Megaprojects in India: Environmental and Land Acquisition Issues in the Road Sector

  • G. Raghuram
  • Samantha Bastian
  • Satyam Shivam Sundaram
Chapter

Abstract

Megaprojects attract around 10% of the gross fixed capital formation in India. These projects suffer from both time and cost overruns primarily because of environmental and land acquisition controversies and poor project management. With increasing proportions of private sector investments and a growing focus on efficiency in the public sector, the central government has taken many steps towards making the process of environmental clearances faster and smoother, thus reducing land acquisition controversies. We briefly describe the evolution of the regulatory framework related to environmental and land acquisition aspects in India and also discuss two megaprojects implemented in the road sector.

Keywords

Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Impact Assessment National Highway Land Acquisition High Speed Diesel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ADB. (2005). Asian development outlook. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Chakrabarti, B. (2008). Role of agencies in land acquisition: Problem of coordination and process failure. Writers’ Workshop, 3i network, IIM Ahmedabad.Google Scholar
  3. Centre to Simplify Rules for Environmental Clearance. (2003). Retrieved December 8, 2008, from Times of India, Mumbai. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?artid=33606523
  4. EPA. (1986). Environment protection act. Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest.Google Scholar
  5. India Core. Retrieved December 6, 2008, from India Core: http://www.indiacore.com/environment.html
  6. Mile by Mile, India Paves a Smoother Road to Its Future, December 4, 2005. Retrieved December 9, 2008, from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com
  7. Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation. (2003). Retrieved October 8, 2008, from Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi: http://mospi.gov.in/login_correct1.htm?rept_id=esu01_2003&type=nsso
  8. MoEF (Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India). (2006). Retrieved October 8, 2008, from: Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India, New Delhi: http://envfor.nic.in
  9. Morris, S., & Pandey, A. (2007). Towards reform of land acquisition framework in India. Environmental and Political Weekly, 42(22), 2083–2090, June 02–June 08, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Pstigo, A. (2008). Financing road infrastructure in China and India: Current trends and future options. Journal of Asian Policy, 1(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raghuram, G., & Sundaram, S. S. (2009). Lessons from leveraging land: A case of Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor. India Infrastructure Report 2009, 3i Network, 241–248.Google Scholar
  12. The Definition to Indian Law. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from INDLAW: http://www.indlaw.com
  13. Wildlife Protection Society of India. Retrieved September 12, 2008, from Wildlife Protection Society of India, New Delhi: http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/Environ_sys/doc2004-05/eneia240820.html
  14. World Bank. (2007). World development indicators. Washington DC: World Bank CD ROM version.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Raghuram
    • 1
  • Samantha Bastian
    • 1
  • Satyam Shivam Sundaram
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Systems GroupIndian Institute of Management-AhmedabadAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations