Developing the Habits of Mind for a Successful Lesson Study Community

Chapter

Abstract

This paper describes development, implementation and teacher change in a Lesson Study project with eight third-grade teachers. In Part 1 of this chapter we discuss how we adapted Lesson Study to fit the special circumstances of the school system. We describe how we implemented Lesson Study over the course of a summer and school year, and how two outside facilitators stimulated teacher thinking with math explorations and probing/what if questioning during planning and debriefing sessions. In Part 2, we describe our research. Using a framework from Fernandez et al. (Teaching and Teacher Education 19:171–185, 2003) in which they identified three critical lenses necessary for rich lesson study work, we engaged in enumerative analysis of video data from the first and last lesson study cycles to determine if the teachers developed (or failed to develop) those critical lenses. After one year, the eight participating teachers demonstrated a qualitatively richer student lens and curriculum developer lens.

Keywords

Professional Learning Lesson Study Student Thinking Research Lesson Japanese Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cooney, T. J., & Shealy, B. E. (1997). On understanding the structure of teachers’ beliefs and their relationship to change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 87–109). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lewis, C. (Producer). (2000). Can you lift a 100 kilograms? [videotape]. (Available from Mills College Department of Education, 5000 MacArthur Boulevard, Oakland, CA 94613).Google Scholar
  4. Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar
  5. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  9. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 307–332.Google Scholar
  10. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.City Schools of DecaturDecaturUSA

Personalised recommendations