Abstract
The chapter scrutinises the practice and rhetoric of mathematical modelling in primary and secondary mathematics classrooms from a sociological perspective. In classrooms, mathematical modelling tasks involve a variation of knowledge domains that can be analysed by employing the Bernsteinian notion of knowledge recontextualisation. By drawing on structurally different examples of modelling activities in mathematics classrooms, the chapter reconsiders the ways in which the recontextualisation principle connects to issues of access, control and success. The chapter also raises some issues that are related to the social emptiness of a curriculum with a focus on developing generic competencies through mathematical modelling. It is argued that descriptions of mathematical modelling without reference to the social community in which the modelling takes place, leave a vacant space that can be filled with different ideologies. This contributes to the mythologising of the educational effects of mathematical modelling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appelbaum, P. M. (2004). Mathematics education. In J. Kincheloe & D. Weil (Eds.), Critical thinking and learning: An encyclopedia for parents and teachers (pp. 307–312). Westport: Greenwood.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
Blum, W., Galbraith, P., Henn, H.-W., & Niss, M. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study. Berlin: Springer.
Brown, A. (2000). Positioning, pedagogy and parental participation in school mathematics: An exploration of implications for the public understanding of mathematics. Social Epistemology, 14(1), 21–31.
Chouliaraki, L. (1996). Regulative practices in a ‘progressivist’ classroom: ‘Good habits’ as a disciplinary technology. Language and Education, 10(2 & 3), 103–118.
Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex and problem solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogical texts. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Dowling, P. (2009). Sociology as method: Departures from the forensics of culture, text and knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.
English, L. D. (2006). Mathematical modeling in the primary school: Children’s construction of a con-sumer guide. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 303–323.
English, L. D., & Watters, J. J. (2005). Mathematical modeling in third-grade classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16, 59–80.
Galbraith, P., Stillman, G., & Brown, J. (2006). Identifying key transition activities for enhanced engagement in mathematical modeling. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces. Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 237–245). Adelaide: MERGA.
García, F. J., & Ruiz-Higueras, L. (2010). Exploring the use of theoretical frameworks for modelling-oriented instructional design. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education: January 28th–February 1st 2009 (pp. 2166–2175). Lyon: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.
Gellert, U., & Jablonka, E. (2009). “I am not talking about reality”: Word problems and the intricacies of producing legitimate text. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 39–53). Rotterdam: Sense.
Grigoras, R., & Halverscheid, S. (2008). Modelling the travelling salesman problem: Relations between the world of mathematics and the rest of the world. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 3, pp. 105–112). Mexico: Cinvestav-UMSNH.
Hasan, R. (2001). The ontogenesis of decontextualised language: Some achievements of classification and framing. In A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, & H. Daniels (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research (pp. 47–79). New York: Peter Lang.
Howson, A. G. (1989). Curriculum towards the year 2000. In J. Malone, H. Burkhardt, & C. Keitel (Eds.), The mathematics curriculum: Towards the year 2000 (pp. 13–17). Purth: Curtin University of Technology.
Jablonka, E. (1996). Meta-Analyse von Zugängen zur mathematischen Modellbildung und Konsequenzen für den Unterricht. Berlin: transparent verlag.
Jablonka, E. (2007). The relevance of modelling and applications: Relevant to whom and for what purpose? In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 193–200). Berlin: Springer.
Jablonka, E. (2009). Mathematics for all: Why? what? when? In C. Winsløw (Ed.), Nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 293–305). Rotterdam: Sense.
Jablonka, E., & Gellert, U. (2007). Mathematisation—demathematisation. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematization and de-mathematization: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam: Sense.
Julie, C. (2002). The activity system of school-teaching mathematics and mathematical modelling. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(3), 29–37.
Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. (2003). Foundations of a model & modeling perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. In R. A. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling (pp. 3–34). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lubienski, S. T. (2000). A clash of social class cultures? Students’ experiences in a discussion-intensive seventh-grade mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 377–403.
Moore, R., & Young, M. (2001). Knowledge and the curriculum in the sociology of education: Towards a reconceptualisation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(4), 445–461.
Morais, A., & Miranda, C. (1996). Understanding teachers’ evaluative criteria: A condition for success in science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 601–624.
Moss, G. (2000). Informal literacies and pedagogic discourse. Linguistics and Education, 11(1), 47–64.
Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2008). Young children’s access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 75–108). New York: Routledge.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Treffers, A., & Goffree, F. (1985). Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education—The Wiskobas program. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 97–121). Utrecht: OW&OC, Utrecht University.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35.
Zbiek, R. M., & Conner, A. (2006). Beyond motivation: Exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 98–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jablonka, E., Gellert, U. (2010). Equity Concerns About Mathematical Modelling. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9802-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9803-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)