Advertisement

Built in a Field of Dreams? Spatial Engineering and Political Symbolism of South Africa’s Rapid Rail Link Development, Gautrain

  • Ronnie Donaldson
  • Janis van der Westhuizen
Chapter

Abstract

Structural deficiencies in the apartheid city, resulting from segregation and low-density sprawl, created long-distance work travel patterns. It is today widely acknowledged that improved transport and subsequent land use planning play a crucial role in reshaping urban form. Probably the best case study to illustrate this policy in South Africa is the megaengineering project called the Gautrain rapid rail link. It aims to construct a state-of-the-art rapid rail connection between Johannesburg (Africa’s business capital) and Pretoria (the South African capital). The chapter argues that it is necessary to consider the spatial legacy of apartheid and the reorganization of urban spaces in a democratic society when planning for this rapid rail transport corridor. Six problematic issues around the thinking behind the Gautrain and the associated corridor city form are discussed. As, considerations of political symbolism seem to have played a decisive part in.

Keywords

Environmental Impact Assessment Urban Form Global City Mixed Land South African City 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beavon, K. S. O. (2000). Northern Johannesburg: a part of the “rainbow” or neo-apartheid city in the making? Mots Pluriels, 13. Retrieved June 14, 2006, from http://www.arts.uaw.edu.au?MotsPluriels?MP1300kb.html
  2. Black, D., & Van der Westhuizen, J. (2004). The allure of global games for “semi-peripheral” polities and spaces: A research agenda. Third World Quarterly, 25(7), 1195–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cullinane, S. (2003). Hong Kong’s low car dependence: Lessons and prospects. Transport Geography, 11(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Saint-Laurent, B. (1998). Overview of urban transport in South Africa. Paper Presented at the Eighth CODATU conference, Cape Town, September 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Dewar, D. (1994). Planning for rural–urban interface: A case study of Transkei. DBSA, Policy Working Paper No. 9.Google Scholar
  6. Donaldson, R. (2000). Urban restructuring through land development objectives in Pietersburg: An assessment. Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 22–39.Google Scholar
  7. Donaldson, R., & Van der Merwe, I. J. (2000). Urban restructuring outcomes during transition: A model for South African urban development in the 21st century? Africa Insight, 30(1), 45–57.Google Scholar
  8. Emdon, E. (1994). The development facilitation act. Urban Forum, 5(2), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flyvberg, B, Bruzelius, N., & Rothengetter, W. (2003). Megaprojects at risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fox, H. (2000). World Bank urban transport strategy review—Mass rapid transit in developing countries. Retrieved August 20, 2006, from http://www.worldbank.org/transport/utsr/background_papers/uk_mass_transit_halcrow.pdf
  11. Green, C., Aberman, L., & Dominik, T. (2002). Sustainable corridors: Methodology for their planning and development. Paper Presented at the Planning Africa conference, Durban, September.Google Scholar
  12. Green, C., Naude, A., & Hennessy, K. (1995). Integrating South Africa’s low-income residential areas into the wider urban economic and social system. Urban Forum, 6(1), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, P., Todes, A., & Watson, V. (1997). Transforming South Africa’s cities: Prospects for the economic development of urban development. Development Southern Africa, 14(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joburg. (2006). Public urged to vote for a Gautrain logo. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.joburg.org.za/2006/mar/mar8_gautrain.stm
  15. Kenworthy, J. R., & Laube, F. (2002). Urban transport patterns in a global sample of cities and their linkages to transport infrastructure, land use, economics and the environment. World Transport Policy and Practice, 8(3), 5–19.Google Scholar
  16. Kong, L. (2007). Cultural icons and urban development in Asia: Economic imperative, national identity and global city status. Political Geography, 26, 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Radebe, J. ( ). Address at the launch of construction of Gautrain Rapid Rail Link, by Mr Jeff Radebe, MP, Minister of Transport, Marlboro, 26 September. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.gautrain.co.za/printpage.php?fid=9&pid=1202&tit=GautrainRapidRaiLL
  18. Richardson, H. W., Bae, C.-H., & Baxamusa, H. (2000). Compact cities in developing countries: Assessment and implication. In M. Jenks & R. Burgess (Eds.), Compact cities. Sustainable urban forms for developing countries (pp. 25–36). London: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  19. RSA. (1995). Development Facilitation Act, No. 67 of 1995. Government Gazette, Vol. 364, No. 16730. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  20. Schoonraad, M. D. (2000). Cultural and institutional obstacles to compact cities in South Africa. In: M. Jenks & R. Burgess (Eds.), Compact cities. Sustainable urban forms for developing countries (pp. 219–230). London: Fon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Binghamton, NY: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Shilowa, M. (2006). Speech by Gauteng Premier Mbhazima Shilowa at the Launch of the Gautrain project 28 September 2006. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.gautrain.co.za/printpage.php?fid=9&pid=1203&tit=Gautrain
  23. Siemiatycki, M. (2006) Message in a metro: Building urban fail infrastructure and image in Delhi, India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(2), 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steinberg, G. M. (1987). Large-scale national projects as political symbols: The case of Israel, Comparative Politics, 19(3), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Synovate. (2006). Will the Gautrain serve its purpose? Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.bizcommunity.com/PressOffice/PressRelease.aspx?I=478&ai=9879
  26. Tait, A., Gough, D., Ferreira, A., Hendricks, M., McGaffin, R., & Tromplemann A. (1999). Providing for integrated functional cities in South Africa. The Whetton–Landsdowne–Phillipi corridor programme. Urban Forum, 10(2), 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UNCHS (United Nations Centre for Human Settlements). (1997). Transport and Communications for Urban Development: Report of the Habitat 2 Global workshop, Nairobi, UNCHS.Google Scholar
  28. Urban-Econ. (1997). Mabopane-Centurion development corridor. Directorate Land Use and Transport Planning. Pretoria: Pretoria City Council.Google Scholar
  29. Van Wee, B. (2002). Land use and transport: Research and policy challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(4), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations