Engineering Earth pp 1937-1955 | Cite as

Social Engineering: Creating and Now Undoing Apartheid’s Structures

Chapter

Abstract

Perhaps no other country has experienced as much and as detailed socio-political engineering as apartheid South Africa. The apartheid project impacted people’s lives at every level, always with the goal of creating a set of parallel but grossly unequal spatial realities with almost no meaningful contacts between the population groups. This apartheid era legacy is one of enormous inequalities reflected in landscapes of separate, ethnically determined social worlds filled with despair for non-White South Africans. The bulldozing of two residential districts – South End in Port Elizabeth and Sophiatown in Johannesburg – are used as examples of government policies intent on breaking up mixed-race areas in order to create the “neat” residential areas that were such an integral part of apartheid planning. In the post-apartheid era, planners now have the task of undoing the many legacies created by the racially based system. Since 1994 there has been significant improvement in service delivery and in quality of life conditions for previously disenfranchised South Africans, but most of that change has taken place within already defined residential districts, so that many of the previously racially segregated residential districts remain as rigidly segregated today as they were during apartheid. The persistence of the pattern of racial segregation is seen as an outcome of municipal policies which focuses on service delivery in situ and rather than on the deliberate racial integration of residential areas. It is posited that not implementing policies of social integration could cause difficulties for future national cohesion and development.

Keywords

Residential Segregation Racial Segregation Group Area Residential District Forced Removal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barnard, W. S., & Nel, A. (1981). Our new world: Senior secondary course in geography. Cape Town: Maskew Miller.Google Scholar
  2. Christopher, A. J. (1987). Apartheid planning in South Africa: The case of Port Elizabeth. The Geographical Journal, 153(2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christopher, A. J. (2001). Urban segregation in post-apartheid South Africa. Urban Studies, 38(3), 449–466.Google Scholar
  4. Christopher, A. J. (2005). The slow pace of desegregation in South African cities, 1996–2001. Urban Studies, 42(12), 2305–2320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cloete, F., Schlemmer, L. & Van Vuuren, D (1991). Policy options for a new South Africa. Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  6. Du Pré, R. (Ed.). (1997). South End as we knew it. Port Elizabeth: Western Research Group.Google Scholar
  7. Guyot, S. & Seethal, C. (2007). Identity of place, places of identities: Changes of place names in post-apartheid South Africa. The South African Geographical Journal, 89(1), 55–63.Google Scholar
  8. Hook, D., & Vrdoljak, M. (2002). Gated communities, heterotopia and a “rights” of privilege: A ‘heteropology’ of the South African security-park. Geoforum, 33, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kay, D. (2004). South Africa city planning: A study in post-1994 national planning legislation. Lulu Marketplace. Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://www.lulu.com/content/1741591
  10. Kelso, C. (1999). Ideology of mapping in apartheid South Africa. South African Geographical Journal, 81(1), 15–21.Google Scholar
  11. Kirk, J. (1991). A ‘native’ free state at Korsten: challenge to segregation in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 17(2), 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mabin, A., & Smit, D. (1997). Reconstructing South Africa’s cities? The making of urban planning 1900–2000. Planning Perspectives, 12, 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maharaj, B., & Ramutsindela, M. (2002). Introduction: Post-apartheid political dispensation – New or old geographies? GeoJournal, 57, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mandela, N. (2002). Acceptance speech at the International Geographic Union conference, Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
  15. Mattera, D. (1983). Azanian love songs. Johannesburg: Skotaville.Google Scholar
  16. Mueller-Friedman, F. (2006). Beyond the post-apartheid city: De/segregation and suburbanization in Windhoek, Namibia. African Geographical Review, 25, 33–61.Google Scholar
  17. Nel, J. G. (1989). The making of an apartheid city: The case of Port Elizabeth, Republic of South Africa. African Urban Quarterly, 4(3 and 4), 330–340.Google Scholar
  18. Plaatje, S. T. (1916). Native life in South Africa. London: P.S.King.Google Scholar
  19. Reintges, C., & McCarthy, J. (1992). Reconstructing political geography in South Africa. In C. Rogerson, & J. McCarthy, (Eds.), Geography in a changing South Africa: Progress and prospects. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rich, P. (1990). Race and empire in British politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schensul, D. (2008). Remaking an apartheid city: State-led spatial transformation in Durban, South Africa. PhD dissertation, Brown University, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, B. (1994). Local government and ‘Coloured’ residential segregation in Port Elizabeth, 1964–1976. South African Geographical Journal, 76(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, L. (1990). A history of South Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyBridgewater State UniversityBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations