Advertisement

Procedural Harmonisation in a European Context

  • Burkhard Hess
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyses the procedural landscape in the European Union, and the extent of harmonisation. The legislative activities of the EU started in the context of international procedural law, for which Article 65 EC Treaty (now Article 81 TFEU) provided the legal basis. The second area of legislative activity of the EU relates to the domestic procedures of the Member States, where a sectoral approach is taken. The principles of effectiveness and equivalence regarding the enforcement of EU law also have an impact on civil procedure, including the new competence to harmonise procedural laws if these do not sufficiently implement substantive EU law, laid down in Article 114 TFEU. Further harmonisation is reached through the minimum requirements laid down in specific instruments, such as the European Enforcement Order Regulation. It is clear that the legislative approach in international civil procedural law has changed during the last decade, from the coordination of national procedures and improved traditional instruments of private international law, to connecting the procedural systems of the Member States and to overcoming obstacles to the free movement of judgments. Furthermore, there is a trend towards the constitutionalisation of European civil procedure. In the present period of transition, it is high time for procedural scholarship to start a broad discussion within academia on the future architecture of European procedural law.

Keywords

National Court Civil Procedure Brussels Convention Judicial Cooperation Collective Redress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andrae M (2010) Zum Beitritt der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zum Haager Protokoll über das Unterhaltsrecht, Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht (GPR), pp 196–205Google Scholar
  2. Crifò C (2009) Cross-border enforcement of debts in the European Union. Kluwer Law International, London/Alphen a/d RijnGoogle Scholar
  3. Fredriksen H (2009) Europäische Vorlageverfahren und nationales Zivilprozessrecht. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), TübingenGoogle Scholar
  4. Grabitz E (ed) (2011) Commentary on Article 81 TFEU. C. H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  5. Hess B (1998) Der Binnenmarktprozess, JuristenZeitung, pp 1021–1032Google Scholar
  6. Hess B (2008) EU trends in access to justice. In: Van Rhee CH, Uzelac A (eds) Civil justice between efficiency and quality: from Ius commune to the CEPEJ. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 189–206Google Scholar
  7. Hess B (2010a) Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht. C.F Müller, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. Hess B (2010b) Kartellrechtliche Kollektivklagen in der Europäischen Union—Aktuelle Perspektiven. Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WuW) 5:493–501Google Scholar
  9. Hess B (2011) Die Reform der EuGVVO und die Zukunft des Europäischen Zivilprozessrechts, Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax), pp 125–130Google Scholar
  10. Hess B et al (eds) (2008) The regulation Brussels I—report on its application in 25 member states, institute fur Auslandisches und Internationales Privat- und Wirtschaftsrecht, Study JLS/C4/2005/03. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/study_application_brussels_1_en.pdf (accessed in May 2011)
  11. Hess B et al (eds) (2009) Report on the application of regulation Brussels I in the member states, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/whatsnew_en.htm (accessed May 2011)
  12. Jauernig O, Hess B (2011) Zivilprozessrecht. C.H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  13. Kerameus D (2002) Angleichung des Zivilprozessrechts in Europa—einige grundlegende Aspekte. Rabels Zeitschrift 66:1–17Google Scholar
  14. Lein E (2009) A further step towards a European code of private international law. Yearb Priv Int Law 11:107–141Google Scholar
  15. Mansel HP (ed) (2008) Zugang zum Recht: Europäische und US-amerikanische Wege der privaten Rechtsdurchsetzung. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  16. MPI Working Group (2010) Max Planck institute for comparative and international private law, comments on the European commission’s proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and authentic instruments in matters of succession and the creation of a European certificate of succession, Rabels Zeitschrift, pp 522–720Google Scholar
  17. Paulino Perreira F (2010) La coopération en matière civile dans l’UE: bilan et perspectives, Revue Critique de Droit International Privé, pp 3–36Google Scholar
  18. Prechal A (2005) Directives in EU Law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Schack H (1999) Die EU-Kommission auf dem Holzweg von Amsterdam, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, pp 805–808Google Scholar
  20. Storme M (ed) (1994) Rapprochement du Droit Judiciaire de L’Union européenne Approximation of Judiciary Law in the European Union. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Storme M (2009) Current issues of European civil procedure—which way for Europe, paper presented at Budapest 4.12.2009Google Scholar
  22. Storskrubb E (2008) Civil procedure and EU law, a policy area uncovered. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tulibacka M (2009) Europeanization of civil procedure: in search of a coherent approach. Common Market Law Rev 46:1527–1566Google Scholar
  24. Wagner R (1998) Die geplante Reform des Brüsseler und des Lugano- Übereinkommen, Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax), pp 241–244Google Scholar
  25. Ward A (2007) Judicial review and the rights of private parties in the European union. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiedmann T, Gebauer M (2011) Zivilrecht und Europäische Integration. In: Gebauer T, Wiedmann M (eds) Zivilrecht unter europäischem Einfluss. C.H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  27. Würdinger M (2011) Das Prinzip der Einheit der Schuldrechtsverordnungen im Europäischen Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrecht. Rabels Zeitschrift 75:102–126Google Scholar
  28. Zimmer D, Logemann H (2009) Der private Rechtsschutz im Kartellrecht—Zum Weißbuch der Kommission über Schadensersatzklagen wegen Verletzung des EG-Wettbewerbsrechts, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, pp 489–516Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors/editors  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Private International Law and Comparative LawUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations