Advertisement

The Treaty Provisions on Competition and Health Care

  • Johan W. van de Gronden
Chapter
Part of the Legal Issues of Services of General Interest book series (LEGAL)

Abstract

A couple of years ago the Dutch Ministry of Health Care organised an international workshop on competition law in health care. At the end of this workshop, one of the speakers, a specialist in health care issues, compared competition law with a ‘fat cat’. The health care sector has had a difficult time in welcoming competition law because the ‘fat cat’ seemed to be mainly interested in competition issues and not in the special features of health care. But after a certain elapse of time the sector has developed some skills to cope with the presence of this cat and has even managed to like it from time to time, as this ‘fat cat’ is capable of enhancing efficiency.

Keywords

Advocate General Competition Rule Parallel Trade European Competition Treaty Provision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appeldoorn JF, Vedder HHB (2010) Mededingingsrecht. Beginselen van Europees en Nederlands Mededingingsrecht [Competition Law. Principles of European and Dutch Competition Law]. Europa Law Publishing, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  2. Belhay S, van de Gronden JW (2004) Some room for competition does not make a sickness fund an undertaking. Is EC competition law applicable to the health care sector? (ECJ Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-453/01 and C-355/01 AOK)’, Europ Compet Law Rev Google Scholar
  3. Buendia Sierra JL (2007) Article 86 (2): Services of general interest and other public interest objectives. In: Faull J, Nikpay A (eds) The EC Law of Competition, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawes A (2006) Neither head nor tail: the confused application of ec competition law to the pharmaceutical sector. Europ Compet Law RevGoogle Scholar
  5. Eccles R (2007) The CFI judgement in GlaxoSmithKline. Eur Compet Law Rev 28(2)Google Scholar
  6. Faull J, Nikpay A (2007) The EC Law of Competition, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton GJ (2005) A new private universal health insurance in the Netherlands. In: den Exter A (ed) Competitive I 2004, Erasmus University Press, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Hervey TK, McHale JV (2004) Health law and the European union. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Houdijk JCA (2009) Publieke belangen in het mededingingsrecht: een onderzoek in vijf domeinen (public interests in competition law. A study in five areas) Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  10. Hovenkamp H (2005) The antitrust enterprise. Principle and execution Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones A, Sufrin B (2008) EC competition law 3rd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Lovdahl Gormsen L (2010) why the European commission’s enforcement priorities on article 82 EC should be withdrawn. Eur Compet Law Rev Google Scholar
  13. Monti G (2002) Article 81 EC and public policy. CMLRevGoogle Scholar
  14. Neergaard U (2009) Services of general (economic) interest: what aims and values count? In: Neergaard U, Nielsen R, Roseberry LM (eds) I DJØF Publishing, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  15. Odudu O (2006) The boundaries of EC competition law. The Scope of Article 81 Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Pautke S (2005) Competition law limitations for the distribution of pharmaceuticals—rough guide to the brave new world. Eur Compet Law RevGoogle Scholar
  17. Rey P, Venit JS (2004) Parallel trade and pharmaceuticals: a policy in search of itself. Eur Compet Law RevGoogle Scholar
  18. Sauter W (2008) Services of general economic interest and universal services in EU law. Europ Law RevGoogle Scholar
  19. Townley C (2009) Article 81 EC and Public Policy. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Turner-Kerr P (2009) Finally a bit of clarity for pharmaceutical companies: but uncertainties remain: judgement of the ECJ in Sot.Lelos Kai Sia EE v GlaxoSmithKline AEVE. Europ Compet Law RevGoogle Scholar
  21. Van de Gronden JW (2006) The internal market, the state and private initiative. A legal assessment of national mixed public–private arrangements in the light of european law. Legal Issues Econ IntegrationGoogle Scholar
  22. Van de Gronden JW (2008) Cross-border health care in the EU and the organization of the national health care systems of the member states: The dynamics resulting from the European court of justice’s decisions on free movement and competition law. Wisconsin Int Law J Google Scholar
  23. Vedder HHB (2004) Spontaneous harmonisation of national (competition) laws in the wake of the modernisation of EC competition law. Compet Law RevGoogle Scholar
  24. Whish R (2009) Competition Law. 6th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C.ASSER PRESS and the author 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawRadbouw UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations