Advertisement

The Global Geomagnetic Observatory Network

  • Jean L. Rasson
  • Hiroaki Toh
  • Dongmei Yang
Chapter
Part of the IAGA Special Sopron Book Series book series (IAGA, volume 5)

Abstract

The paper provides a snapshot of the global geomagnetic observatory network at the time of the Sopron IAGA Assembly in August 2009. The need for these observatories is explained and the evolution and outlook of the observing techniques are examined. We present three projects addressing the upgrade of existing observatories, the creation of new ones and the problems of observing in the oceanic regions.

Keywords

Magnetic Observatory Fluxgate Magnetometer Geomagnetic Observatory International Geophysical Year Geomagnetic Secular Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ameen A, Ashfaque M, Borodin P, Brenes J, Daudi E, Efendi N, Flower S, Hidayat M, Husni M, Kampine M, Kusonski O, Langa A, Monge I, Mucussete A, Murtaza M, Nhatsave A, Oca Santika K, Rasson J, Riddick J, Suharyadi D, Turbitt C. and Yusuf M, (2009) Indigo: Better Geomagnetic Observatories where we Need Them, IAGA Sopron Poster session 502-MON-P1700-0162Google Scholar
  2. Anlong C, Jinping Z, Yufen G (1990) The adjustment and optimization of geomagnetic fundamental network in China (in Chinese). Seismol Geomagnetic Observ Res 11(6):42–49Google Scholar
  3. Barker FS, Barraclough DR (1985) The effects of the non-uniform distribution of magnetic observatory data on secular variation models. Phys Earth Planet Inter 37:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beranzoli L et al (2003) Mission results from the first GEOSTAR observatory (Adriatic Sea, 1998). Earth Planet Space 55:361–373Google Scholar
  5. Borrero JC et al (2009) The tsunami of 2007 September 12, Bengkulu province, Sumatra, Indonesia: post-tsunami field survey and numerical modelling. Geophys J Int 178(1):180–194. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X. 2008.04058.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chave AD et al (1995) Report of a workshop on technical approaches to construction of a seafloor geomagnetic observatory, Woods Hole Oceanogr. Inst Tech Rep WHOI-95-12, 43 pp. darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org:8080/handle/1912/514?show=full
  7. China Earthquake Administration (2004) Specification for the construction of seismic station: geomagnetic station (in Chinese). Seismological Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  8. Holme R, Olsen N (2006) Core surface flow modeling from high-resolution secular variation, Geophys. J Int 166:518–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. International Association of geomagnetism and aeronomy (IAGA) division V, working Group VMOD: geomagnetic field modeling 2005. The 10th-Generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field. Geophys J Int 161:561–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kerridge, D, (2001) INTERMAGNET: Worldwide near-real-time geomagnetic observatory data. Proceedings of Workshop on Space Weather, ESTEC, www.intermagnet.org/publications/IM_ESTEC.pdf
  11. Korepanov V, Klymovych Ye, Kuznetsov O, Pristay A, Marusenkov A, Rasson JL, (2007) New INTERMAGNET Fluxgate Magnetometer. Publs Inst Geophys Pol Acad Sc C-99(398):291–298Google Scholar
  12. Korte M, Mandea M, Linthe HJ, Hemshorn A, Kotzé P, Ricaldi E (2009) New Geomagnetic Field Observations In the South Atlantic Anomaly Region. Ann Geoph 52:65–81Google Scholar
  13. Langel RA, Baldwin RT, Green AW (1995) Toward an improved distribution of magnetic observatories for modeling of the main geomagnetic field and its temporal change. J Geomag Geoelectr 47:475–508Google Scholar
  14. Law LK, Greenhouse JP (1981) Geomagnetic variation sounding of the asthenosphere beneath the Juan de Fuca Ridge. J Geophys Res 86(B2):967–978. doi:10.1029/JB086iB02p00967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luther DS, Filloux JH, Chave AD (1991) Low-frequency, motionally induced electromagnetic fields in the ocean: 2. Electric field and Eulerian current comparison. J Geophys Res 96(C7):12797–12814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moussaoui N, Holzlöhner R, Hackenberg W, Bonaccini Calia D (2009) Dependence of sodium laser guide star photon return on the geomagnetic field. A A 501(2):793–799Google Scholar
  17. Neubert T et al (2001) Ørsted satellite captures high-precision geomagnetic field data. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 82:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsen N (2002) A model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Ørsted data. Geophys J Int 149:454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Overhauser AW (1953) Polarization of nuclei in metals. Phys Rev 92:411–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rasson J, Giannibelli JC, Pelliciuoli AO (1996) A new digital magnetic observatory in Trelew Patagonia. Rom J Geophys 17:37–42Google Scholar
  21. Reigber C, Luhr H, Schwintzer P (2002) CHAMP mission status. Adv Space Res 30:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Romanowicz B et al (2006) The Monterey Bay broadband ocean bottom seismic observatory. Ann Geophys 49:607–623Google Scholar
  23. Rongsheng G, Qizheng S (1999) Geomagnetic observation in China (in Chinese). Seismol Geomagnetic Observ Res 20(5): 47–53Google Scholar
  24. Sabaka TJ, Olsen N, Purucker ME (2004) Extending comprehensive models of the Earth’s magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data. Geophys J Int 159:521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salisbury MH et al (2006) 2. Leg 195 Synthesis: Site 1201—A geological and geophysical section in the West Philippine Basin from the 660-km discontinuity to the mudline. Proceedings of Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Reports 195:27Google Scholar
  26. Sanford TB (1971) Motionally induced electric and magnetic fields in the sea. J Geophys Res 76:3476–3492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Segawa J, Toh H (1992) Detecting fluid circulation by electric field variations at the Nankai trough. Earth Planet Sci Lett 109:469–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shipboard Scientific Party of ODP Leg 191 (2000) Northwest Pacific seismic observatory and hammer drill tests, Proceedings of Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports 191Google Scholar
  29. Toh H, Hamano Y (1997) The first realtime measurement of seafloor geomagnetic total force—Ocean Hemisphere Project Network. J Japan Soc Mar Surv Tech 9:1–13Google Scholar
  30. Toh H, Hamano Y, Goto T (1998) A new seafloor electromagnetic station with an Overhauser magnetometer, a magnetotelluric variograph and an acoustic telemetry modem. Earth Planets Space 50:895–903Google Scholar
  31. Toh H et al (2004) Geomagnetic observatory operates at the seafloor in the northwest Pacific Ocean. Eos Trans AGU 85:467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Toh H, Hamano Y Ichiki M (2006) Long-term seafloor geomagnetic station in the northwest Pacific: A possible candidate for a seafloor geomagnetic observatory. Earth Planet Space 58:697–705Google Scholar
  33. Toh H, Kanezaki H, Ichiki M (2007) A regional model of the geomagnetic field over the Pacific Ocean for epoch 2002. Geophys Res Lett 34Google Scholar
  34. World Data Centre for Geomagnetism, Kyoto (2008) Data catalogue, No. 28, 182 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Zongqi C (1944) Review of geomagnetic observation in China (in Chinese). Acad Trans 1:99–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Royal Météorologique de BelgiqueCentre de Physique du GlobeDourbes, ViroinvalBelgium
  2. 2.Data Analysis Center for Geomagnetism and Space Magnetism, Graduate School of ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Institute of GeophysicsChina Earthquake AdministrationHaidan District, BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations