Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Privacy 3.0

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Innovating Government

Part of the book series: Information Technology and Law Series ((ITLS,volume 20))

Abstract

Dead or as good as dead.’ Not so long ago articles and essays on privacy often started with a statement like this one. Unfortunately, those announcing the end of privacy often did not indicate what exactly was going on. Is our privacy indeed coming to an end? Can we no longer hide things from the eyes of our all-seeing neighbors, companies, and public bodies? Or perhaps nobody, including pro-privacy advocates, is really convinced of the value of privacy? As far as the recognition of the importance of privacy is concerned, there seems to be no justification for pessimism. In spite of the prognosed lack of vitality, privacy presently leads a remarkably lively existence in newspaper opinion columns and in public debate.

Contribution received in 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The sources of this kind of interpretation can be found in: Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965); Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967); Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 367 (1973).

References

  • Albrecht HJ, Dorsch C, Krüpe C (2003) Rechtswirklichkeit und Effizienz der Überwachung der Telekommunikation. Freiburg, Max-Planck-Institut. http://www.iuscrim.mpg.de/verlag/online/Band_115.pdf

  • Allen AL (1988) Uneasy access: privacy for women in a free society. Rowan & Littlefield, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubel CP (1968) Persoon en Pers (diss. Nijmegen KUN). Deventer, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth A et al (2006) Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on security and privacy, May 2006 (Showcased in ‘The Logic of Privacy’ The Economist, 4 January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn SI (1988) A theory of freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blok PH (2002) Het recht op privacy. De betekenis van het begrip ‘privacy’ in het Nederlandse en Amerikaanse recht (diss. Tilburg). Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloustein EJ (1964) Privacy as an aspect of human dignity. An answer to dean Prosser. New York University Law Review, pp 962–1007. Also in: Schoeman FD (ed) (1984) Philosophical dimensions of privacy: an anthology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 156–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer A de et al (2009) Gewoon Doen, beschermen van veiligheid en persoonlijke levenssfeer. Ministry of Interior Affairs, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin P (1965) The Enforcement of Morals (1st edn. 1959). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A (1999) The limits of privacy. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1975) Surveiller et punir, naissance de la prison. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried C (1968) Privacy. Yale Law J 77:475–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie WB (1955–1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian society, pp 167–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein RS (1978) Intimacy and privacy. Ethics, pp 76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwirth S (1998) Privacyvrijheid! De vrijheid om zichzelf te zijn. Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1963) Law, liberty and morality. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin L (1974) Privacy and autonomy. Columbia Law Rev 74:1410–1433

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes R (1995) Privacy: philosophical foundations and moral dilemma’s. In: Ippel P (ed) Privacy disputed. SDU Uitgeverij, Den Haag, pp 15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Inness J (1992) Privacy, intimacy and isolation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JL (1989a) Privacy and the judgements of others. J Value Inq 23:157–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JL (1989b) Privacy, liberty and integrity. Public Aff Q 3:15–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D (1994) Computers and privacy. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JL (2001) Immunity from the illegitimate focused attention of others: an explanation of our thinking and talking about privacy. In: Vedder A (ed) Ethics and the internet. Antwerpen, Intersentia

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffijberg J et al (2009) Niets te verbergen en toch bang. Nederlandse burgers over het gebruik van hun gegevens in de glazen samenleving. Den Haag/Amsterdam, College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens/Regioplan

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops BJ, Vedder A (2001) Opsporing versus privacy: de beleving van burgers. SDU Uitgeverij, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (1994) The electronic eye, the rise of the surveillance society. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1974) On liberty (1st edn. 1859). Pelican Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore B (1984) Privacy: studies in social and cultural history. M.E. Sharpe Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller ER, Kummeling HRBM, Bron RP (2007) Veiligheid en privacy, Een zoektocht naar een nieuwe balans. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum H (1998) Protecting privacy in an information age: the problem of privacy in public. Law Contemp Probl 17:559–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent WA (1983) Recent work on the concept of privacy. Am Philos Q 20(4):341–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri 6 (1998) The future of privacy. Demos, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers M (1996) A cognitive access definition of privacy. Law Philos 15:369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Projectgroep Forensische Opsporing Raad van Hoofdcommissarissen (2004) Spelverdeler in de opsporing. Een visie op forensische opsporin (z.p.). http://www.politie.nl/Overige/Images/33_144778.pdf

  • Prosser WL (1960) Privacy. Calif Law Rev 48:338–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels J (1975) Why privacy is important. Philosophy and public affairs, pp 323–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels J (1975) Why privacy is important. In: Schoeman FD (ed) (1984) Philosophical dimensions of privacy: an anthology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 290–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler B (2001) Der wert des privaten. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule J (1980) The politics of privacy: planning for personal data systems as powerful technologies. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildmeijer R, Samson C, Koot H (2005) Burgers en hun privacy, Opinie onder burgers. Amsterdam, TNS/NIPO

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeman FD (1984) Philosophical dimensions of the literature. In: Schoeman FD (ed) Philosophical dimensions of privacy: an anthology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–33

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeman FD (1992) Privacy and social freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein P, Shand J (1974) Legal values in western society. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeuw WB, Vedder AH (eds) (2008) Security applications for converging technologies, Impact on the constitutional state and the legal order. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ (1975a) The right to privacy. philosophy and public affairs, pp 295–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ (1975b) The right to privacy. In: Schoeman FD (ed) (1984) Philosophical dimensions of privacy: an anthology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 272–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A (1996) Privacy en woorden die tekort schieten. In: Nouwt J, Voermans W (eds) Privacy in het informatietijdperk. SDU Uitgeverij, Den Haag, pp 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A (1997) Privatization, information technology and privacy: reconsidering the social responsibilities of private organizations. In: Moore G (ed) Business ethics: principles and practice. Business Education Publishers Ltd, Sunderland, pp 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A (1998) Het einde van de individualiteit? Groepsprofilering, datamining en de vermeerdering van brute pech en dom geluk. Privacy en Informatie 1(3):115–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A (2000) Medical data, new information technologies and the need for normative principles other than privacy rules. In: Freeman and Lewis (ed) Law and medicine (Series Current Legal Issues) Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 441–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A (2006) Niets meer te verbergen en toch nog bang. Filosofie en Praktijk 27(5):47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A (2008a) Convergerende technologieën, verschuivende verantwoordelijkheden. Justitiële Verkenningen 34(1):54–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A (2008b) De oudere en de paradoxale gevolgen van nieuwe technologieën. In: Berg M Van den, Prins JEJ and Ham M (ed) In de greep van de technologie—Nieuwe toepassingen en het gedrag van de burger. Van Gennep, Amsterdam, pp 135–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhue D (2007) Nationaal Vrijheidsonderzoek—opiniedeel. Meting 2007. Amsterdam, Veldkamp/Comité 4 and 5 May 2007. http://www.4en5mei.nl/mmbase/attachments/110429/2007.04.284_Veldkamp_Marktonderzoek_BV_Nationaal_Vrijheidsonderzoek_2007_opinie

  • Warren SD, Brandeis LD (1890) The right to privacy. The implicit made explicit. Harv Law Rev, pp 193–220. Also in: Schoeman FD (ed) (1984) Philosophical dimensions of privacy: an anthology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein WL (1971) The private and the free: a conceptual inquiry. In: Pennock JR, Chapman JW (eds) Nomos XIII: privacy. Atherton Press, New York, pp 88–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin A (1967) Privacy and freedom. The Bodley Head, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter HB et al (2008) Wat niet weet, wat niet deert. Een evaluatieonderzoek naar de werking van de wet bescherming persoonsgegevens in de praktijk. WODC/Ministerie van Justitie, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TILT – Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Anton Vedder

Authors
  1. Anton Vedder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Vedder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Tilburg Institute for Law Technology and, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, Tilburg, 5037 AB, Netherlands

    Simone van der Hof

  2. , Faculty of Law, Department of Public Law, Leiden University, Faculty of Law, Depar, Kamerlingh Onnes Gebouw, Steenschuur 25, Leiden, 2311 ES, Netherlands

    Marga M. Groothuis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2011

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vedder, A. (2011). Privacy 3.0. In: van der Hof, S., Groothuis, M. (eds) Innovating Government. Information Technology and Law Series, vol 20. T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation