Why Statehood Now: A Reflection on the ICC’s Impact on Palestine’s Engagement with International Law

  • Michael G. Kearney
Chapter

Abstract

In 1947, a subcommittee of the General Assembly of the United Nations, by a majority of one, voted not to submit a request for an Advisory Opinion to the International Court of Justice. The question under consideration was as follows: ‘Whether the United Nations, or any of its Member States, is competent to enforce or recommend the enforcement of any proposal concerning the constitution and future government of Palestine, in particular, any plan of partition which is contrary to the wishes, or adopted without the consent of, the inhabitants of Palestine.’

Keywords

Civil Society Security Council Rome Statute Advisory Opinion Partition Resolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbas M (2011) The Long Overdue Palestinian State. New York Times, 16 May 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/17/opinion/17abbas.html?_r=2&ref=opinion
  2. Al Haq (2009) Position Paper on Issues Arising from the Palestinian Authority’s Submission of a Declaration to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute. http://www.alhaq.org/etemplate.php?id=494
  3. Ben-Naftali O, Gross A, Michaeli K (2005) Illegal Occupation: Framing the Occupied Palestinian Territory. BJIL 23:551Google Scholar
  4. Boyle F (1990) Creation of the State of Palestine. EJIL 1:301Google Scholar
  5. Crawford J (1990) The Creation of the State of Palestine: Too much Too soon? EJIL 1:307Google Scholar
  6. Crawford J (2006) The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Aspremont J (2011) The International Legal Scholar in Palestine: Hurling Stones Under the Guise of Legal Forms? A talk with Martti Koskenniemi and Mudar Kassis. Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1846867
  8. Darcy S, Reynolds J (2010) An Enduring Occupation: The Status of the Gaza Strip from the Perspective of International Humanitarian Law. JC & SL 15(2):211–243Google Scholar
  9. Diamond E (2010) Before the Abyss: Reshaping International Humanitarian Law to Suit the Ends of Power. ILR 43:414Google Scholar
  10. Dugard J (2009) Take the Case. The New York Times, 22 July 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/23/opinion/23iht-eddugard.html
  11. Dunlap C (2009) Lawfare: A Decisive Element of 21st-Century Conflicts? JFQ 54:35Google Scholar
  12. Elaraby N (1968) Some Legal Implications of the 1947 Partition Resolution and the 1949 Armistice Agreements. LCP 33:97Google Scholar
  13. Eldar A (2010) Diskin to Abbas: Defer UN Vote on Goldstone or Face ‘Second Gaza’, Ha’artez, 17 January 2010. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1143038.html
  14. Goldstone R et al. (2009) Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, A/HRC/12/48. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/specialsession/9/docs/UNFFMGC_Report.PDF
  15. Greenwood C (1992) The Administration of Occupied Territory in International Law. In: Playfair E (ed) International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories: Two Decades of Israeli Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Horowitz A, Ratner L, Weiss P (eds) (2011) The Goldstone Report: The Legacy of the Landmark Investigation of the Gaza Conflict. Nations Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Joint Press Release (2009) The Goldstone Report at the UN General Assembly: States must Ensure Victim’s Rights and not Compromise the Rule of Law. http://www.alhaq.org/etemplate.php?id=486
  18. Kattan V (2009) From Coexistence to Conquest: International Law and the Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict 1891–1949. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kearney M (2011) Lawfare, Legitimacy & Resistance: The Weak and the Law. 16 Palestinian Yearbook of International Law (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  20. Kearney M (2010) Palestine and the International Criminal Court: Asking the Right Question. UCLA HR & ICL 1Google Scholar
  21. Kearney M, Reynolds J (2012) Palestine, Politics, and the International Criminal Court. In: Schabas W (ed) Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives. Ashgate, London (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  22. Lapidoth R, Calvo-Goller N (1992) Les Éléments Constitutives de l’État et la Déclaration du Conseil National Palestinien du 15 Novembre 1988. RGDIP 96:777Google Scholar
  23. Lin T (2008–2009) Boumediene and Lawfare. U Rich L Rev 43:865Google Scholar
  24. Ma’an News (2009) Islamic Jihad: UN Probe into Gaza Factions will not Criminalize them, Ma'an News, 10 October 2009. http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=231204
  25. Ma’an News (2010) Abbas takes Blame for Goldstone Delay, Commission says, Ma'an News, 9 January 2010. http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=253025
  26. McHugo J (2002) Resolution 242: A Legal Reappraisal of the Rightwing Israeli Interpretation of the Withdrawal Phrase with Reference to the Conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. ICLQ 51:851–882Google Scholar
  27. Palestinian Declaration of Independence, Algiers, Algeria, 15 November 1988. http://www.nad-plo.org/userfiles/file/Document/Declaration%20of%20Independence.pdf
  28. Pellet J (2010) The Palestinian Declaration and the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. J Int Crim Justice 8:4Google Scholar
  29. Quigley J (1997) The Israel-PLO Agreements: Are they Treaties? CILJ 30:717Google Scholar
  30. Republic of Côte D’Ivoire (2003) Declaration to the ICC, 1 October 2003, No. 481/ACI/BNL/CE‐2/dd. http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/74EEE201-0FED-4481-95D4-C8071087102C/279843/ICDENG.pdf
  31. Said E (2001) The End of the Peace Process: Oslo and After. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Samara A (2002) Epidemic of Globalization: Ventures in World Order, Arab Nationlism and Zionism. Palestine Research and Publishing Foundation, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw M (2011) The Article 12(3) Declaration of the Palestinian Authority, the International Criminal Court and International Law. JICJ 9(2):301Google Scholar
  34. Steinberg G (2005) The UN, the ICJ, and the Separation Barrier: War by Other Means. ILR 38:331Google Scholar
  35. Strawson J (2010) Partitioning Palestine: Legal Fundamentalism in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. The Palestinian National Charter (1968) Resolutions of the Palestine National Council, 1–17 July 1968. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/plocov.asp
  37. Tilley V (ed) (2009) Occupation, Colonialism, Apartheid? A Re-assessment of Israel’s Practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories Under International Law. Human Sciences Research Council, Cape TownGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael G. Kearney
    • 1
  1. 1.London School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations