Advertisement

Engineering Earth pp 2173-2184 | Cite as

A Perspective on Weather Modification: Planned and Inadvertent

  • Nancy Westcott
Chapter

Abstract

Weather modification has traditionally had two components: planned, referring to cloud seeding to increase rain or snow, decrease hail, reduce the destructiveness of hurricanes or dissipate fog, and inadvertent referring to the impact of large urban cities on the local weather (winds, precipitation, lightning, and aerosol concentrations). This chapter briefly examines 60 years of weather modification practices, research, results, and lessons that may be relevant to decisions regarding climate modification. For climate, one must consider whether issues related to scientific credibility, technological and logistical limitations, proof of concept requirements, effects of unexpected consequences, and funding cycles can be sufficiently resolved to provide both beneficial and verifiable results.

Keywords

Urban Heat Island Cloud System Silver Iodide Cloud Property Cumulus Cloud 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Stanley A. Changnon, Jr. for his encouragement and insight into weather modification. The reviews of James Angel and David Kristovich were very helpful. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Illinois State Water Survey.

References

  1. Adegoke, J. O., Pielke, R. A., Sr., Eastman, J., Mahmood, F., & Hubbard, K. G. (2002). Impact of irrigation on midsummer surface fluxes and temperature under dry synoptic conditions: a regional atmospheric model study of the U.S. High Plains. Monthly Weather Review, 131(3), 556–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnston, A. G., & Schickedanz, P. T. (1984). The effect of irrigation on warm season precipitation in the southern Great Plains. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 23(6), 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigg, E. K. (1995). Tests for persistent effects of cloud seeding in a recent Australian experiment. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 23(11), 583–600.Google Scholar
  4. Bigg, E. K. (1990). Long-term trends in ice nucleus concentrations. Atmospheric Research, 25, 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byers, H. R. (1974). The history of weather modification. In W. H. Hess (Ed.), Weather and climate modification (pp. 1–44). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Carleton, A. M., Travis, D. J., Master, K., & Vezhapparambu, S. (2008). Composite atmospheric environments on jet contrail outbreaks for the United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47(2), 641–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerveny, R., & Holle, R. (2008). Irving P. Krick: Weather fraud or weather genius? Weatherwise, 61(4), 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Changnon, S. A., Jr. (1973). Weather modification in 1972: Up or down? Bulletin American Meteorological Society, 54(7), 642–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Changnon, S. A., Jr. (1980a). Weather modification: winners and losers. Water Spectrum, 12(2), 29–39.Google Scholar
  10. Changnon, S. A., Jr. (1980b). The rational for future weather modification research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 61(6), 546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Changnon S. A., Jr. (1981). Midwestern cloud, sunshine and temperature trends since 1901: Possible evidence of jet contrail effects. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 20(5), 496–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Changnon, S. A., Jr., & Lambright, W. H. (1987). The rise and fall of federal weather modification policy. Journal of Weather Modification, 19(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Changnon, S. A., Jr., Semonin, R. G., Auer, A. H., Braham, R. R., Jr., & Hales, J. M. (1981). METROMEX: A Review and Summary. Meteorological Monograph, 18(40), Boston: American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
  14. Cotton, W. R., & Pielke, R. A., Sr. (2007). Human impacts on weather and climate. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) and Sydney Catchment Authority. (2007). Workshop on Cloud Seeding: Final Draft Report, p. 5.Google Scholar
  16. Elliot, R. D. (1974). Experience of the private sector. In W. H. Hess (Ed.), Weather and climate modification (pp. 45–90). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Farhar, B. (1974). The impact of the Rapid City flood on public opinion about weather modification. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 55(7), 759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fletcher, N. H. (2002). Advice on the impact of pollution on rainfall and the potential benefits of cloud seeding. Report to the Secretary of the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage, p. 31. Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/water/publications/pubs/cloud-seeding.pdf.
  19. Gentry, R. C. (1974). Hurricane modification, Chapter 14. In W. N. Hess (Ed.), Weather and climate modification (pp. 479–521). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Hallet, J., & Moosop, S. C. (1974). Production of secondary ice particles during the riming process. Nature, 249, 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hildebrand, P. H., Towery, N. G., & Snell, M. R. (1979). Measurement of convective mean rainfall over small areas using high-density raingages and radar. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 18(10), 1316–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hollinger, S. E. & Changnon, S. A., Jr., (1993). Response of corn and soybean yields to precipitation augmentation, and implications for weather modification in Illinois. Champaign, IL: Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin 73.Google Scholar
  23. Huff, F. A., & Shipp, W. L. (1969). Spatial correlations of storm, monthly and seasonal precipitation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 8(4), 542–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huff, F. A. (1970). Sampling errors in measurement of mean precipitation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 9(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huff, F. A. (1971). Evaluation of precipitation records in weather modification experiments. In H. Landsberg & J. Van Mieghem (Eds.), Advances in geophysics (Vol. 15, pp. 60–135). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2001). Summary for policymakers: A report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/
  27. Johnson, D. B. (1982). The role of giant and ultragiant aerosol particles in warm rain initiation. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 39(2), 448–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahan, A. M., Rottner, D., Sena, R., & Keyes, C. G., Jr. (Eds.). (1995). Guidelines for clouod seeding to augment precipitation. New York: American Society for Civil Engineers, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 81.Google Scholar
  29. Kemp, D. D. (2004). Exploring environmental issues: An integrated approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Landsberg, H. E. (1981). The urban climate. International Geophysics Series, 28. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Marquart, S., Ponater, M., Mager, F., & Sausen, R. (2003). Future development of contrail cover, optical depth, and radiative forcing: Impacts of increasing air traffic and climate change. Journal of Climate, 16(17), 2890–2904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Research Council. (2003). Critical issues in weather modification research. NRC Committee on the status and future directions in U.S. weather modification research and operations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10829.htm.Google Scholar
  33. National Research Council. (2005). Radiative forcing of climate change: Expanding the concept and addressing uncertainties. Committee on Radiative Forcing Effects on Climate. Climate Research Committee, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (BASC). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11175.html.Google Scholar
  34. National Weather Modification Advisory Board (NWMAB). (1978). The management of weather resources (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  35. Rango A. L., & Hobbs, P. V. (1993). Further analysis of the climax cloud seeding experiment. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 32(12), 1837–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sparks, J., Changnon, D., & Starke, J. (2002). Changes in the frequency of extreme warm-season surface dewpoints in Northeastern Illinois: implications for cooling-system design and operation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 41(8), 890–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Super, A. B. (1986). Further exploratory analysis of the Bridger range winter cloud seeding experiment. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 25(12), 1926–1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Super, A. B., & Boe, B. A. (1988). Microphysical effects of wintertime cloud seeding with silver iodide over the Rocky Mountains. Part III. Observations over the Grand Mesa, Colorado. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 27(10), 1166–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Westcott, N. E. (2009). Differences in multi-sensor and raingage precipitation amounts. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Water Management, 162(MW2), 73–81.Google Scholar
  40. Westcott, N. E., Knapp, H. V., & Hilberg, S. D. (2008). Comparison of gage and multi-sensor precipitation estimates over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Journal of Hydrology, 351(1–2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, C. B., & Brunsell, N. A. (2008). Evaluating NEXRAD estimates for the Missouri river basin: Analysis using daily raingage data. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 13(7), 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois State Water Survey, Institute of Natural Resource StabilityUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations