Advertisement

Health Benefits of Nature Experience: The Challenge of Linking Practice and Research

  • Ann Van HerzeleEmail author
  • Simon Bell
  • Terry Hartig
  • Marie Therese Camilleri Podesta
  • Ronald van Zon
Chapter

Abstract

While there is a growing base of knowledge concerning the health benefits of nature experience, this knowledge appears to be insufficiently translated into practice. The perceived gap between research and practice is often explained by a lack of hard evidence on the effects and mechanisms at work. In this chapter we argue that strengthening the evidence base is only one of the areas where more needs be done. Converting the evidence into practice is a process that requires concerted attempts with different kinds of effort, and should therefore be viewed from different perspectives. We examine the topic from three distinct perspectives: problem definition (who is responsible?); acceptability (what constitutes acceptable evidence?); applicability (can the evidence be used in practice?). Throughout, we use examples from various disciplinary fields to illustrate the significant challenges and complexities faced in joining practice and research.

Keywords

Nature Experience Health Relationship British Heart Foundation Causal Story Urban Green Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abramsson K, Tenngart C (2006) ‘Nature and health’ in Sweden. In: Hassink J, van Dijk M (eds) Farming for health. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N (2001) Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med 33(5):434–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer AR (1990) Environmental planning for site development. Chapmann and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell S (2008) Design for outdoor recreation, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bioforsk (2006) Effect of urban areas on human health and well being. Review of current literature. Bioforsk Fokus 1(6). As, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  6. Blamey A, Mutrie N (2004) Changing the individual to promote health-enhancing physical activity: the difficulties of producing evidence and translating it into practice. J Sports Sci 22:741–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organ Sci 12:198–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape Urban Plan 68(1):129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coeterier JF (1996) Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 34:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dopson S, Locock L, Gabbay J, Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L (2003) Evidence-based medicine and the implementation gap. Health 7(3):311–330Google Scholar
  11. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C (2005) The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manage J 48(1):117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, Hawkins C (2003) Innovation in healthcare: how does credible evidence influence professionals? Health Social Care Commun 11(3):219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Floistad IS, Waaseth G, Saebo A, Grawonsky S (2008) Effect of urban green areas on human health and well being: review of current literature and ongoing activities. Poster presented at COST E39 conference, Hamar, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  14. Frumkin H (2001) Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20:234–240Google Scholar
  15. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ (2002) The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med 54:1793–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwood DJ, Levin M (1998) Introduction to action research: social research for social change. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartig T, Evans GW (1993) Psychological foundations of nature experience. In: Gärling T, Evans GW (eds) Advances in psychology, vol 96: Behavior and environment: psychological and geographical approaches, pp 427–457. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartig T, Cooper Marcus C (2006) Essay: healing gardens – places for nature in healthcare. Lancet 368:S36–S37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hassink J, van Dijk M (2006) Farming for health. Green care farming across Europe and the United States of America. Springer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  20. Health Council and Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment (2004) Nature and health: the influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being. Publication 2004/09E, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  21. Henwood K (2002) Environment and health: is there a role for environmental and countryside agencies in promoting benefits to health? Issues in Health Development, Health Development Agency, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Ryan R (1998) With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Karmanov D, Hamel R (2008) Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environ-ment(s): beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landsc Urban Plan 86:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knopf R (1983) Recreational needs and behavior in natural settings. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Human behavior and environment: advances in theory and research, vol 6. Behav Nat Environ, pp 205–240. Plenum Press, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Knopf RC (1987) Human behavior, cognition, and affect in the natural environment. In: Stokols D, Altman L (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 783–825Google Scholar
  27. Leeuwis C (2004) Communication for rural innovation. Blackwell Science, CTA, Oxford/WageningenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maas J, Verheij R (2007) Are health benefits of physical activity in natural environments used in primary care by general practitioners in the Netherlands? Urban Forest Urban Green 6(4):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Health Service (2001) Exercise referral systems: a national quality assurance framework. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Nilsson K, Baines C, Konijnendijk CC (2007) Health and the natural outdoors. Final report COST Strategic Workshop, Larnaca, Cyprus, 19–21 April 2007Google Scholar
  31. OPENspace Research Centre (2003) Health, well-being and open space literature review. OPENspace, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  32. OPENspace research centre (2008) Greenspace and quality of life: a critical literature review. Greenspace Scotland, StirlingGoogle Scholar
  33. Parr H (2007) Mental health, nature work and social inclusion. Environ Plan D: Soc Space 25(3):537–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheldon TA, Guyatt GH, Haines A (1998) When to act on the evidence. BMJ 317(7151):139–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stigsdotter UA, Grahn P (2002) What makes a garden a healing garden? J Ther Horticult 13:60–69Google Scholar
  36. Stone DA (1989) Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Polit Sci Quart 104(2):281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Herzele A (2005) A tree on your doorstep, a forest in your mind. Greenspace planning at the interplay between discourse, physical conditions, and practice. Wageningen University and Research Centre, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Herzele A (2006) A forest for each city and town: story lines in the policy debate for urban forests in Flanders. Urban Stud 43(3):673–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verheij RA (1996) Explaining urban-rural variations in health: a review of interactions between individual and environment. Soc Sci Med 42(6):923–935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. WHO (2002) The world health report 2002 – reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Van Herzele
    • 1
    Email author
  • Simon Bell
    • 2
    • 3
  • Terry Hartig
    • 4
  • Marie Therese Camilleri Podesta
    • 5
  • Ronald van Zon
    • 6
  1. 1.Research Institute for Nature and ForestBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Open Space Research CentreEdinburgh College of ArtEdinburghUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Department of Landscape ArchitectureEstonian University of Life SciencesTartuEstonia
  4. 4.Institute for Housing and Urban ResearchUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  5. 5.Anatomy DepartmentUniversity of MaltaTal-QroqqMalta
  6. 6.Independent consultantHaarlemThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations