Broadcasting Services Act; Parliament of Australia 1998a, Bills Digest No. 6 1998-99; Parliament of Australia 1999b. Bills Digest No. 58 1999-2000.

  321. 321.

    Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983.

  322. 322.

    Special Broadcasting Service Act 1991.

  323. 323.

    Sections 146E (2) & 146L (3) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  324. 324.

    Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 9.

  325. 325.

    Sections 146K (1) & 146Q (1) of the Broadcasting Services Act, 5.

  326. 326.

    Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 11 and 17.

  327. 327.

    Ibid., 11; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2001, 24.

  328. 328.

    Australian Broadcasting Authority 2001, 24.

  329. 329.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, Schedule 1—New section 146C; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 14.

  330. 330.

    Broadcasting Services (Designated Series of Events) Declaration No. 1 of 2000; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 9; Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2009.

  331. 331.

    Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 23.

  332. 332.

    Communications (Redundant Regulation) Instrument of Revocation (No. 1) 2009.

  333. 333.

    Section 146G (1) & 146M (1) of the Broadcasting Services Act; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 10.

  334. 334.

    Section 146G (2) & 146M (2) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  335. 335.

    Section 146H (2) & 146N (2) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  336. 336.

    Section 146H (3) & 146N (3) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  337. 337.

    Section 146H (4) & 146N (4) of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  338. 338.

    Section 146J & 146P of the Broadcasting Services Act.

  339. 339.

    Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 10.

  340. 340.

    Ibid., 24.

  341. 341.

    Ibid., 9.

  342. 342.

    Ibid., 24.

  343. 343.

    Ibid., 15, 16.

  344. 344.

    Perrine 2001, 26; Australian Broadcasting Authority 2000, 8; Productivity Commission 2000, 434.

  345. 345.

    Bruce Meagher, Director, Strategy and Communications Division, SBS cited in Standing Committee on Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts 2006, para 3.103.

  346. 346.

    Australian Government 2006, 33, 34; Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts 2006.

  347. 347.

    Standing Committee on Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts 2006, para 3.99.

  348. 348.

    Lefever and Werkers 2010, 404.

  349. 349.

    Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2009, 17.

  350. 350.

    Lefever and Van Rompuy 2009, 267.

  351. 351.

    Böttcher and Castendyk 2008, 90; Valcke et al. 2010, 264, 265.

  352. 352.

    CJ, François De Coster v Collège des bourgmestre et échevins de Watermael-Boitsfort, para 28.

  353. 353.

    Valcke et al. 2010, 264, 265.

  354. 354.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 49; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 53; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 45.

  355. 355.

    CJ, Procureur du Roi v Marc J.V.C. Debauve, para 12.

  356. 356.

    CJ, Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands, para 19.

  357. 357.

    European Commission 2002b, 7.

  358. 358.

    See e.g. CJ, Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda et al. v Commissariaat voor de Media; CJ, United Pan-Europe Communications Belgium SA, Coditel Brabant SPRL, Société Intercommunale pour la Diffusion de la Télévision (Brutélé), Wolu TV ASBL v État belge (hereafter: UPC Belgium case).

  359. 359.

    Rapid Press Releases 2007a.

  360. 360.

    Commission of the European Communities 2007a, SEC(2007) 32, 5.

  361. 361.

    Valcke 2004, 337.

  362. 362.

    At European level, the must-carry obligation is included in Article 31 of the 2002/22/EC (hereafter: Universal Service Directive).

  363. 363.

    UPC Belgium case, para 41.

  364. 364.

    UPC Belgium case, paras 47 and 51; Valcke et al. 2010, 266, 267.

  365. 365.

    CJ, Elliniki Radiophonia Tiléorassi AE and Panellinia Omospondia Syllogon Prossopikou v Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis and Sotirios Kouvelas and Nicolaos Avdellas and others, para 43.

  366. 366.

    Ibid., para 45.

  367. 367.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 48; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 52; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 44.

  368. 368.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, paras 51 and 158; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, paras 55 and 127; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 47.

  369. 369.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 53; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 57; GC, UEFA v European Commission, para 49.

  370. 370.

    Tichy 2004, 5.

  371. 371.

    Ibid., 5; Klabbers 2009, 151.

  372. 372.

    Tichy 2004, 6.

  373. 373.

    Klabbers 2009, 165.

  374. 374.

    Dommering 2008, 76.

  375. 375.

    UPC Belgium case, para 44.

  376. 376.

    Ibid., para 51.

  377. 377.

    Ibid., para 51.

  378. 378.

    European Commission 2002b, 8.

  379. 379.

    Article 31, § 1 of the Universal Service Directive.

  380. 380.

    European Commission 2002b, 8.

  381. 381.

    UPC Belgium case, para 46.

  382. 382.

    Rapid Press Releases 2009. Although Belgium amended the Electronic Communications Act of the bilingual region of Brussels-Capital in March 2007, the European Commission was of the opinion that it concerns on proportionality and transparency of the must-carry rules were not addressed (Rapid Press Releases 2008c, 2009).

  383. 383.

    CJ, Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda et al.v Commissariaat voor de Media, para 15; CJ, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Rundfunkanstalten (ARD) v PRO Sieben Media AG, para 51.

  384. 384.

    European Commission 2002b, 7.

  385. 385.

    CJ, Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda et al.v Commissariaat voor de Media, para 15.

  386. 386.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, paras 16 and 34.

  387. 387.

    Ibid., para 36.

  388. 388.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 108; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 86.

  389. 389.

    GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, para 132; GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, para 111.

  390. 390.

    Castendyk 2008, 443, 444.

  391. 391.

    ECHR, Groppera Radio AG and others v. Switzerland, para 55.

  392. 392.

    Parliament of Australia 1998b, Regulation impact statement, paras 15, 16.

  393. 393.

    Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 2009, 17; FACTS 2001, 13.

  394. 394.

    ECHR, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom, para 49.

  395. 395.

    Dommering 2008, 43.

  396. 396.

    ECHR, Groppera Radio AG and others v. Switzerland, paras 69, 70; ECHR, Autronic AG v. Switzerland, paras 58, 59; Marauhn 2007, 117.

  397. 397.

    ECHR, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway, para 58; ECHR, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom, para 62.

  398. 398.

    Voorhoof 1995, 59.

  399. 399.

    See e.g. ECHR, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, para 49; ECHR, Perna v. Italy, para 39.

  400. 400.

    Council of Europe 2007, 9.

  401. 401.

    Helberger 2003, 81.

  402. 402.

    Scheuer and Schoenthal 2008, 419.

  403. 403.

    DCMS,http://www.culture.gov.uk/PDF/sport_on_television.pdf.

  404. 404.

    Helberger 2005, 106.

  405. 405.

    De Standaard 2009.

  406. 406.

    Football events involving national teams have a special general resonance in Belgium as they give Belgian teams the opportunity to promote Belgian football at international level (Commission decision of 25 June 2007).

  407. 407.

    Article 1, § 1 of the Order of the Flemish Government establishing the list of events of major importance to society.

  408. 408.

    UNESCO, http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1525&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.

  409. 409.

    Protocol (No. 32) annexed to the EC Treaty on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States.

  410. 410.

    Ofcom 2008b, 23.

  411. 411.

    Protocol (No. 32) annexed to the EC Treaty on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States; Katsirea 2008, i.

  412. 412.

    Article 6 (3) of the EC Treaty.

  413. 413.

    Protocol (No. 32) annexed to the EC Treaty on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States; Ridinger 2009, 6.

  414. 414.

    Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2006a, Article 4.

  415. 415.

    Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2006b, Clauses 8 & 10.

  416. 416.

    BBC Trust 2007, 1 & 7.

  417. 417.

    Commission decision, 22 June 2006, para 79.

  418. 418.

    For more detailed information, see e.g.: Rapid Press Releases 2005a, b, 2006, 2008a, b; European Commission, 27 February 2008; Commission decision, 22 June 2006.

  419. 419.

    German public broadcaster state aid case, para 242; Rapid Press Releases 2007b, 2.

  420. 420.

    German public broadcaster state aid case, para 335.

  421. 421.

    European Commission, 27 February 2008, para 87.

  422. 422.

    Commission decision, 22 June 2006, para 23.

  423. 423.

    Commission decision, 10 December 2003, para 72.

  424. 424.

    Rowe 2004, 388.

  425. 425.

    Wessberg 2000.

References

Legislation and Policy Documents UNESCO

European Union Protocols

  • Protocol (No. 32) annexed to the EC Treaty on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States. OJ (1997) C 340/109

    Google Scholar 

Communications

  • European Commission (1997) Communication of the European Commission, on the initiative of Commissioner Marcellino Oreja, on exclusive rights for TV broadcasting of major (sports) events. 5 Febr 1997, SEC(1997)0174/9

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2003a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the transition from analogue to digital broadcasting (from digital ‘switchover’ to analogue ‘switch-off’). 17 Sept 2003, COM(2003) 541 final

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2003b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The future of European regulatory audiovisual policy. 15 Dec 2003, COM(2003) 784 final

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2005) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on accelerating the transition from analogue to digital broadcasting. 24 May 2005, COM(2005) 204 final

    Google Scholar 

Decisions

  • European Parliament decision on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a European Parliament and Council Directive amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (C4-0380/96—95/0074(COD)) (Codecision procedure: second reading). OJ (1996) C 362/0056

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission decision of 2 April 2003 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M. 2876. Newscorp/Telepiù). OJ (2004) L 110/73

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission decision of 23 July 2003 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, COMP/C.2-37.398—Joint selling of the commercial rights of the UEFA Champions League. OJ (2003) L 291/25

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission decision of 10 December 2003 on State aid implemented by France for France 2 and France 3 (notified under document number C(2003) 4497). OJ (2004) L 361/21

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission decision of 22 June 2006 on the ad hoc financing of Dutch public service broadcasters, C 2/2004 (EX NN 170/2003). OJ (2008) L 49/1

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission decision of 24 April 2007, State aid E 3/2005 (ex- CP 2/2003, CP 232/2002, CP 43/2003, CP 243/2004 and CP 195/2004)—Financing of public service broadcasters in Germany, C (2007) 1761 final

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission decision of 25 June 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by Belgium pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities. OJ (2007) L 180/24

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission decision of 16 October 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities. OJ (2007) L 295/12

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission State aid E 4/2005 (ex NN 99/1999)—Ireland. State financing of Radio Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ) and Teilifís na Gaeilge (TG4), 27 Febr 2008, C(2008)723 final

    Google Scholar 

Directives

  • European Parliament and Council Directive 2002/22/EC of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive). OJ (2002) L 108/51

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). OJ (2010) L 95/1

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council Directive of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). OJ (2010) L 95/1

    Google Scholar 

Notifications

  • Commission of the European Communities (2000) Notification of 14 July 2000 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC), No 4064/89 (Case No COMP/M.2050—Vivendi/Canal+/Seagram), 13 Oct 2000

    Google Scholar 

Reports

  • Commission of the European Communities (2003) Fourth Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the application of Directive 89/552/EEC “Television without Frontiers. 6 January 2003, COM(2002) 778 final

    Google Scholar 

Resolutions

  • Committee of the Regions (1997) Resolution of the Committee of the Regions on the ‘Broadcasting rights of major sport events. OJ (1997) C 379/67

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (1996) Resolution on the broadcasting of sports events. OJ (1996) C 166/109

    Google Scholar 

Commission Staff Working Documents

  • Commission of the European Communities (2007) Commission Staff working document—Media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union. 16 January 2007, SEC(2007) 32

    Google Scholar 

White Papers

  • Commission of the European Communities (2007) White Paper on Sport. 11 July 2007, COM (2007) 391 final

    Google Scholar 

Press releases

  • Rapid Press Releases (2005a) State aid: Commission requests Germany, Ireland and The Netherlands to clarify role and financing of public service broadcasters, 3 March 2005, IP/05/250

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2005b) State aid: Commission closes inquiries into French, Italian and Spanish public broadcasters following commitments to amend funding systems, 20 April 2005, IP/05/458

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2006) State aid: Commission requests Belgium to clarify financing of public service broadcaster VRT, 20 July 2006, IP/06/1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2007a) Media pluralism: Commission stresses need for transparency, freedom and diversity in Europe’s media landscape, 16 January 2007, IP/07/52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2007b) State aid: Commission closes investigation regarding the financing regime for German public service broadcasters—frequently asked questions, 24 April 2007, MEMO/07/150

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2008a) State aid: Commission requests Austria to clarify financing of public service broadcaster ORF, 31 January 2008, IP/08/130

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2008b) State aid: Commission closes investigation into financing of Flemish public service broadcaster VRT, 27 Febr 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2008c) Telecoms Rules: Belgium receives final warning on broadcasting “must-carry” rules, 6 May 2008, IP/08/699

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid Press Releases (2009) Telecoms: Legal action against Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden closed while Belgian must-carry rules case goes to Court, 8 Oct 2009, IP/09/1491

    Google Scholar 

Speeches

  • Reding R (2004) Sport and television: ready to face new challenges? SPEECH/04/448

    Google Scholar 

Miscellaneous

Council of Europe Conventions

Protocols

Reports

Miscellaneous

Australia Legislation

Reports

Investigations

Miscellaneous

Austria Legislation

  • Federal Act on the exercise of exclusive television broadcasting rights 2001 [Fernseh-Exclusivrechtegesetz], Austrian Federal Law Gazette I No 85/2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordinance on events of substantial social interest [Verordnung der Bundesregierung über Ereignisse von erheblicher gesellschaftlicher Bedeutung], Austrian Federal Law Gazette II No 305/2001

    Google Scholar 

Belgium Legislation

  • Order of the Flemish Government of 28 May 2004 establishing the list of events of major importance to society [Besluit houdende vaststelling van de lijst van evenementen van aanzienlijk belang voor de samenleving], Belgian State Gazette, 19 August 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Order of 8 June 2004 designating events of major importance and determining the procedures for making them accessible, Belgian State Gazette 6 Sept 2004 [Arrêté désignant les événements d’intérêt majeur et fixant les modalités de leur accès]

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlaams Parlement (2008) Explanatory Memorandum [Memorie van Toelichting—Ontwerp van Decreet betreffende de radio-omroep en televisie], 19 Dec 2008, 2014/1. http://docs.vlaamsparlement.be/docs/stukken/2008-2009/g2014-1.pdf. Accessed 21 August 2010

  • French Community Media Decree of 27 February 2003, Belgian State Gazette 17 April 2003 [Décret sur la radiodiffusion], last amended and renamed by the French Community Decree of 5 Febr 2009 into “French Community Audiovisual Media Services Act”; coordinated by the Decree of 26 March 2009, Belgian State Gazette 27 July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemish Community Media Decree of 27 March 2009 [Decreet betreffende radio—omroep en televisie], Belgian State Gazette, 30 April 2009, modified by the Decree of 24 July 2009, Belgian State Gazette, 16 Sept 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlaamse Regering (2011a) Explanatory Memorandum of a draft proposal amending Flemish Media Decree of 27 March 2009 [Memorie van Toelichting—Voorontwerp van decreet houdende wijziging van diverse bepalingen van het decreet van 27 maart 2009 betreffende radio-omroep en televisie]

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlaamse Regering (2011b). Draft proposal amending Flemish Media Decree of 27 March 2009 [Voorontwerp van decreet houdende wijziging van diverse bepalingen van het decreet van 27 maart 2009 betreffende radio-omroep en televisie]

    Google Scholar 

Miscellaneous

Denmark Legislation

  • Order No 138 of 19 February 1998 [Bekendtgørelse om udnyttelse af tv-rettigheder til begivenheder af væsentlig samfundsmæssig interesse]. OJ (1999) C 14/6

    Google Scholar 

  • Revocation of the Danish Order on the use of TV rights to events of major importance to society. OJ (2002) C 45/7

    Google Scholar 

France Legislation

  • Decree No 2004-1392 of 22 December 2004 applying Article 20-2 of Law No 86-1067 of 30 September 1986 on the freedom of communication [Décret no 2004-1392 du 22 décembre 2004 pris pour l’application de l’article 20-2 de la loi no 86-1067 du 30 septembre 1986 relative à la liberté de communication], French Official Gazette, 24 Dec 2004

    Google Scholar 

Germany Legislation

  • Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting of 31 August 1991, last amended by the Twelfth Interstate Treaty for Amending the Interstate Treaties of 18 December 2008 [Rundfunkstaatsvertrag], German Federal Law Gazette, 27 March 2008

    Google Scholar 

Ireland Legislation

Italy Legislation

  • Decision No 8/1999 of 9 March 1999 [Delibera n. 8/99 modificata dalla delibera n. 172/1999], Official Gazette No 119 of 24 May 1999, as amended by Decision No 172/1999 of 28 July 1999, Italian Official Gazette No 192 of 17 August 1999

    Google Scholar 

Poland Legislation

  • Broadcasting Act of 29 December 1992 [Ustawa o Radiofonii i Telewizji]. Pol Off J 1993, No 7, item 34, 1993, as amended

    Google Scholar 

The Netherlands Legislation

  • Media Act of 29 December 2008 [Wet van 29 december 2008 tot vaststelling van een nieuwe Mediawet], State Gazette of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 2008/583

    Google Scholar 

  • Media Decree of 29 December 2008 [Besluit van 29 december 2008 houdende vaststelling van een nieuw Mediabesluit], State Gazette of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 2008-585

    Google Scholar 

UK Legislation

Consultations

Reports

Miscallanious

  • DCMS, coverage of sport on television. http://www.culture.gov.uk/PDF/sport_on_television.pdf. Accessed 20 August 2010

  • Ministry for Culture, Media and Sports (1997) Communication—notes for guidance on the listing of major sports events, included in Commission Decision of 16 October 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities. OJ (2007) L 295/12

    Google Scholar 

Others

Case law Court of Justice

  • CJ, Procureur du Roi v Marc J.V.C. Debauve, 18 March 1980, Case 52/79, ECR (1980) I-833

    Google Scholar 

  • CJ, Elliniki Radiophonia Tiléorassi AE and Panellinia Omospondia Syllogon Prossopikou v Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis and Sotirios Kouvelas and Nicolaos Avdellas and others, 18 June 1991, Case C-260/89, ECR (1991) I-2925

    Google Scholar 

  • CJ, Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands, 25 July 1991, Case C-353/89, ECR (1991) I-4069

    Google Scholar 

  • CJ, Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda et al.v Commissariaat voor de Media, 25 July 1991, C-288/89, ECR (1991) I-4007

    Google Scholar 

  • CJ, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Rundfunkanstalten (ARD) v PRO Sieben Media AG, 28 October 1999, Case C-6/98, ECR (1999) I-7599

    Google Scholar 

  • CJ, François De Coster v Collège des bourgmestre et échevins de Watermael-Boitsfort, 29 Novemb 2001, case C–17/00, ECR (2001) I-9445

    Google Scholar 

  • CJ, United Pan-Europe Communications Belgium SA, Coditel Brabant SPRL, Société Intercommunale pour la Diffusion de la Télévision (Brutélé), Wolu TV ASBL v État belge, 13 Dec 2007, Case C-250/06, ECR (2007) I-11135

    Google Scholar 

  • CJ, Commission of the European Communities v Infront WM AG, 13 March 2008, Case C-125/06, ECR I-1457

    Google Scholar 

General Court

  • GC, Infront WM AG v Commission of the European Communities, 15 Dec 2005, Case T-33/01, ECR II-5897

    Google Scholar 

  • GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-385/07, 17 Febr 2011 (not yet published in the ECR)

    Google Scholar 

  • GC, FIFA v European Commission, Case T-68/08, 17 Febr 2011 (not yet published in the ECR)

    Google Scholar 

  • GC, UEFA v European Commission, Case T-55/08, 17 Febr 2011 (not yet published in the ECR)

    Google Scholar 

European Court of Human Rights

  • ECHR, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 Dec 1976, Application no. 5493/72

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHR, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom, 26 April 1979, Application no. 6538/74

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHR, Groppera Radio AG and others v. Switzerland, 28 March 1990, Application no. 10890/84

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHR, Autronic AG v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, Application no. 12726/87

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHR, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway, 20 May 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHR, Perna v. Italy, 6 May 2003, Application no. 48898/99

    Google Scholar 

Belgium

  • Flemish Media Regulator (2011) Willy Herpol vs. BVBA Coditel/Numericable, Decision 2011/007, 21 March 2011

    Google Scholar 

UK

  • R. v. Independent Television Commission, ex parte TV Danmark 1 [2001] 1 WLR 74

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords. R v. ITC, Ex Parte TV Danmark 1 Ltd, judgment of 25 July 2001, [2001] UKHL 42

    Google Scholar 

US

Miscellaneous

  • FIFA v. Commission, 4 Oct 2007, Case T-385/07. OJ (2007) C 315/41

    Google Scholar 

  • UEFA v. Commission, 5 Febr 2008, Case T-55/08. OJ (2008) C 107/28

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Hearing before the General Court on 24 Febr 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • GC (2010a) Reports for the hearing UEFA v. European Commission, Case T-55/08

    Google Scholar 

  • GC (2010b). Reports for the hearing FIFA v. European Commission, Case T-385/07

    Google Scholar 

  • C-201/11 P pending case, UEFA vs. European Commission, 27 April 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • C-204/11 P pending case, FIFA vs. European Commission, 28 April 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • C-205/11 P pending case, FIFA vs. European Commission, 28 April 2011

    Google Scholar 

Doctrine

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrien Lefever .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lefever, K. (2012). ‘List of Major Events’ Mechanism. In: New Media and Sport. ASSER International Sports Law Series. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-873-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships