Skip to main content

Resource Equivalency Methods in the European Union: A ‘Toolkit’ for Calculating Environmental Liability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Equivalency Methods for Environmental Liability

Abstract

We developed a methodological toolkit for performing resource equivalency analyses in the European Union, supported by European Commission DG Research and Innovation through the REMEDE project (Resource Equivalency Methods for Assessing Environmental Damage in the European Union). The purpose of the Toolkit is to provide users with an overview of resource equivalency methods in the context of the Environmental Liability Directive, Habitats Directive, Wild Birds Directive, and Environmental Impact Assessment Directive. The Toolkit outlines analytical steps that can be used to assess and remediate different types of environmental damages and incidents covered by these Directives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that primary remediation is not a component of the Toolkit but is described here for completeness.

  2. 2.

    As amended by Directive 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on Safety of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations.

  3. 3.

    In some cases, damages may be represented using a single metric for scaling purposes (e.g., hectares of habitat; organism abundance). In other cases, multiple metrics may be employed and the Competent Authority could scale remediation based on the results of a series of equivalency calculations. Finally, compound metrics may also be used in which different measures of resource or service changes are combined into a single metric.

  4. 4.

    If harm accrues into perpetuity, operators must pay for it. However, because a positive discount rate typically is used, perpetuity often can be approximated by a time frame on the order of 50–100 years (depending on the discount rate used).

  5. 5.

    An analogy that has been used to support this argument is that loss of an arm or a leg in an accident does not represent a 25% loss of ‘limb services.’ Rather, full compensation would require wholly restoring the injury.

References

  • Descamps, H. (2005). Liability for environmental damage in Belgium (Flemish Region) in 2005. ERA Forum, 6(3), 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). Guidance document on Article 6(4) of the ‘Habitats Directive’ 92/43/EEC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, N., & Thacher, J. (2002). Money, who needs it? Natural resource damage assessment. Contemporary Economic Policy, 20(2), 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1993). The Measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2003). Ecosystem and human wellbeing: A framework for assessment. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2006). Habitat equivalency analysis: An overview. Prepared for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Damage Assessment and Restoration Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, B. (1999). Habitat equivalency analysis: Conceptual background and hypothetical example. Washington DC: National Park Service, Environmental Quality Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury, H. M. (2003). The green book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafonte, M., & Hampton, S. (2007). Exploring welfare implications of resource equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Lipton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lipton, J., Özdemiroğlu, E., LeJeune, K., Peers, J. (2018). Resource Equivalency Methods in the European Union: A ‘Toolkit’ for Calculating Environmental Liability. In: Lipton, J., Özdemiroğlu, E., Chapman, D., Peers, J. (eds) Equivalency Methods for Environmental Liability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9812-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics