Advertisement

Urgent Biophilia: Human-Nature Interactions in Red Zone Recovery and Resilience

  • Keith G. Tidball
Chapter

Abstract

This contribution builds upon earlier work on the concept of biophilia while synthesizing literatures on restorative environments, community-based ecological restoration, and both community and social-ecological disaster resilience. It suggests that when humans, faced with a disaster, as individuals and as communities and populations, seek engagement with nature to further their efforts to summon and demonstrate resilience in the face of a crisis, they exemplify an urgent biophilia. This urgent biophilia represents an important set of human-nature interactions in social-ecological systems characterized by hazard, disaster, or vulnerability, often appearing in the ‘backloop’ of the adaptive cycle. The relationships that human-nature interactions have to other components within interdependent systems at many different scales may be one critical source of resilience in disaster and related contexts. In other words, the affinity we humans have for the rest of nature, the process of remembering that attraction, and the urge to express it through creation of restorative environments, which may also restore or increase ecological function, may confer resilience across multiple scales.

Keywords

Urgent biophilia Restorative environments Human-nature interactions Disaster resilience Vulnerability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Marianne Krasny for many critical discussions about biophilia and its explanatory utility in community greening in a general sense, as well as for multiple helpful reviews of earlier versions of this chapter. I also acknowledge the useful conversations and insightful perspectives contributed by James Tantillo and Richard Stedman on biophilia and the debates around sociobiology. I wish to express my gratitude to Lance Gunderson for his thorough and insightful review of this chapter and to Stephen Kellert for his elaboration of the biophilia hypothesis and for his invaluable review of this chapter. I am grateful to those who provided helpful feedback when this chapter was presented at the Resilience 2011 conference in Tempe, AZ. I thank all of the above-mentioned, and acknowledge that any errors of omission or commission in this chapter are only my own. Finally, though I have yet to meet him, I am indebted to E. O. Wilson for his original and courageous conceptualization of biophilia.

References

  1. Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., et al. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309(5737), 1036–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, E., Beckwith, J., et al. (1975). Against “sociobiology” letter. The New York Review of Books, 182, 184–186.Google Scholar
  3. Almusaed, A. (2010). Biophilic and bioclimatic architecture: Analytical therapy for the next generation of passive sustainable architecture. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, M. E., & Kaplan, R. (2003). Identity, involvement, and expertise in the inner city: Some benefits of tree-planting projects. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 205–225). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barthel, S., Colding, J., et al. (2005). History and local management of a biodiversity-rich, urban cultural landscape. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 10.Google Scholar
  6. Beatley, T. (2010). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, S., Hamilton, V., et al. (2008). Greenspace and quality of life: A critical literature review. Stirling: Greenspace Scotland.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, R., & McLeod, I. (2006). Incorporating nature into therapy: A framework for practice. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 25(2), 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkes, F., Colding, J., et al. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Betrabet, G. (1996). The garden as a restorative environment: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 8, 15–20.Google Scholar
  12. Born, R., Lenders, R., et al. (2001). The new biophilia: An exploration of visions of nature in Western countries. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brdanovic, D. (2009). Gardens for peace and reconciliation. In L. Campbell & A. Wiesen (Eds.), Restorative commons: Creating health and well-being through urban landscapes. Newtown Square: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  14. Brett, S., Bickford, L., et al. (2007). Memorialization and democracy: State policy and civic action. Santiago: Latin American School of Social Sciences, International Center for Transitional Justice, International Coalition of Historic Site Museums of Conscience, p. 44.Google Scholar
  15. Butterfield, B., & Relf, D. (1992). National survey of attitudes toward plants and gardening. In D. Relf (Ed.), The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development: A national symposium, 19–21 April 1990, Arlington, Virginia (pp. 211–212). Portland: Timber Press.Google Scholar
  16. Campbell, L., & Wiesen, A. (Eds.). (2009). Restorative commons: Creating health and well-being through urban landscapes (GTR NRS-P-239). Newtown Square: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, S., & McBride, J. R. (2006). Restoration of the urban forests of Tokyo and Hiroshima following World War II. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 5(4), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cimprich, B. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper Marcus, C., & Barnes, M. (1999). Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Daniels, R., Kettl, D., et al. (Eds.). (2006). On risk and disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  21. Davidson-Hunt, I., & Berkes, F. (2003). Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of social-ecological environments and adaptive learning. Conservation Ecology, 8(1), 5.Google Scholar
  22. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  23. Donovan, G., Michael, Y., et al. (2011). Urban trees and the risk of poor birth outcomes. Health & Place, 17, 390–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Downing, A. J. (1869). A talk about public parks and gardens. In A. J. Downing & G. W. Curtis (Eds.), Rural essays (pp. 138–146). New York: George A Leavitt.Google Scholar
  25. Drennan, M. P. (2007). The economic cost of disasters—Permanent or ephemeral? In P. Gordon & H. Richardson (Eds.), Economic costs and consequences of terrorism (pp. 159–191). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Driver, B. L., & Knopf, R. C. (1976). Temporary escape: One product of sport fisheries management. Fisheries, 1, 24–29.Google Scholar
  27. Dunlap, R. E. (1980). From human exemptions to an ecological paradigm. The American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elings, M. (2006). People–plant interaction: The physiological, psychological and sociological effects of plants on people. In J. Hassink & M. v. Dijk (Eds.), Farming for health: Green-care farming across Europe and the United States of America (pp. 43–55). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Ernstson, H., Sörlin, S., et al. (2008). Social movements and ecosystem services–The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 39.Google Scholar
  31. Faber Taylor, A., Wiley, A., et al. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., et al. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. In The world summit on sustainable development. Paris: ICSU.Google Scholar
  33. Fox, S. (1981). John Muir and his legacy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  34. Fredrickson, B., Tugade, M., et al. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fromm, E. (1964). The heart of man. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  36. Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Graff, B. (2006). Positive emotions in residential environments-part of a workshop entitled The residential context of health at the European network for housing research housing in an expanding Europe: Theory, policy participation and implementation conference. Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  38. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gullone, E. (2000). The biophilia hypothesis and life in the 21st century: Increasing mental health or increasing pathology? Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(3), 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hartig, T. (2007). Toward understanding the restorative environment as a health resource. In Open space: People space 2 conference. Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  42. Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction: Restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hartig, T., Mang, M., et al. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haviland-Jones, J., Rosario, H., et al. (2005). An environmental approach to positive emotion: Flowers. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 104–132.Google Scholar
  46. Helphand, K. (2006). Defiant gardens: Making gardens in wartime. San Antonio: Trinity University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hewson, M. (2001). Horticultural therapy and post traumatic stress recovery. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 12, 44–47.Google Scholar
  48. Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In L. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hull, R. B. (1992). How the public values urban forests. Journal of Arboriculture, 18(2), 98–101.Google Scholar
  50. IFRC (2004). Focus on community resilience (World Disasters Report). Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies 231.Google Scholar
  51. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. (2007). IASC guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support in emergency settings. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
  52. Kahn, P. H. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children’s affiliation with nature. Developmental Review, 17(1), 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kahn, J. P. H. (1999). The human relationship with nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 163–203). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kellert, S. (1993). Introduction. In S. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  58. Kellert, S. (1997a). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kellert, S. (1997b). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kellert, S., & Wilson, E. (Eds.). (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  62. Kellert, S., Heerwagen, J., et al. (Eds.). (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Ke-Tsung, H. (2001). A review: Theories of restorative environments. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 12, 30–43.Google Scholar
  64. King, A. C., Stokols, D., et al. (2002). Theoretical approaches to the promotion of physical activity: Forging a transdiciplinary paradigm. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kitcher, P. (1987). Vaulting ambition: Sociobiology and the quest for human nature. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  66. Krasny, M. E., & Tidball, K. G. (2010). Civic ecology: Linking social and ecological approaches in extension. Journal of Extension, 48(1).Google Scholar
  67. Krasny, M. E., & Tidball, K. G. (2012). Civic ecology: A pathway for Earth Stewardship in cities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(5), 267–273.Google Scholar
  68. Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33, 343–367.Google Scholar
  69. Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., et al. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kurakin, A. (2007). The universal principles of self-organization and the unity of nature and knowledge. From website: http://www.alexeikurakin.org/text/thesoft.pdf
  71. Kurakin, A. (2009). Scale-free flow of life: On the biology, economics, and physics of the cell. Theoretical Biology & Medical Modelling, 6(6).Google Scholar
  72. Lewis, C. (1996). Green nature/human nature. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  73. Lewis, C. A., & Sturgill, S. (1979). Comment: Healing in the urban environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(3), 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lewontin, R., Rose, S., et al. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology and human nature. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  75. Lohr, V. I., & Pearson-Mims, C. H. (2006). Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded, and conical tree forms. Environment and Behavior, 38(5), 667–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Longstaff, P. H. (2005). Security, resilience, and communication in unpredictable environments such as terrorism, natural disaster, and complex technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Program on Information Resources Policy.Google Scholar
  77. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar
  78. Markee, K. M., & Janick, J. (1979). A bibliography for horticultural therapy (1970–1978): Comparison of literature search techniques in an interdisciplinary field. Horticulture Science, 6, 692–696.Google Scholar
  79. Masten, A. S., & Obradovic, J. (2008). Disaster preparation and recovery: Lessons from research on resilience in human development. Ecology and Society 13(1), 9. Online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss11/art19/
  80. Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., et al. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2(04), 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mazel, D. (2000). American literary environmentalism. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  82. McLuhan, T. (1994). The way of the earth: Encounters with nature in ancient and contemporary thought. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  83. Miavitz, E. M. (1998). Grief gardening. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 9, 17–21.Google Scholar
  84. Miles, I., Sullivan, W., et al. (1998). Ecological restoration volunteers: The benefits of participation. Urban Ecosystems, 2, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Murphy, P., Gifford, T., et al. (1998). Literature of nature: An international sourcebook. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.Google Scholar
  86. Nash, R. (1982). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Olmstead, F. L. (1865/1952). The Yosemite Valley and the Mariposa big trees: A preliminary report: With an introductory note by Laura Wood Roper. Landscape Architecture, 43, 12–25.Google Scholar
  88. Peacock, W., Morrow, B. H., et al. (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities: Natural disasters and social resilience. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  90. People Plant Council. (1993). Annotated bibliography of horticultural therapy. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
  91. Reardon, K. M., Green, R., et al. (2009). Overcoming the challenges of post-disaster planning in New Orleans: Lessons from the ACORN housing/University collaborative. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Relf, D. (2005). The therapeutic values of plants. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 8(3), 235–237.Google Scholar
  93. Relf, P. D. (2006). Agriculture and health care: The care of plants and animals for therapy and rehabilitation in the United States. In J. Hassink & M. v. Dijk (Eds.), Farming for health: Green-care farming across Europe and the United States of America (pp. 309–343). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  94. Relf, D., & Dorn, S. (1995). Horticulture: Meeting the needs of special populations. Horticulture Technology, 2, 94–104.Google Scholar
  95. Ryan, R. L., & Grese, R. E. (2005). Urban volunteers and the environment: Forest and prairie restoration. In P. F. Barlett (Ed.), Urban place: Reconnecting to the natural world (pp. 173–188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  96. Salick, J. (1995). Toward an integration of evolutionary ecology and economic botany: Personal perspectives on plant/people interactions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 82(1), 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sattler, D. N., Freedy, J. F., et al. (1997). Natural disasters and psychological adjustment: Implications of research for intervention efforts. Journal of Psychological Practice, 3, 113–127.Google Scholar
  98. Segerstråle, U. (2000). Defenders of the truth: The battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Sideris, L. H. (2003). Environmental ethics, ecological theology, and natural selection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Soule, M. E. (1993). Biophilia: Unanswered questions. In S. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  101. Sullivan, W. C., & Kuo, F. E. (1996). Do trees strengthen urban communities, reduce domestic violence? Atlanta: USDA Forest Service Southern Region.Google Scholar
  102. Svendsen, E., & Campbell, L. (2005a). Living memorials project: Year 1 social and site assessment (General Tech. Rep. NE-333). Newtown Square: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  103. Tidball, K. G., & Krasny, M. E. (2007). From risk to resilience: What role for community greening and civic ecology in cities? In A. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a more sustainable world (pp. 149–164). Wagengingen: Wagengingen Academic Press.Google Scholar
  104. Tidball, K., & Stedman, R. (2013). Positive dependency and virtuous cycles: From resource dependence to resilience in urban social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics, 86(0), 292–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.004.
  105. Tidball, K. G., Weinstein, E., et al. (2008). Stake-holder asset-based planning environment. Department of Defense and DOD/OSD 2007 STTR Topic 003 Final Technical Report (p. 114). Washington, DC: Jointly published by Logos Technologies, Inc., Cornell University, and International Sustainable Systems.Google Scholar
  106. Tidball, K. G., Krasny, M., et al. (2010). Stewardship, learning, and memory in disaster resilience. Environmental Education Research (Special Issue, Resilience in social-ecological systems: The role of learning and education), 16(5), 341–357.Google Scholar
  107. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Van Den Berg, A. E., Hartig, T., et al. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., et al. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Walker, B. H., & Meyers, J. A. (2004). Thresholds in ecological and social-ecological systems: A developing database. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 3. Online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art3/
  112. Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  113. Walker, B., Carpenter, S., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 14.Google Scholar
  114. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., et al. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.Google Scholar
  115. Weinstein, E., & Tidball, K. G. (2007). Environment shaping: An alternative approach to development and aid. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 1(Spring).Google Scholar
  116. Wells, N. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wenger, E. (2003). Communities of practice and social learning systems. In D. Nicoline, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 75–99). New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  118. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., et al. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  119. Williams, J. (2007). Thinking as natural: Another look at human exemptionalism. Human Ecology Review, 14(2), 130–139.Google Scholar
  120. Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., et al. (2003). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civic Ecology Lab, Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations