Skip to main content
View expanded cover

Forests, Trees and Human Health pp 127–168Cite as

Health Benefits of Nature Experience: Psychological, Social and Cultural Processes

Abstract

In this chapter we consider how experiences of nature can affect human health and well-being. We first address the matter of ‘what has been’; that is, we sketch the development of theory and research concerned with health benefits of natural environments, from ancient times to the current situation. This shows the current research to be a recent expression of a number of long-running, intertwined, social and cultural processes. We then discuss ‘where we are now’; that is, we overview current theories and related research concerning processes through which nature experience might provide health benefits. These processes concern environmental preferences, psychological restoration, and learning and personal development. Finally, we consider ‘where we are going’; that is, we consider some additional directions for research and we identify some issues that research will have to address in the foreseeable future.

Keywords

  • Fractal Dimension
  • Natural Environment
  • Nature Experience
  • Environmental Preference
  • Subjective Aspect

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1_5
  • Chapter length: 42 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-90-481-9806-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abello RP, Bernaldez FG (1986) Landscape preference and personality. Landscape Urban Plan 13:19–28

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson L, Seligman M, Teasdale J (1978) Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. J Abnorm Psychol 87:49–74

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aks DJ, Sprott JC (1996) Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns. J Empirical Stud Arts 4:1–16

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D (2009) Humanizing the hospital: design lessons from a Finnish sanatorium. Canadian Medical Association Journal, September, doi:10.1503/cmaj.090075

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky A (1979) Health, stress, and coping. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton J (1975) The experience of landscape. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton J (1996) The experience of landscape, Revisedth edn. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Balling JD, Falk JH (1982) Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environ Behav 14:5–28

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barnsley M (1993) Fractals everywhere. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnsley MF, Devaney RL, Mandelbrot BB, Peitgen HO, Saupe D, Voss RF (1988) The science of fractal images. Springer, New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer N, Wallner A, Hunziker M (2009) The change of European landscapes: human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J Environ Manage 90:2910–2920

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker P (1994) Theoretische Grundlagen. In: Abele A, Becker P (ed) Wohlbefinden. Theorie – Empirie – Diagnostik. Juventa, Weinheim, pp 13–49. (Becker P (1994) Theoretical foundations. In: Abele A, Becker P (ed) Wellbeing. Theory – empirical data – Diagnostics. Juventa, Weinheim, pp 13–49)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S (2001) Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landscape Urban Plan 54:201–211

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S (2008) The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol Sci 19:1207–1212

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein A (1972) Wilderness as a therapeutic behavior setting. Therap Recreat J 6:160–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Berto R (2005) Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. J Environ Psychol 25:249–259

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin M, Hartig T (2003) Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running? Psychol Sport Exercise 4:141–153

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney SG (1901) Discussion upon climatic treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis versus home sanatoria. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 17:224–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bossdorf O, Richards CL, Pigliucci M (2008) Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecol Lett 11:106–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa SC (1988) Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape Urban Plan 15:241–252

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa SC (1990) A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environ Behav 22:787–812

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs P (1992) Fractals: the patterns of chaos. Thames and Hudson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringslimark T, Hartig T, Patil GG (2007) Psychological benefits of indoor plants in workplaces: putting experimental results into context. HortScience 42:581–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower D (1990) For Earth’s sake: the life and times of David Brower. Gibbs Smith, Salt Lake City, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Brügger A, Kaiser FG, Roczen N (in press) One for all: connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature. Euro Psychol. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000032

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck C, Llopis A, Nájera E, Terris M (1989) The challenge of epidemiology: issues and selected readings. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano R (1979) Health, behavior, and the community: an ecological perspective. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang CY, Chen PK (2005) Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience 40:1354–1359

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciancio O, Nocentini S (2000) Forest management from positivism to the culture of complexity. In: Agnoletti M, Anderson S (eds) Methods and approaches in forest history (IUFRO Research Series 3). CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimprich B, Ronis DL (2003) An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 26:284–292

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S (2003) Environmental identity: a conceptual and an operational definition. In: Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) Identity and the natural environment: the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho CM, Purkis H (2009) The origins of specific phobias: influential theories and current perspectives. Rev Gen Psychol 13(4):335–348

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper Marcus C, Barnes M (eds) (1999) Healing gardens: therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC (2001) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Plan 54:267–281

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deci E, Ryan R (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot WT, Van den Born RJG (2003) Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in The Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan 63:127–138

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Hollander AEM, Staatsen BAM (2003) Health, environment and quality of life: an epidemiological perspective on urban development. Landscape Urban Plan 65:53–62

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries S, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P (2003) Natural environments-healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environ Plan A 35:1717–1731

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (1993) New Guineans and their natural world. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 251–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E (2000) Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol 55:34–43

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Lucas RE (2000) Subjective emotional well-being. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM (eds) Handbook of emotions, vol 2. Guilford, New York, pp 325–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1962) Mankind evolving. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Nash R, Haas G (1987) Wilderness benefits: a state-of-knowledge review. In: Lucas RC (ed) Proceedings – National wilderness research conference: issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220, pp 294–319. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubos R (1965) Man adapting. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder K, Ritter M (1996) The social construction of nature: a sociology of ecological enlightenment. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edginton B (1997) Moral architecture: the influence of the York retreat on asylum design. Health Place 3:91–99

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Evernden N (1992) The social creation of nature. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert A, McAvoy L (2000) The effects of wilderness settings on organized groups: a state-of-knowledge paper. In: McCool SF, Cole DN, Borrie WT, O’Loughlin J (eds) Wilderness science in a time of change conference – vol 3: wilderness a place for scientific inquiry. USDA forest service proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3, 2000, pp 13–26. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert A, Place G, Sibthorp J (2005) Early-life outdoor experiences and an individual’s environmental attitudes. Leisure Sci 2:225–239

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman K (2007) Herrarna i skogen. Albert Bonniers Förlag, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH, Balling JD (2009) Evolutionary influence on human landscape preference. Environ Behav. doi:10.1177/0013916509341244

    Google Scholar 

  • Field DJ (1989) What the statistics of natural images tell us about visual coding. SPIE proceedings on Human vision, visual processing and digital display, vol 1077, p 269

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm E (1964) The heart of man. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin H (2001) Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. Am J Prev Med 20:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs T (2003) Bäder und Kuren in der Aufklärung: Medizinaldiskurs und Freizeitvergnügen. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner CF (1901) The importance of an early and radical climatic change in the cure of pulmonary tuberculosis. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 17:202–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garraty JA, Gay P (1972) Columbia history of the world. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geake J, Landini G (1997) Individual differences in the perception of fractal curves. Fractals 5:129–143

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilden DL, Schmuckler MA, Clayton K (1993) The perception of natural contour. Psychol Rev 100:460–478

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez MT, Hartig T, Patil GG, Martinsen EW, Kirkevold M (2010) Therapeutic horticulture in clinical depression: a prospective study of active components. J Adv Nurs 66:2002–2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouyet JF (1996) Physics and fractal structures. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundsten C (2009) Sveriges nationalparker. Bokförlaget Max Ström, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurthrie WKC (1965) Presocratic tradition from Parmenides to Democritus (vol. 2 of his history of greek philosophy). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerhall CM (2005) Fractal dimension as a tool for defining and measuring naturalness. In: Martens B, Keu AG (eds) Designing social innovation – planning, building, evaluating l. Hogrefe and Huber, Cambridge, MA, pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerhall CM, Purcell T, Taylor R (2004) Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. J Environ Psychol 24:247–255

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerhall CM, Laike T, Taylor RP, Küller M, Küller R, Martin TP (2008) Investigations of human EEG response to viewing fractal patterns. Perception 37:1488–1494

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Han KT (2007) Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference, and restorativeness. Environ Behav 39:529–556

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T (1993) Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape Urban Plan 25:17–36

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T (2004) Restorative environments. In: Spielberger C (ed) Encyclopedia of applied ­psychology, vol 3. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 273–279

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T (2007) Three steps to understanding restorative environments as health resources. In: Ward Thompson C, Travlou P (eds) Open space: people space. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 163–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Cooper Marcus C (2006) Essay: healing gardens – places for nature in healthcare. Lancet 368:S36–S37

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Garling T (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol 23(2):109–123

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Fransson U (2009) Leisure home ownership, access to nature, and health: a longitudinal study of urban residents in Sweden. Environ Plan A 41:82–96

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Strumse E (2007) Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behaviour. Environ Conserv 34:291–299

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Korpela K, Evans GW, Gärling T (1997) A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scand Hous Plan Res 14:175–194

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ Behav 23:3–26

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Staats H (2006) The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of ­environmental preferences. J Environ Psychol 26:215–226

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Health Council of the Netherlands (2004) Nature and health. The influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being. Health Council of the Netherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Den Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen JH, Orians GH (1993) Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 138–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog TR (1985) A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. J Environ Psychol 5:225–241

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog TR (1989) A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. J Environ Psychol 9:27–43

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog TR, Leverich OL (2003) Searching for legibility. Environ Behav 35:459–477

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog TR, Maguire CP, Nebel MB (2003) Assessing the restorative components of environments. J Environ Psychol 23:159–170

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt R (2006) The influence of somatic and psychiatric medical theory on the design of nineteenth century American cities. History of Medicine Online. Accessed on the internet on 2010-04-14 at http://www.priory.com/homol/19c.htm

  • Howard E (1902/1946) Garden cities of to-morrow (reprinted). Faber and Faber, London (originally published in 1902)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker M (1995) The spontaneous reafforestation in abandoned agricultural lands: perception and aesthetic assessment by locals and tourists. Landscape Urban Plan 31:399–410

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine KN, Warber SL (2002) Greening healthcare: practicing as if the natural environment really mattered. Altern Ther Health M 8:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1998) Epigenetic inheritance in evolution. J Evol Biol 11:159–183

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson A (2004) Vatten, vandring, vila, vy och variation: den svenska kurparkens gestaltningsidé, exemplet Ronneby Brunnspark (Rapport nr 2004:1). Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för landskapsplanering, Alnarp

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen FS, Koch NE (2004) Twenty-five years of forest recreation research in Denmark and its influence on forest policy. Scand J Forest Res 19(suppl 4):93–102

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Joye Y (2007) Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the case of biophilic architecture. Rev Gen Psychol 11:305–328

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn PH Jr (1997) Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: children’s affiliation with nature. Develop Rev 17:1–61

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (1999) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals E, Schumacher D, Montada L (1999) Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environ Behav 31:178–202

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1987) Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: environmental preferences from an evolutionary perspective. Environ Behav 19:3–32

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15(3):169–182

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Kaplan R (1978) Humanscape: environments for people. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA (republished Ann Arbor, MI: Ulrich’s Books, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Kaplan R (1982) Cognition and environment: functioning in an uncertain world. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Talbot JF (1983) Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Behavior and the natural environment. Plenum, New York, pp 163–203

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1993a) The biological basis for human values of nature. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1993b) Attitudes toward wildlife among the industrial superpowers: the United States, Japan, and Germany. J Soc Issues 49:53–69

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1996) The value of life. Island Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (2002) Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In: Kahn P, Kellert SR (eds) Children and nature: psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 117–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill DC, Field D, Kersten D (1990) Human discrimination of fractal images. J Opt Soc Am 77:1113–1123

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Knopf R (1987) Human behavior, cognition, and affect in the natural environment. In: Stokols D, Altman I (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 783–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk CC (2003) A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Pol Econ 5:173–186

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K, Hartig T (1996) Restorative qualities of favorite places. J Environ Psychol 16:221–233

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM (1989) Place identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. J Environ Psychol 9:241–256

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM, Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Fuhrer U (2001) Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environ Behav 33:572–589

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM, Ylén M (2009) Effectiveness of favorite-place prescriptions: a field experiment. Am J Prev Med 36:435–438

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001) Aggression and violence in the inner city: effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environ Behav 33:543–571

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann K, Gärling T, Stormark KM (2001) Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. J Environ Psychol 21:31–44

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann K, Gärling T, Stormark KM (2003) Selective attention and heart rate responses to ­natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 23:125–134

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac with sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ (1984) Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE (eds) Handbook of psychology and health: vol 4. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 219–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt L (1988) Therapeutic value of wilderness. In: Freilich HR (ed) Wilderness Benchmark 1988: proceedings of the National wilderness colloquium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SE-51, pp 156–168. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein P, Annas P (2000) Heritability and prevalence of specific fears and phobias in childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatr All Disciplines 41:927–937

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhagen A, Hörnsten L (2000) Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: changes in public preferences and behavior. Forestry 73:143–151

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr VI, Pearson-Mims CH (2006) Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded, and conical tree forms. Environ Behav 38:667–688

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006) Green space, urbanity and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Commun Health 60:587–592

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansén E (1998) An image of Paradise: Swedish spas in the 18th Century. Eighteenth Cen Stud 31:511–516

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mausner C (1996) A kaleidoscope model: defining natural environments. J Environ Psychol 16:335–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer FS, Frantz CMP (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol 24:503–515

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meacham S (1999) Regaining paradise: Englishness and the early Garden City movement. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R, Popham F (2007) Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. J Epidemiol Commun Health 61:681–683

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R, Popham F (2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372:1655–1660

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Muir J (1901/1981) Our National Parks. Houghton Mifflin, New York. Republished by University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Naddaf G (2006) The Greek concept of nature. Suny Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash R (1982) Wilderness and the American mind, 3rd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman RS (1980) Alleviating learned helplessness in a wilderness setting: an application of attribution theory to Outward Bound. In: Fyans LJ Jr (ed) Achievement motivation: recent trends in theory and research. Plenum, New York, pp 312–345

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nordh H, Hartig T, Hagerhall C, Fry G (2009) Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forest Urban Green 8:225–235

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman A, Mineka S (2001) Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear learning. Psychol Rev 108:483–522

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted FL (1865/1952) The Yosemite valley and the Mariposa big trees: a preliminary report. with an introductory note by Laura Wood Raper. Landscape Archit 43:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (1980) Habitat selection: general theory and applications to human behavior. In: Lockard JS (ed) The evolution of human social behavior. Elsevier, New York, pp 49–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (1986) An ecological and evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. In: Penning-Rowsell EC, Lowenthal D (eds) Landscape meanings and values. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 4–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH, Heerwagen JH (1992) Evolved responses to landscapes. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 555–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottosson J, Grahn P (2005) A comparison of leisure time spent in a garden with leisure time spent indoors: on measures of restoration in residents in geriatric care. Landscape Res 30(1):23–55

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (1962) Wilderness and recreation – a report on resources, values, and problems (ORRRC Study Report 3). US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pals R, Steg L, Siero FW, van der Zee KI (2009) Development of the PRCQ: a measure of ­perceived restorative characteristics of zoo attractions. J Environ Psychol 29:441–449

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Hirano H, Kagawa T, Sato M, Miyazaki Y (2007) Physiological effects of shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) – using salivary cortisol and cerebral activity as indicators. J Physiol Anthropol 26:123–128

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons R (1991) The potential influences of environmental perception on human health. J Environ Psychol 11:1–23

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons R, Tassinary LG, Ulrich RS, Hebl MR, Grossman-Alexander M (1998) The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. J Environ Psychol 18:113–140

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pickover C (1995) Keys to infinity. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot G (1987) Breaking new ground. Island Press, Washington, DC (originally published by Harcourt, Brace, and Co, New York, 1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt DG, Zube EH (1987) Management of natural environments. In: Stokols D, Altman I (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology, 2. Wiley, New York, pp 1009–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts R (1998) Environmental hypotheses of hominin evolution. Yearbook Phys Anthropol 41:93–136

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN, Peacock J, Sellens M, Griffin M (2005) The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. Int J Environ Health Res 15:319–337

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell AT, Lamb RJ (1984) Landscape perception: an examination and empirical investigation of two central issues in the area. J Environ Manage 19: 31–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Reser JP, Scherl LM (1988) Clear and unambiguous feedback: a transactional and motivational analysis of environmental challenge and self-encounter. J Environ Psychol 8:269–286

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roggenbuck JW, Lucas RC (1987) Wilderness use and user characteristics: a state-of-knowledge review. In: Lucas RC (ed) Proceedings – National wilderness research conference: issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 204–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogowitz BE, Voss RF (1990) Shape perception and low dimension fractal boundary contours. In: Rogowitz BE, Allenbach J (eds) Proceedings of the conference on human vision: methods, models and applications, Santa Clara. SPIE/SPSE symposium on Electron imaging, vol 1249, pp 387–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen G (1993) A history of public health, expandedth edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Runte A (1979) National parks: the American experience. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NB

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell KC (2000) Exploring how the wilderness therapy process relates to outcomes. J Experiential Education 23:170–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Weinstein N, Bernstein J, Brown KW, Mistretta L, Gagné M (2010) Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. J Environ Psychol 30:159–168

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schama S (1995) Landscape and memory. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW (2002) Inclusion with nature: the psychology of human-nature relations. In: Schmuck P, Schultz PW (eds) The psychology of sustainable development. Kluwer, New York, pp 61–78

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV (2004) Choosing restorative environments across the lifespan: a matter of place experience. J Environ Psychol 24:423–437

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (2003) Assessing public perception of landscape: from practice to policy. J Environ Pol Plan 5:123–144

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman MEP (1970) On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychol Rev 77:406–418

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman MEP (1975) Helplessness: on depression, development, and death. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sempik J, Aldrige J, Becker S (2003) Social and therapeutic horticulture: evidence and messages from research: thrive and centre for child and family research. Loughborough University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin WS (2007) The influence of forest view through a window on job satisfaction and job stress. Scand J Forest Res 22:248–253

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Simonič T (2003) Preference and perceived naturalness in visual perception of naturalistic landscapes. Zb Bioteh Fak Univ Ljublj Kmet 81:369–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Spehar B, Clifford CWG, Newell BR, Taylor RP (2003) Universal aesthetic of fractals. Comput Graph 27:813–820

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Staats H, Hartig T (2004) Alone or with a friend: a social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. J Environ Psychol 24:199–211

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Staats H, Kieviet A, Hartig T (2003) Where to recover from attentional fatigue: an expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J Environ Psychol 23:147–157

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps AE (2004) Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 24:1–16

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps AE (2006) Literature review of prospect and refuge theory: the first 214 references. Institute of Environmental Quality, San Francisco, CA. Accessed on the internet on 2010-04-14 at http://home.comcast.net/~instituteofenvironmentalquality/LitReviewProspectAndRefuge.pdf

  • Stamps AE (2008a) Some findings on prospect and refuge theory: I. Percept Motor Skill 106:147–162

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps AE (2008b) Some findings on prospect and refuge theory: II. Percept Motor Skill 107:141–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Schreyer R (1987) Attitudes toward wilderness and factors affecting visitor behavior: a state-of-knowledge review. In: Lucas RC (ed) Proceedings – National wilderness research conference: issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 246–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Stremlow M, Sidler C (2002) Schreibzüge durch die Wildnis. In: Wildnisvorstellungen in Literatur und Printmedien der Schweiz. Haup, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale SE, Wells KB, Tang L, Belin TR, Zhang L, Sherbourne CD (2007) The importance of social context: neighborhood stressors, stress-buffering mechanisms, and alcohol, drug, and mental health disorders. Soc Sci Med 65:1867–1881

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Strumse E (1996) Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. J Environ Psychol 16:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Summit J, Sommer R (1999) Further studies of preferred tree shapes. Environ Behav 31:550–576

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Susser M, Susser E (1996) Choosing a future for epidemiology: I Eras and paradigms. Am J Pub Health 86:668–673

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Szczygiel B, Hewitt R (2000) Nineteenth-century medical landscapes: John H. Rauch, Frederick Law Olmsted, and the search for salubrity. Bull Hist Med 74:708–734

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RP (1998) Splashdown. New Sci 2144:30

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RP (2001) Architects reaches for the clouds: how fractals may figure in our appreciation of a proposed new building. Nature 410:18

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RP (2003) Fractal expressionism-where art meets science. In: Kasti J, Karlqvist A (eds) Art and complexity. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RP (2006) Reduction of physiological stress using fractal art and architecture. Leonardo 39(3):45–251

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RP, Newell B, Spehar B, Clifford CWG (2001) Fractals: a resonance between art and nature? Symmetry: art and science 1:194–18197

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RP, Spehar B, Wise JA, Clifford CWG, Newell BR, Hagerhall CM, Purcell T, Martin TP (2005) Perceptual and physiological responses to the visual complexity of fractal patterns. J Nonlinear Dynam Psychol Life Sci 9:89–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas K (1983) Man and the natural world: a history of the modern sensibility. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend M (2006) Feel blue? Touch green! Participation in forest/woodland management as a treatment for depression. Urban Forest Urban Green 5:111–120

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan YF (1974) Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Behavior and the ­natural environment. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Behavior and the natural environment. Plenum, New York, pp 85–125

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1993) Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 73–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1999) Effects of gardens on health outcomes: theory and research. In: Cooper Marcus C, Barnes M (eds) Healing gardens: therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. Wiley, New York, pp 27–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS, Simons R, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg AE, Koole SL, Van der Wulp NY (2003) Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? J Environ Psychol 23:135–146

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg AE, Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP (2010) Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc Sci Med 70:1203–1210

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg AE, ter Heijne M (2005) Fear versus fascination: an exploration of emotional responses to natural threats. J Environ Psychol 25(3):261–272

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg AE, Van Winsum-Westra M (2010) Manicured, romantic, or wild? The relation between need for structure and preferences for garden styles. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 9:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg AE, Vlek CAJ, Coeterier JF (1998) Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: a multilevel approach. J Environ Psychol 18:141–157

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T (2003) A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape Urban Plan 63:109–126

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes – landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forest Urban Green 6:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • von Engelhardt D (1997) Tuberkulose und Kultur um 1900: Arzt, Patient und Sanatorium in Thomas Manns ‘Zauberberg’ aus medizinhistorischer Sicht. In: Sprecher T (ed) Auf dem Weg zum ‘Zauberberg’: die Davoser Literaturtage 1996, (s. 323–346). Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells NM, Evans GW (2003) Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environ Behav 35:311–330

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Whiston Spirn A (1985) Urban nature and human design: renewing the great tradition. J Plan Edu Res 5:39–51

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia, the human bond with other species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodziczko A (1928) Wielkopolski Park Narodowy w Ludwikowie pod Poznaniem (Wielkopolski National Park in Ludwikowo near Poznan). Ochrona Przyrody 8:46–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodziczko A (1930) Ziele〉 miast z punktu widzenia ochrony roślin (Urban green space as seen from the nature conservation point of view). Ochrona Przyrody 10:34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill JF (1983) The concept of nature: a psychologist’s view. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Behavior and the natural environment. Plenum Press, New York, pp 5–37

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1948) Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 states (Official records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1986) Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Zube EH, Sell JL, Taylor JG (1982) Landscape perception: research, application, and theory. Landscape Plan 9:1–33

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman M (1994) Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Terry Hartig

  2. Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Agnes E. van den Berg

  3. Department of Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway

    Caroline M. Hagerhall

  4. Institute of Plant Protection, National Research Institute, Poznan, Poland

    Marek Tomalak

  5. Economics and Social Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Nicole Bauer

  6. Department of Environmental Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Ralf Hansmann

  7. Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Ann Ojala

  8. Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Efi Syngollitou

  9. Department of Cultural and Educational Studies, University of Roma Tre, Rome, Italy

    Giuseppe Carrus

  10. Ecosystem Services Group, Institute for Nature and Forest Research, Brussels, Belgium

    Ann van Herzele

  11. Open Space Research Centre, Edinburgh College of Art, Edinburgh, UK

    Simon Bell

  12. Department of Landscape Architecture, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia

    Simon Bell

  13. Anatomy Department, University of Malta, Tal-Qroqq, Malta

    Marie Therese Camilleri Podesta

  14. Department of Public Planning and Natural Resource Management, Steinkjer Municipality, Steinkjer, Norway

    Grete Waaseth

Authors
  1. Terry Hartig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Agnes E. van den Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caroline M. Hagerhall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marek Tomalak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicole Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ralf Hansmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ann Ojala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Efi Syngollitou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Giuseppe Carrus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ann van Herzele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Simon Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Marie Therese Camilleri Podesta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Grete Waaseth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Hartig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Parks and Urban Landscapes, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, Frederiksberg C, 1958, Denmark

    Kjell Nilsson

  2. , Land Use and Social Research, Forestry Commission, Corstorphine Road 231, Edinburgh, EH12 7AT, United Kingdom

    Marcus Sangster

  3. , National Agricultural Research Foundatio, Forest Research Institute, Thessaloniki, 57006, Greece

    Christos Gallis

  4. , Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Radhustorget 1, Gävle, 80320, Sweden

    Terry Hartig

  5. , Alterra, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, 6700 AA, Netherlands

    Sjerp de Vries

  6. , Group Society, Environment & Culture, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (E, Sonneggstrasse 33, SOL E, Zurich, 9092, Switzerland

    Klaus Seeland

  7. , National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5 A - 2, Copenhagen K, 1353, Denmark

    Jasper Schipperijn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartig, T. et al. (2011). Health Benefits of Nature Experience: Psychological, Social and Cultural Processes. In: , et al. Forests, Trees and Human Health. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1_5

Download citation