Advertisement

The Dutch Choice of Law Rules on the Termination of Registered Partnerships

  • N. A. Baarsma
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter deals with the Dutch choice of law rules on the termination of registered partnerships. Despite some activity in this field, to date there is no international treaty providing for a regulation of the private international law aspects of registered partnerships. It is not very probable that an international treaty will be drawn up in the near future. The number of states that recognise the possibility of cohabitation outside marriage or of a registered partnership is too small. Although the number of countries introducing the institution of registered partnership increases, the large diversity of national regulations in this field will make it very hard to reach consensus on the international level. The Dutch Choice of Law Act on Registered Partnerships (Wet conflictenrecht geregistreerd partnerschap) provides for the choice of law on registered partnerships. Since Dutch law places registered partnerships as much as possible on an equal footing with marriage, the choice of law rules regarding the termination of registered partnerships sought connection to the choice of law rules on divorce. The choice of law on the termination of registered partnerships is based on the principle of favor dissolutionis, which implies that they aim to favour the possibility to terminate a registered partnership in an international case. The choice of law on the termination of registered partnerships has been divided in two categories: the registered partnerships entered into in the Netherlands (Article 22) and those entered into outside the Netherlands (Article 23). Article 23 CLARP makes a further distinction between termination by mutual consent and dissolution by the court. This structure can be traced back to Dutch procedural law. The Dutch legislator has created a two-track system for the termination of registered partnerships: the administrative procedure on the one hand and the judicial procedure on the other. The principal rule regarding the applicable law to the termination of a registered partnership is that Dutch law will apply in all cases unless the partners have chosen the application of the lex loci celebrationis. The general transitional provision of the Choice of Law Act on Registered Partnerships works out rather unfortunate with respect to the termination of registered partnerships. According to Article 29 of the CLARP do the rules provided for by the CLARP not apply to registered partnerships concluded prior to the date of its entry into force. This means that the termination of registered partnerships is only governed by the CLARP if the partnership has been entered into on or after 1 January 2005. Unfortunately the Dutch legislature has not amended this transitional provision in the Dutch Proposal on Private International Law.

Keywords

Habitual Residence Mutual Consent Registered Partnership Explanatory Memorandum Supra Sect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

Regulations, Conventions, Reports and Other Documentary Sources

  1. Choice of Law Act on Registered Partnerships. Act of 6 July 2004, Stb. 2004, Nos. 334 and 621, containing a regulation of the choice of law with regard to the registered partnership, Wet Conflictenrecht Geregistreerd Partnerschap Google Scholar
  2. Dutch Proposal on Private International Law. Vaststelling en invoering van Boek 10 (Internationaal privaatrecht) van het Burgerlijk Wetboek, Kamerstukken II 2009–2010, 32 137, No. 2Google Scholar
  3. Staatscommissie (1998). Staatscommissie voor het Internationaal Privaatrecht, Geregistreerd partnerschap, Report of 1 May 1998, available at: http://www.justitie.nl/onderwerpen/wetgeving/over_wetgeving/privaat-recht/commissies-privaatrecht/staatscommissie-ipr.aspx

Books and Articles

  1. Boele-Woelki K (1999) De wenselijkheid van een IPR-verdrag inzake samenleving buiten huwelijk. FJR 21:11–13Google Scholar
  2. Boele-Woelki K (2000) Private international law aspects of registered partnerships and other forms of non-marital cohabitation in Europe. Louisiana Law Review 60:1053–1059Google Scholar
  3. Boele-Woelki K (2003) Internationaal privaatrecht wet(svoorstel) Conflictenrecht Geregistreerd Partnerschap. Ars Aequi 52:4848–4849Google Scholar
  4. Boele-Woelki K, Curry-Sumner I, Jansen M, Schrama W (2007) Huwelijk of geregistreerd partnerschap? Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  5. Curry-Sumner I (2005) All’s well that ends registered? Intersentia, AntwerpenGoogle Scholar
  6. Curry-Sumner I (2008) European recognition of same-sex relationships: we need action now! IFL 12:102–109Google Scholar
  7. De Groot G-R (2007) Private international law aspects relating to homosexual couples. In: Boele-Woelki I, Van Erp S (eds) General reports of the XVIIth congress of the international academy of comparative law. Bruylant, Brussel, pp 325–356Google Scholar
  8. Duncan W (1999) Civil law aspects of emerging forms of registered partnerships. private international law issues, presentation fifth European conference on family law 15–16 March 1999Google Scholar
  9. Frohn EN (2004) De wet conflictenrecht geregistreerd partnerschap. FJR 123:290–294Google Scholar
  10. Goldstein G (2006) La cohabitation hors mariage en droit international privé. Recueil des Cours 320:9–390Google Scholar
  11. Hausmann R (2000) Überlegungen zum Kollisionsrecht registrierter Partnerschaften. In: Gottwald P et al (eds) Festschrift für Dieter Henrich. Verlag Ernst und Werner Gieseking, Bielefeld, pp 241–265Google Scholar
  12. Jessurun d’Oliveira HU (1999) Het geregistreerd partnerschap, het ‘homohuwelijk’ en het IPR. NJB 74:305–306Google Scholar
  13. Jessurun d’Oliveira HU (2000) Registered partnerships, PACSES and private international law. Some reflections. Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale 36:293–322Google Scholar
  14. Jessurun d’Oliviera HU (2003) Autonome kwalificatie in het internationaal privaatrecht: geregistreerde niet-huwelijkse relaties. In: Boele-Woelki K et al (eds) Het plezier van de rechtsvergelijking. Opstellen over unificatie en harmonisatie van het recht in Europa, aangeboden aan prof.mr. E.H. Hondius. Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  15. Joppe IS (2000) Het geregistreerd partnerschap in het Nederlandse IPR. WPNR 6403:371–375, 6404:391–395Google Scholar
  16. Joppe IS (Groene Serie personen- en Familierecht) Titel 5A, Internationaal privaatrecht. Wet conflictenrecht geregistreerd partnerschap Groene Serie Privaatrecht, Personen- en familierecht (Electronic database Plaza Kluwer Juridisch en Fiscaal, looseleaf)Google Scholar
  17. Knot JG (2008) Internationale boedelafwikkeling Over het toepasselijke recht op de afwikkeling van nalatenschappen (diss. Groningen). Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  18. Mostermans PMM (2006) Echtscheiding, 3rd edn. Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  19. Reinhartz BE (2004) Het wetsvoorstel Wet conflictenrecht geregistreerd partnerschap. WPNR 6583:491–498Google Scholar
  20. Šarčević P (1981) Cohabitation without marriage: the Yugoslavian experience. The American Journal of Comparative Law 29:315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Šarčević P (1999) Private international law aspects of legally regulated forms of non-marital cohabitation and registered partnerships. Yearbook of Private International Law 1:37–48Google Scholar
  22. Schrama W (1999) Niet-huwelijkse leefvormen en het IPR. FJR 21:131–133Google Scholar
  23. Strikwerda L (2008) Inleiding tot het Nederlandse Internationaal Privaatrecht, 9th edn. Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  24. Sumner I, Warendorf H (2003) Family law legislation of the Netherlands. Intersentia, AntwerpenGoogle Scholar
  25. Sumner I (2004a) Happy ever after? The problems of terminating registered partnerships. In: Digoix M, Festy P (eds) Same-sex couples, same-sex partnerships, and homosexual marriages: a focus on cross-national differentials. Documents de travail no 124. INED, Paris, pp 35–46Google Scholar
  26. Sumner I (2004b) Dissolution of registered partnerships: excursion in conversion. IFL, pp 231–237Google Scholar
  27. Ten Wolde MH (2001) De uitgangspunten van het Voorstel voor een aantal IPR-bepalingen over het geregistreerd partnerschap nader beschouwd. EchtscheidingsBull, pp 141–143Google Scholar
  28. Ten Wolde MH (2009) Inleiding Nederlands en Europees Internationaal Privaatrecht, Deel A Algemeen deel en materieel IPR Personen-, familie- en erfrecht. Hephaestus, GroningenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C.ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. Baarsma

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations