Advertisement

Cause and Consequences

  • Robert B. Smith
Chapter

Abstract

Probing the causes of effects, the contextual analyses of the previous four chapters exemplified Coleman’s (1964, 116, 189–240) emphasis on quantifying the implied causal effects of several predetermining variables on a response. Probing the effects of a cause (Holland 1986, 945; Morgan and Winship 2007, 280–282), these chapters on evaluative research exemplify Rubin’s (1974) emphasis on studying the effects of a manipulated cause—here, some consequences of comprehensive school reform (CSR) on measures of achievement. Because these chapters study repeated measures on the same schools, they are similar to studies that analyze panel data. But, because of the students’ mobility out of and into these schools, and other changes in the compositions of the schools, these chapters are best viewed as analyzing repeated quasi-panel data.

Keywords

Propensity Score Student Achievement Comparison School Reform Model Average Causal Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achen, Christopher H. 1986. The statistical analysis of quasi-experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aladjem, Daniel K., Kerstin Carlson LeFloch, Yu Zhang, Anja Kurki, Andrea Boyle, James E. Taylor, Suzannah Herrmann, Kazuaki Uekawa, Kerri Thomsen, and Olatokunbo Fashola. September 2006. Models matter—the final report of the national longitudinal evaluation of comprehensive school reform. Washington, DC: American Institutes of Research.Google Scholar
  3. Berends, Mark, Susan Bodily, and Sheila Nataraj Kirby. 2002. Facing the challenges of whole school reform: New American schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  4. Borman, Geoffrey D., Gina M. Hewes, L.T. Overman, and S. Brown. 2003. Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 73: 125–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burd-Sharps, Sarah, Kristen Lewis, and Eduardo Borges Martins. 2008. The measure of America: American human development report 2008–2009. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, James S. 1964. Introduction to mathematical sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, James S. 1972. Policy research in the social sciences. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  8. Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center. 2006. CSQR Center report on elementary school comprehensive school reform models. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
  9. Etzioni, Amitai. 1968. The active society: A theory of societal and political process. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Firth, David. 1993. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraser, Steven (ed.). 1995. The bell curve wars: Race, intelligence, and the future of America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, Howard. 1983. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Goldberg, Bruce, and John Richards. 1996. The Co-NECT design for school change. In Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs, ed. Samuel C. Stringfield, Steven M. Ross, and Lana Smith, 75–108. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Herrnstein, Richard J., and Charles Murray. 1994. Bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hirsch Jr., E.D. 2010. How to save the schools. The New York Review of Books 67(8, May 13): 16–19.Google Scholar
  16. Holland, Paul. 1986. Statistics and causal inference (with comments). Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Imbens, Guido I., and Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. 2009. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47(1): 5–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacoby, Russel, and Naomi Glauberman (eds.). 1995. The bell curve debate: History, documents, opinions. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  19. Murray, Charles. 2008. Real education: Four simple truths for bringing America’s schools back to reality. New York: Crown Forum.Google Scholar
  20. Myrdal, Gunnar. [1944] 1964. An American dilemma. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Ravitch, Diane. 2010. The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Donald B. Rubin. [1983] 2006. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. In Matched sampling for causal effects, ed. Donald B. Rubin, 170–184. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rubin, Donald B. 1974. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, Robert B. 2006. Introduction to James S. Coleman, the mathematics of ollective action. New Brunswick, NJ: AldineTransaction. vii–li.Google Scholar
  25. Weber, Max. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization, translated by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2006. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach, 3rd ed. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Structural Research Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations