Harmonisation of Civil Procedure and the Interaction with Substantive Private Law

  • Matthias E. StormeEmail author


This chapter deals with the interaction between procedural law and substantive private law in the context of a partially harmonised but mainly non harmonised substantive law. It also discusses civil proceedings dealing with matters not exclusively governed by domestic law. Procedural law should take into account that the applicable private law is often drafted or developed having regard to different rules of procedure (foreign private law) or without taking into consideration the existing rules of civil procedure. The author illustrates more specifically the possible problems with regard to (1) procedural rules concerning the availability of and access to procedures and the powers of courts, (2) the protection of defendants and (3) a change of parties or their rights under substantive law during the course of the proceedings.


Procedural Rule Civil Procedure Insolvency Proceeding Arbitration Clause Arbitration Proceeding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ancery AGF, Wissink MH (2010) ECJ 4 June 2009, Pannon GSM Zrt. v. Erzsébet Sustikné Győrfi. Euro Rev Priv Law 18:307–316Google Scholar
  2. Darbellay J (1964) Le droit d’être entendu, 98. Referate und Mitteilungen des schweizerischen Juristenvereins, Helbing und Lichtenhahn, BaselGoogle Scholar
  3. Degenkolb H (1877) Einlassungszwang und Urteilsnorm, Beiträge zur materiellen Theorie der Klagen, insbesondere der Anerkennungsklagen. Breitkopf and Hartel, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  4. Ebers M (2010) From Océano to Asturcom: Mandatory Consumer Law, Ex Officio Application of European Union Law and Res Judicata. Eur Rev Priv Law 4:823–846Google Scholar
  5. Hohfeld H (1913/1917) Fundamental legal conceptions, Yale Law Journal 1913 and 1917, reprinted in Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning and other legal essays by W N Hohfeld, Yale UP New Haven 1919Google Scholar
  6. Schebesta H (2010) Does the national court know European law? A note on ex officio application after Asturcom. Euro Rev Priv Law 4:847–880Google Scholar
  7. Storme ME (1994) Rechtsopvolging onder bijzondere titel tijdens het burgerlijk geding in België en Nederland, Rechtskundig Weekblad (RW) 1993–94, 169–186. Available at (accessed July 2011)
  8. Storme M E (1995) De Lebbeekse uitweg uit een processuele valstrik: ten processe optreden in een andere hoedanigheid en optreden krachtens een ander recht, Proces & Bewijs 1995, 43–44. Available at (accessed July 2011)

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors/editors  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KU LeuvenBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations