Advertisement

Valuing Urban Forest: Lessons to Learn from Hurricanes

  • R. Bruce HullEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In addition to their more recognized ecosystem service functions, urban forests are valued for the cherished meanings and memories they symbolize. Residents draw emotional strength from the stories, people, and events associated with trees. Disaster and disturbance events that destroy the urban forest therefore threaten and damage residents’ attachment to place, and perhaps even their sense of identity. The symbolic qualities of the urban forest even may motivate community response and resilience to hazards. Implications for planning and maintenance of urban tree canopy are discussed.

Keywords

Urban forest Arboriculture Identity Place attachment 

References

  1. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Czikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hull, R. B. (1992). Image congruity, place attachment and community design. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 9, 181–192.Google Scholar
  4. Hull, R. B. (2006). Infinite nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hull, R. B., & Michael, S. E. (1994). Nature based recreation, mood change, and stress restoration. Leisure Sciences, 17, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hull, R. B., Lam, M., & Vigo, G. (1994). Place identity: Symbols of self in the urban fabric. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hull, R. B., Michael, S. E., Walker, G. J., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1996). Ebb and flow of brief leisure experiences. Leisure Sciences, 18, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobi, M., & Stokols, D. (1983). The role of tradition in group environment situations. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives. New York: Prager Press.Google Scholar
  9. Korpela, K. M. (1989). Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of a community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McPherson, E. G., James, R., Peper, P., Maco, S., & Xiao, Q. (2005). Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. Journal of Forestry, 103(8), 411–416.Google Scholar
  13. Mole, G., & Ebenreck, S. (1989). Shading our cities: A resource guide for urban and community forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nowak, D. J., & Dwyer, J. F. (2007). Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In J. E. Kuser (Ed.), Urban and community forestry in the northeast. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rivlin, L. G. (1987). The neighborhood, personal identity, and group affiliations. In I. Altman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Neighborhood and community environments. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sack, R. D. (1988). The consumer’s world: Place as context. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 642–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shumaker, S. A., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Towards a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives. New York: Prager Press.Google Scholar
  20. Smardon, R. C. (1988). Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stokols, D. (1981). Group x place transactions: Some neglected issues in psychological research on settings. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Towards a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Tidball, K. G., Krasny, M. E., et al. (2010). Stewardship, learning, and memory in disaster resilience. Environmental Education Research (Special Issue, Resilience in social-ecological systems: The role of learning and education), 16(5), 341–357.Google Scholar
  23. Tuan, Y. (1980). The significance of artifact. Geographical Review, 70, 462–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolf, K. L. (2005). Business district streetscapes, trees, and consumer response. Journal of Forestry, 8(December), 396–400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Leadership in Global SustainabilityVirginia Tech College of Natural Resources and EnvironmentBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations